Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (2024)

×

Log in Upload File

  • Most Popular
  • Study
  • Business
  • Design
  • Technology
  • Travel
  • Explore all categories
  • Home
  • Documents
  • Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables

54

Upload: saradhi26

Post on 14-Feb-2016

259 views

Category:

Documents


7 download

Report

  • Download
Facebook Twitter E-Mail LinkedIn Pinterest

Tags:

  • e sthe

  • f i s h e r i e s

  • d r e s o u r c e s

  • e n e rg yt

  • b e i ngd

  • e n te x p e n d i t

  • fo r e s t s

  • n d p ro t e c t e da

DESCRIPTION

wr2002

TRANSCRIPT

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (3)

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (4)

T a b l e 1G O V E R NA NC E A N D AC C E S S T OI N F O R M AT I O N

T a b l e 2G L O B A L G O V E R NA NC E

T a b l e 3F I NA NC I A L F L OW S , G O V E R N M E N TE X P E N D I T U R E S , A N D CO R P O R AT I O N S

T a b l e 4E C O NO M I C I N D I C AT O R S

T a b l e 5AG R I C U LT U R E A N D FO O D

T a b l e 6B I O D I V E R S I T Y A N D P RO T E C T E DA R E A S

T a b l e 7C L I M AT E A N D AT M O S P H E R E

T a b l e 8E N E RG Y

T a b l e 9F I S H E R I E S A N D AQ UAC U LT U R E

T a b l e 1 0FO R E S T S, G R A S S L A N D S , A N DD RY L A N D S

T a b l e 11F R E S H WAT E R R E S O U RC E S

T a b l e 1 2P O P U L AT I O N, H E A LT H , A N D H U M A NW E L L -B E I NG

D A T A T A B L E S

WORLD RESOURCES

PA R T II2002-2004

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (5)

232W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 2 – 2 0 0 4

Country groupings are based on lists developed by theFood and Agriculture Organization of the UnitedNations (FAO), (developed and developing countries),the World Bank (high-, medium-, and low-income coun-tries), and the World Resources Institute (WRI)(regional classifications). See pages 282–283 for a fulllisting.

Several general notes apply to all the data tables in thereport (except where noted otherwise):

• “..” in a data column signifies that data are not avail-able or are not relevant (for example, country statushas changed, as with the former Soviet republics)

• Negative values are shown in parentheses

• 0 appearing in a table indicates a value of either zeroor one-half the unit of measure used in the table; (0)indicates a value less than zero and greater than neg-ative one-half.

• Except where identified by a footnote, regionaltotals are calculated using regions designated by theWorld Resources Institute. Totals represent either asummation or a weighted average of available data.Weighted averages of ratios use the denominator ofthe ratio as the weight. Regional totals are publishedonly if more than 85% of the relevant data are avail-able for a particular region. Missing values are notimputed.

• The regional totals published here use data from all 222 countries and territories in the WorldResources/EarthTrends database (some of thesecountries are omitted from the current tables).Regional summations and weighted averages calcu-lated with only the 155 countries listed in these datatables will therefore not match the published totals.

• Except where identified with a footnote, world totalsare presented as calculated by the original datasource (which may include countries not listed inWRI’s database); original sources are listed aftereach data table.

• Comprehensive technical notes are available in thepages following each data table.

Information about the

World Resources 2002–2004

Data Tables

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (6)

233P a r t I I : D a t a T a b l e s

The 12 data tables published on the following pages area subset of a larger on-line data collection, the WorldResources/EarthTrends Database. This on-line datasource includes more than 30 tables, along with coun-try profiles, maps, feature stories, and a searchabledatabase with over 600 statistical indicators spanning30-plus years. Access this data source in one of the fol-lowing ways:

EarthTrends : The Env i ronmenta l I n format ion Por ta lhttp://earthtrends.wri.orgEarthTrends is a free on-line collection of environmen-tal, social, and economic information. The websiteoffers statistical, graphic, and analytical data from over40 internationally recognized sources. Detailed meta-data documents the data collection, research method-ologies, and reliability of all of EarthTrends’ content.

EarthTrends for Low-Bandwidth Usershttp://earthtrends.wri.org/textIn an effort to broaden global access to sustainabledevelopment information, WRI has developed a low-bandwidth companion to the EarthTrends site. Viewthe entire EarthTrends collection of information with-out high-resolution graphics.

EarthTrends v ia E-ma i lEarthTrends via E-mail provides a way for users toreceive environmental and sustainable developmentinformation through simple, structured e-mail requests.Send an e-mail to [emailprotected] with “Instruc-tions” in the message body, or view full instructions athttp://earthtrends.wri.org/text/webinvoke.htm.

Wor ld Resources/EarthTrends Data CD-ROMGain instant, portable access to EarthTrends’ databaseon global conditions and trends with the EarthTrendsCD-ROM. This time-saving research and reference toolcontains all of the economic, population, naturalresource, and environmental statistics contained inthe EarthTrends website and the print edition of WorldResources 2002–2004. Available by order from http://www.wristore.com

TerraV i va ! Wor ld Resources , 2003 Ed i t i onThe next generation in the World Resources/Earth-Trends series, TerraViva! World Resources integratesthe comprehensive World Resources/EarthTrendsDatabase with state-of-the-art mapping and analyticaltools to make world data come alive visually. Comparehundreds of environmental, social, and economic variables, generating maps, graphs, tables, or text asoutput. Available by order from http://www.wristore.com

World Resources Information and

Statist ics Avai lable On-l ine and

via CD-ROM

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (7)

1991- 2001- 1991- 2001-1992 2002 1992 2002 1990 2000

WORLD .. .. .. .. .. 14 .. 30 43 .. .. 419 81ASIA (EXCL. MIDDLE EAST) .. .. .. .. .. 15 .. 6 9 .. .. 258 42Armenia PF PF 5 4 5 3 .. .. 129 60 pending 225 ..Azerbaijan PF PF 5 5 -7 11 2.0 .. 45 77 .. 22 3Bangladesh F PF 3 4 6 2 0.4 6 9 63 pending 49 1Bhutan PF NF 5 6 -8 9 .. 108 62 72 .. 50 1Cambodia NF NF 6 5 2 9 .. 8 30 68 .. 119 1China NF NF 7 6 -7 22 3.5 1 2 a 80 .. 339 26Georgia NF PF 5 4 5 7 .. .. 125 53 in effect 556 5India PF F 4 3 9 9 2.7 2 3 42 pending 121 7 bIndonesia PF PF 5 4 7 8 1.9 6 9 c 53 pending 157 19Japan F F 2 2 10 10 7.1 19 28 17 in effect 956 455Kazakhstan PF NF 4 5 -4 11 2.7 .. 26 69 .. 422 ..Korea, Dem People's Rep NF NF 7 7 -9 20 .. 8 10 96 .. 154 ..Korea, Rep F F 3 2 8 6 4.2 28 45 30 in effect 1,033 518Kyrgyzstan PF NF 4 5 -3 7 .. .. 48 68 .. 111 ..Lao People's Dem Rep NF NF 7 6 -7 .. .. 22 43 82 .. 148 2Malaysia PF PF 4 5 3 15 5.0 63 83 71 .. 420 252Mongolia F F 3 3 10 11 .. 55 140 31 .. 154 16Myanmar NF NF 7 7 -7 .. .. 6 9 96 .. 92 0Nepal F PF 3 4 6 6 .. 20 33 60 pending 39 3Pakistan PF NF 5 5 -6 .. 2.3 9 10 57 pending 105 3Philippines PF F 3 3 8 17 2.9 20 26 30 in effect 161 26Singapore PF PF 4 5 -2 12 9.2 382 477 68 .. 672 365Sri Lanka PF PF 5 4 5 4 .. 53 69 63 pending 208 8Tajikistan PF NF 3 6 -1 12 .. .. 28 80 .. 141 1Thailand PF F 4 3 9 10 3.2 20 29 30 in effect 235 56Turkmenistan PF NF 5 7 -9 26 .. .. 32 91 .. 256 2Uzbekistan PF NF 5 6 -9 7 2.7 .. 14 84 in effect d 456 6Viet Nam NF NF 7 6 -7 26 2.6 4 10 82 .. 109 5EUROPE .. .. .. .. .. 18 .. .. 163 .. .. 732 196Albania PF PF 4 4 5 6 .. 28 227 48 in effect 243 3Austria F F 1 1 10 25 7.8 350 529 24 in effect 753 322Belarus PF NF 4 6 -7 18 .. .. 72 82 .. 299 42Belgium F F 1 2 10 25 6.6 365 541 9 in effect 793 281Bosnia and Herzegovina .. PF .. 4 .. 5 .. .. 128 53 in effect 257 11Bulgaria F F 3 3 8 26 3.9 111 244 29 in effect 543 77Croatia PF F 4 2 7 16 3.9 .. 390 33 pending 340 ..Czech Rep .. F .. 2 10 14 3.9 .. 292 25 in effect 803 136Denmark F F 1 1 10 38 9.5 654 914 9 in effect 1,139 450Estonia F F 3 2 6 18 5.6 .. 1,007 18 in effect 708 312Finland F F 1 1 10 37 9.9 540 829 10 in effect 1,492 432 eFrance F F 2 2 9 11 6.7 80 118 17 in effect 950 263Germany F F 2 2 10 31 7.4 66 75 15 .. 948 366Greece F F 2 3 10 9 4.2 209 335 30 in effect 478 132Hungary F F 2 2 10 8 5.3 153 329 23 in effect 690 149Iceland F F 1 1 10 35 9.2 4,161 5,819 8 in effect 956 693Ireland F F 1 1 10 14 7.5 596 941 16 in effect 695 233Italy F F 1 2 10 9 5.5 66 98 27 in effect 878 278Latvia F F 3 2 8 17 3.4 .. 499 19 in effect 713 71Lithuania F F 3 2 10 11 4.8 .. 358 19 in effect 513 68Macedonia, FYR .. PF .. 4 6 7 .. .. 300 46 pending 205 34Moldova, Rep PF PF 4 4 7 13 3.1 .. 103 59 in effect d 747 14Netherlands F F 1 1 10 33 8.8 271 392 15 in effect 980 333Norway F F 1 1 10 36 8.6 649 918 9 in effect 915 602Poland F F 2 2 9 21 4.1 45 87 18 in effect 523 99Portugal F F 1 1 10 19 6.3 234 390 15 in effect 304 359 fRomania PF F 5 2 8 9 2.8 39 100 35 in effect 319 45Russian Federation PF PF 3 5 7 6 2.3 .. 19 60 .. 418 30Serbia and Montenegro NF PF 5 3 7 6 .. 150 137 45 pending 297 57Slovakia .. F .. 2 9 14 3.7 .. 359 22 in effect 966 ..Slovenia F F 3 2 10 12 5.2 .. 904 20 pending 405 302Spain F F 1 2 10 27 7.0 86 134 17 in effect 333 185Sweden F F 1 1 10 43 9.0 370 559 8 in effect 932 521Switzerland F F 1 1 10 22 8.4 479 673 8 pending 1,002 407Ukraine PF PF 3 4 7 8 2.1 .. 28 60 in effect 889 12United Kingdom F F 2 2 10 17 8.3 85 128 18 in effect g 1,432 403MIDDLE EAST & N. AFRICA .. .. .. .. .. 4 .. 42 49 .. .. 258 22Afghanistan NF NF 7 7 -7 .. .. 7 7 .. .. 114 ..Algeria PF NF 4 5 -3 4 .. 28 33 62 .. 244 2Egypt PF NF 5 6 -6 2 3.6 24 28 77 .. 339 9Iran, Islamic Rep NF NF 5 6 3 3 .. 12 14 75 .. 279 6Iraq NF NF 7 7 -9 8 .. 29 22 96 .. 222 ..Israel F F 2 3 10 13 7.6 401 383 h 30 in effect 526 243Jordan PF PF 4 5 -2 3 4.9 180 133 60 .. 372 42Kuwait NF PF 5 5 -7 0 .. 253 369 49 .. 650 101Lebanon PF NF 4 5 2 .. 182 291 74 .. 687 ..Libyan Arab Jamahiriya NF NF 7 7 -7 .. .. 78 78 88 .. 273 4Morocco PF PF 5 5 -6 1 .. 37 47 i 58 .. 243 13Oman NF NF 6 5 -9 .. .. 117 148 68 .. 621 46Saudi Arabia NF NF 6 7 -10 .. .. 39 48 80 .. 326 14Syrian Arab Rep NF NF 7 7 -7 10 .. 36 36 78 .. 276 4Tunisia PF NF 5 5 -3 12 5.3 102 125 73 .. 143 42Turkey PF PF 4 5 7 4 3.6 22 33 58 .. 181 37United Arab Emirates NF NF 5 5 -8 0 .. 191 295 74 .. 318 339 jYemen PF NF 5 6 -2 1 .. 25 18 65 .. 65 1

mentaryof Parlia-

Seats

democratic)

(1=most free,7= least free)

lation1997

InternetUsersPer

1,000Popu-lation2001

RadiosFreedom

Per 1,000Popu-tion,

Press Freedom

(1-30=free,31-60=partly

Index(10=least

Status in2002

free, 61-100=not free)

2001Population

Million

Level ofLevel of Freedom

Non-Governmental

Polity Indexof Democracy/

CorruptionPerceptions

Percent

cratic, 10=fully (NGOs) Per(-10=fully auto-

2000

corrupt, 0=most corrupt)

2001

Held byWomen

2002

(free (F), partlyfree (PF), not

free (NF))

of Infor-mationLegisla-

LibertiesCivil

OrganizationsAutocracy

interruption

Data Table 1 Governance and Access to InformationSources: Freedom House, Polity IV Project, Inter-Parliamentary Union, Transparency International, Union of InternationalAssociations, Privacy International, World Bank, International Telecommunications Union

234W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 2 – 2 0 0 4

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (8)

1991- 2001- 1991- 2001-1992 2002 1992 2002 1990 2000

SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA .. .. .. .. .. 12 .. 40 59 .. .. 198 ..Angola PF NF 4 6 -3 16 .. 28 38 79 .. 52 4Benin F F 3 2 6 6 .. 85 115 30 .. 107 4Botswana F F 2 2 9 17 6.0 283 419 30 pending 155 ..Burkina Faso NF PF 5 4 -3 11 .. 45 58 39 .. 35 2Burundi NF NF 6 6 -1 20 .. 52 71 77 .. 69 1Cameroon NF NF 6 6 -4 6 2.0 53 70 68 .. 163 3Central African Rep PF PF 5 5 6 7 .. 90 115 69 .. 80 1Chad NF NF 6 5 -2 2 .. 38 51 74 .. 236 0Congo PF PF 4 4 -6 12 .. 173 198 53 .. 123 ..Congo, Dem Rep NF NF 5 6 .. .. 17 117 86 .. 386 0Côte d'Ivoire PF PF 4 4 4 9 2.4 58 67 66 .. 153 4Equatorial Guinea NF NF 7 6 -5 5 .. 270 362 80 .. 427 2Eritrea .. NF .. 6 -6 15 .. .. 40 79 .. 318 3Ethiopia PF PF 5 5 1 8 .. 9 13 61 .. 197 0Gabon PF PF 3 4 -4 11 .. 355 422 52 .. 183 ..Gambia F PF 2 5 -5 .. .. 359 385 65 .. 165 13Ghana NF F 6 3 2 9 3.4 55 60 27 pending 244 2Guinea NF NF 5 5 -1 9 .. 43 67 74 .. 52 2Guinea-Bissau PF PF 5 5 6 8 .. 124 213 56 .. 44 3Kenya NF NF 6 5 -2 4 2.0 43 54 67 pending 109 16Lesotho PF PF 4 4 11 .. 187 233 46 .. 53 2Liberia NF NF 6 6 0 11 .. 170 140 77 .. 274 0Madagascar PF PF 4 4 7 8 .. 42 44 31 .. 216 2Malawi NF PF 6 3 7 9 3.2 47 59 54 pending 269 2Mali PF F 4 3 6 12 .. 43 55 23 .. 56 3Mauritania NF PF 6 5 -6 .. .. 130 155 61 .. 149 3Mozambique PF PF 4 4 6 30 .. 20 31 48 .. 44 1Namibia F F 3 3 6 20 5.4 108 372 34 pending 141 25Niger PF PF 5 4 4 1 .. 38 46 49 .. 70 1Nigeria PF PF 4 5 4 3 1.0 12 14 57 pending 200 ..Rwanda NF NF 6 6 -4 26 .. 45 68 87 .. 76 3Senegal PF PF 3 4 8 19 2.9 103 118 39 .. 141 10Sierra Leone PF PF 5 5 9 .. 115 132 62 .. 237 2Somalia NF NF 7 7 .. .. 29 23 88 .. 60 0South Africa PF F 4 2 9 28 4.8 38 67 23 in effect 338 70Sudan NF NF 7 7 -7 10 .. 23 25 87 .. 257 2Tanzania, United Rep NF PF 5 4 2 22 2.2 27 32 49 pending 281 8Togo NF PF 5 5 -2 5 .. 124 146 68 .. 227 11Uganda NF PF 6 5 -4 25 1.9 33 45 42 .. 127 2Zambia F PF 3 4 1 12 2.6 84 105 65 pending 109 2Zimbabwe PF NF 4 6 -5 10 2.9 81 114 83 in effect k 96 8NORTH AMERICA .. .. .. .. .. 19 .. 23 33 .. .. 2,012 493Canada F F 1 1 10 24 8.9 96 133 16 in effect 1,047 435United States F F 1 1 10 14 7.6 15 22 16 in effect 2,118 500C. AMERICA & CARIBBEAN .. .. .. .. .. 19 .. 72 89 .. .. 317 35Belize F F 1 2 .. 14 .. 1,270 2,010 24 in effect 613 78Costa Rica F F 1 2 10 .. 4.5 300 348 17 .. 274 93Cuba NF NF 7 7 -7 28 .. 54 89 96 .. 353 11Dominican Rep F F 3 2 8 15 3.1 91 106 30 .. 181 22 lEl Salvador PF F 4 3 7 10 3.6 105 132 35 .. 465 ..Guatemala PF PF 5 4 8 9 2.9 82 92 49 pending 79 17Haiti NF NF 7 6 -2 9 .. 65 74 72 .. 55 4Honduras F PF 3 3 7 6 2.7 108 124 43 .. 412 ..Jamaica F F 2 3 9 16 .. 287 347 17 in effect g 476 38Mexico PF F 4 3 8 16 3.7 21 27 40 in effect g 330 35Nicaragua PF PF 3 3 8 21 2.4 130 151 32 pending 265 ..Panama PF F 2 2 9 10 3.7 318 354 30 in effect d 300 ..Trinidad and Tobago F PF 1 3 10 17 5.3 488 625 30 in effect 532 92SOUTH AMERICA .. .. .. .. .. 13 .. 44 55 .. .. 460 60Argentina F PF 3 3 8 31 3.5 57 74 37 pending 681 80Bolivia F F 3 3 9 10 2.0 116 141 25 pending 676 ..Brazil F PF 3 3 8 7 4.0 14 18 32 .. 433 46Chile F F 2 2 9 10 7.5 103 140 22 .. 354 201Colombia PF PF 4 4 7 12 3.8 36 45 60 in effect 524 27 mEcuador F PF 3 3 6 15 2.3 84 101 40 .. 377 25Guyana PF F 4 2 6 20 .. 482 583 23 .. 561 124Paraguay PF PF 3 3 7 8 .. 144 171 51 pending 182 11Peru PF F 5 3 18 4.1 55 66 30 in effect 273 115 nSuriname PF F 4 2 .. 18 .. 634 832 25 .. 729 35Uruguay F F 2 1 10 12 5.1 328 450 25 pending 603 119Venezuela F PF 3 5 7 10 2.8 68 76 44 .. 472 53OCEANIA .. .. .. .. .. 22 .. 209 291 .. .. 1,065 ..Australia F F 1 1 10 27 8.5 138 196 10 in effect 1,376 372 oFiji PF PF 4 3 6 .. 538 797 33 pending 639 18New Zealand F F 1 1 10 31 9.4 489 687 8 in effect 997 287Papua New Guinea F F 3 3 10 2 .. 121 149 26 pending 86 ..Solomon Islands F PF 1 4 .. 0 .. 477 631 24 .. 141 4DEVELOPED .. .. .. .. .. 18 .. .. 112 .. .. 1,028 286DEVELOPING .. .. .. .. .. 12 .. 17 24 .. .. 245 26a. Data for China include Tibet, but not Hong Kong or Macao. b. Estimates are for fiscal year beginning 1 April. c. Data for Indonesia include East Timor. d. Although Freedom of Informationlaws exist, weaknesses in the legislation have prompted criticism. e. As of June, 2001. f. As of September, 2001. g. Law enacted but not yet in force. h. Data for Israel include the occupiedterritories. i. Data for Morocco include Western Sahara. j. Internet dial-up customers. k. The main thrust of the law passed in Zimbabwe was to give the government extensive powers tocontrol the media by requiring the registration of journalists and prohibiting the “abuse of free expression.” l. Data as of 30 September. m. Ministry of Communications' estimate. n. OSIPTEL estimate. o. Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics.

2002 1997 20012000 2002 2001 2001

Popu-democratic) Women most corrupt) Population not free) Status in lation lation

1,000free (NF)) 7= least free) cratic, 10=fully Held by corrupt, 0= Million free, 61-100= tion, Popu-

Per free (PF), not (1=most free, (-10=fully auto- Seats (10=least (NGOs) Per 31-60=partly Legisla- 1,000

Users(free (F), partly Liberties Autocracy mentary Index Organizations (1-30=free, mation Per

InternetFreedom Civil of Democracy/ of Parlia- Perceptions Governmental Freedom of Infor- Radios

Corruption Non- Press FreedomLevel of Level of Polity Index Percent

interregnum

in transition

in transition

interregnum

in transition

interregnum

235P a r t I I : D a t a T a b l e s

Data Table 1 continuedMore data tables are available. Log on to http://earthtrends.wri.org/datatables/governance or send an e-mail [emailprotected] with “Instructions” in the message body.

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (9)

VARIABLE DEFINITIONS AND METHODOLOGYLevel of Freedom is designated by Freedom House as Free(F), Partly Free (PF), or Not Free (NF). In Free countries, abroad range of political rights and civil liberties are respected.Partly Free countries have a mixed record on political rightsand civil liberties, often accompanied by corruption, weak ruleof law, and the inordinate political dominance of a ruling party.In Not Free countries, basic political rights and civil libertiesare denied. A country’s freedom rating reflects both politicalrights and civil liberties, each measured on a scale of 1 to 7. Ifa country’s combined average political rights and civil libertiesranking is between 1 and 2.5, the country is “Free.” Countrieswith averages between 3 and 5.5 are “Partly Free”; greater than5.5, “Not Free.” For more information, please refer to the webpage maintained by Freedom House: http://www.freedomhouse.org/research/freeworld/2001/methodology.htm.

Level of Civil Liberties is rated on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1representing the most free and 7 representing the least free.Countries with a rating of 1 generally have an established andequitable rule of law with free economic activity. A rating of 2indicates some deficiencies, while a rating of 3, 4, or 5 indicatesvarying degrees of censorship, political terror, and preventionof free association. Countries with a rating of 6 experienceseverely restricted freedom of expression and association cou-pled with political terror (e.g., political prisoners). A rating of7 indicates virtually no freedom. Freedom House notes that apoor rating for a country “is not necessarily a comment on theintentions of the government, but may indicate real restrictionson liberty caused by non-governmental terror.” To determineeach rating, researchers answer a series of survey questions.The survey team may make some small adjustments for factorssuch as extreme violence. The 14 civil liberties questions, avail-able on-line at http://www.freedomhouse.org/research/freeworld/2001/methodology3.htm, are classified in four cat-egories: Freedom of Expression and Belief, Association andOrganizational Rights, Rule of Law and Human Rights, and Per-sonal Autonomy and Economic Rights.

The Polity Index of Democracy/Autocracy is a scale from -10 to +10 measuring the degree to which a nation is eitherautocratic or democratic. A score of +10 indicates a stronglydemocratic state; a score of -10 a strongly autocratic state. Afully democratic government has three essential elements: fullycompetitive political participation, institutionalized constraintson executive power, and guarantee of civil liberties to all citi-zens in their daily lives and in political participation. A fullyautocratic system sharply restricts or suppresses competitivepolitical participation. The chief executives are chosen by anelite group and exercise power with few institutionalized con-straints. Some countries are labeled “interruption,” indicatingan interruption in government due to foreign occupation; “inter-regnum,” marking an interregnum period after the complete col-lapse of a centralized political authority; or, “in transition,” indi-cating a transitional or provisional government in control asnew institutions are planned. The Polity index does not measureimpacts unless they affect the central governing structure. Acomplete explanation of the index is available in the Polity IVProject Dataset User’s Manual, on-line at http://www.bsos.umd.edu/cidcm/inscr/polity/polreg.htm.

Percent of Parliamentary Seats Held by Women is calcu-lated based on the total number of seats in parliament and thenumber of seats occupied by women. When there is both anUpper House (Senate) and a Lower House of parliament, thetotal number of women in both houses is divided by the totalnumber of seats in both houses. Data are current as of March 1,2002. The Interparliamentary Union compiles these data basedon information provided by national parliaments.

The Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) measures thedegree to which corruption is perceived to exist among publicofficials and politicians. Ratings range in value from 10 (leastcorrupt) to 0 (most corrupt). The survey measures public sectorcorruption—the abuse of public office for private gain. In theCPI, data from 14 surveys are combined to measure the percep-tions of local residents, expatriates, business people, academ-ics, and risk analysts. Assessments from the past three years(1999–2001) are combined. A country is included in the CPI onlyif there are data available from three or more surveys. For fur-ther information, please consult: J.G. Lambsdorff. 2001. Back-ground Paper to the 2001 Corruption Perceptions Index. Avail-able on-line at http://www.transparency.org/cpi/2001/dnld/methodology.pdf.

Nongovernmental Organizations (NGOs) Per Million Pop-ulation is the number of NGOs with offices or members in aparticular country divided by the population. NGOs are identi-fied by the Union of International Associations based onseven organizational aspects: aims, membership, structure,officers, finance, relations with other organizations, and activi-ties. The following types of organizations are included in thisdata set: federations of international organizations; universalmembership organizations; intercontinental membershiporganizations; regionally defined membership organizations;organizations emanating from places, persons, or other bod-ies; and organizations having a special form, including founda-tions and funds.

Press Freedom is an index, defined by Freedom House as “thedegree to which each country permits the free flow of informa-tion” on a scale of 1 to 100. Countries with a score between 1and 30 are considered to have a “Free” media; 31 to 60, “PartlyFree”; and 61 to 100, “Not Free.” Freedom House emphasizesthat this survey does not measure press responsibility; rather, itmeasures the degree of freedom in the flow of information.Data are collected from overseas correspondents, staff travel,international visitors, the findings of human rights organiza-tions, specialists in geographic and geopolitical areas, thereports of governments, and a variety of domestic and interna-tional news media. The final index measures three separate cat-egories of influence on the media: national laws and adminis-trative decisions; censorship and intimidation; and quotas,licensing biases, or government funding.

Freedom of Information (FOI) Legislation requires disclo-sure of government records to the public. There are now 48countries with comprehensive general applicability FOI laws,plus a dozen or so countries with FOI-related constitutionalprovisions that can be used to access information. A country’sguarantee of public access to information is classified in one ofthree categories:

In Effect: These countries legally guarantee public access togovernment records through constitutional provisions or FOIlegislation.

Pending: Thirty additional countries are considering adoptingfreedom of information acts.

No Data: Marked by “..”, these are countries where no FOI leg-islation exists or no data are available concerning FOIA status.

Data are collected by Privacy International on a country-by-country basis and were last updated in July, 2002.

Radios Per 1,000 Population is the number of radio receiversused for broadcast to the general public, divided by a country’spopulation in thousands. Private sets installed in public places

236W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 2 – 2 0 0 4

Data Table 1 continued

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (10)

are also included, as well as communal receivers. The WorldBank obtains their data from statistical surveys conducted bythe United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Orga-nization (UNESCO).

Internet Users Per 1,000 Population measures the number ofpeople per thousand of a country’s population who have usedthe internet at any point in time during a specific year. Data aresupplied by annual questionnaires sent to telecommunicationauthorities and operating companies. These results are supple-mented by annual reports and statistical yearbooks of tele-communication ministries, regulators, operators, and industryassociations. In some cases, estimates are derived from Inter-national Telecommunications Union background documents orother references.

FREQUENCY OF UPDATE BY DATA PROVIDERS All data sets are updated annually, with the exception of theparliamentary and Internet data. These data sets are updatedevery 2–4 months. Data on radio receivers have not been col-lected on a global scale since 1999 (survey year 1997), whenUNESCO discontinued their Statistical Yearbook.

DATA RELIABILITY AND CAUTIONARY NOTES Many of the data in this table are index calculations and there-fore contain an unavoidable amount of subjectivity. Indices canmeasure ideas and behaviors instead of a discrete physicalquantity. While these data can illustrate rough comparisonsand trends over time, rigid score comparisons and rankings arediscouraged.

Polity Index of Democracy/Autocracy.The Polity IV dataare subject to substantial cross-checking and inter-coder relia-bility checks. The least reliable calculations are typically themost recent, due to “the fluidity of real-time political dynamicsand the effects this immediacy may have on the assignment ofPolity codes in a semi-annual research cycle”.

Percent of Parliamentary Seats Held by Women. Datachange with each national election; for the most recent statis-tics, please consult the IPU website at http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/classif.htm. Some governments and political partieshave established formal or informal quotas for women in vari-ous legislative positions. For more information on gender quo-tas, please consult the International Institute for Democracyand Electoral Assistance (IDEA) on-line at http://www.idea.int/gender/quotas.htm.

Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI). CPI is based solely onperceptions instead of hard empirical data such as cross-country comparisons of prosecutions, or media coverage of cor-ruption. Empirical data are not used because they may measurethe extent of anti-corruption efforts instead of the extent of cor-ruption. A spreadsheet with standard deviations, permutationtest results, and a list of the surveys used for each country isavailable on-line at http://www.gwdg.de/~uwvw/2001.htm.

Nongovernmental Organizations Per Million Population.The compilation of such a massive data set inevitably leads tomisreporting and underreporting of organizations. Many of thedata are self-reported and not evaluated for accuracy by the

Union of International Associations. Government-controlledNGOs, criticized for their ability to benefit government officialsand subvert the original purpose of a non-governmental organi-zation, may be included in some country totals. Regional totalsmay include double counting of NGOs present in more than onecountry. Comparisons between countries should be made withcare, as actual estimates of the number of NGOs vary widely.

Freedom of Information Legislation. While the FOI datahave been thoroughly researched, there are unavoidable diffi-culties in assigning each country to one of three categories.Some countries have laws guaranteeing access, but the lawsare not enforced. Still others guarantee access to governmentdocuments in specific sectors, but exclude access in other sec-tors. For a complete description of the FOI status for eachcountry, please refer to the Freedom of Information web sitemaintained by Privacy International http://www.privacyinternational.org/issues/foia.

Radios Per 1,000 People. In some countries, definitions, clas-sifications, and methods of enumeration do not entirely con-form to UNESCO standards. In addition, many countriesimpose radio license fees to help pay for public broadcasting,discouraging radio owners from declaring ownership.

SOURCES Level of Freedom and Civil Liberties: Freedom House. 2001.Freedom in the World 2001–2002: The Democracy Gap. New York:Freedom House. Data available on-line at http://www.freedomhouse.org/research/survey2002.htm. Polity Index:Polity IV Project. 2002. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Char-acteristics and Transitions. College Park: University of Mary-land. Available on-line at http://www.bsos.umd.edu/cidcm/inscr/polity/index.htm. Parliamentary Seats Held byWomen: Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU). 2002. Women inNational Parliament. Geneva: IPU. Available on-line at http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/classif.htm. Corruption PerceptionsIndex: Transparency International. 2001. 2001 Corruption Per-ceptions Index. Berlin: Transparency International. Available on-line at http://www.transparency.org/cpi/2001/cpi2001.html.NGOs Per Million Population: Center for the Study of GlobalGovernance. 2001. Global Civil Society 2001. Oxford: Oxford Uni-versity Press. Available on-line at http://www.lse.ac.uk/Depts/global/Yearbook/. Data were collected from the Unionof International Associations’ Yearbook of International Organi-zations by the Center for the Study of Global Governance.Press Freedom: Freedom House. 2002. The Annual Survey ofPress Freedom 2002. New York: Freedom House. Available on-line at http://www.freedomhouse.org/pfs2002/pfs2002.pdf.Freedom of Information Legislation: David Banisar. 2002.Freedom of Information and Access to Government RecordsAround the World. Washington, D.C.: Privacy International.Available on-line at http://www.privacyinternational.org/issues/foia/foia-survey.html. Radios Per 1,000 People:Development Data Group, World Bank. 2002. World DevelopmentIndicators 2002 Online. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. Avail-able at http://www.worldbank.org/data/. Internet UsersPer 1,000 People: International Telecommunications Union(ITU). 2002. World Telecommunications Indicators 2002. Geneva:ITU. Available on-line at http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/publications/world/world.html.

237P a r t I I : D a t a T a b l e s

Data Table 1 continued

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (11)

Year ofWTO {f} National

CBD Member- ReportingCITES UNFCCC Kyoto {c} Bio- Stock- ship Status in

{a} {b} Proto- (bio- Safety holm Con- Aarhus (or status 2002(species (climate col diver- Proto- vention Con- of mem- (n.r.= non-trade) change) (CO2) sity) col (POPs) {e} vention bership) reporting) 1996 2001

WORLD 1812 6416ASIA (EXCL. MIDDLE EAST) 87 461Armenia 1993 1993 n.p. 1993 n.p. 1993 n.p. 1997 [2001] 2001 observer pending .. ..Azerbaijan 1992 1992 1998 1995 2000 2000 n.p. 1998 n.p. 2000 observer n.r. .. ..Bangladesh 2000 1998 1981 1994 2001 1994 [2000] 1996 [2001] n.p. 1995 submitted .. 2Bhutan n.p. n.p. 2002 1995 2002 1995 2002 n.p. n.p. n.p. observer n.r. .. ..Cambodia 1992 1992 1997 1995 2002 1995 n.p. 1997 [2001] n.p. observer n.r. .. ..China [1998] 2001 1981 1993 2002 1993 [2000] 1997 [2001] n.p. 2001 pending 14 25Georgia 1994 1994 1996 1994 1999 1994 n.p. 1999 [2001] 2000 2000 pending .. ..India 1979 1979 1976 1993 2002 1994 [2001] 1996 [2002] n.p. 1995 pending 20 14Indonesia n.p. n.p. 1978 1994 [1998] 1994 [2000] 1998 [2001] n.p. 1995 submitted 6 8Japan 1979 1979 1980 1993 2002 1993 n.p. 1998 2002 n.p. 1995 submitted 26 110Kazakhstan n.p. n.p. 2000 1995 [1999] 1994 n.p. 1997 [2001] 2001 observer submitted .. ..Korea, Dem People's Rep 1981 1981 n.p. 1994 n.p. 1994 [2001] n.p. 2002 n.p. n.p. n.r. .. ..Korea, Rep 1990 1990 1993 1993 [1998] 1994 [2000] 1999 [2001] n.p. 1995 submitted 9 172Kyrgyzstan 1994 1994 n.p. 2000 n.p. 1996 n.p. 1997 [2002] 2001 1998 pending .. ..Lao People's Dem Rep [2000] [2000] n.p. 1995 n.p. 1996 n.p. 1996 [2002] n.p. observer n.r. .. ..Malaysia n.p. n.p. 1977 1994 2002 1994 [2000] 1997 [2002] n.p. 1995 pending .. 9Mongolia 1974 1974 1996 1993 1999 1993 n.p. 1996 [2002] n.p. 1997 pending .. 22Myanmar n.p. n.p. 1997 1994 n.p. 1994 [2001] 1997 n.p. n.p. 1995 submitted .. ..Nepal 1991 1991 1975 1994 n.p. 1993 [2001] 1996 [2002] n.p. observer submitted 1 4Pakistan n.p. n.p. 1976 1994 n.p. 1994 [2001] 1997 [2001] n.p. 1995 submitted .. 1Philippines 1986 1974 1981 1994 [1998] 1993 [2000] 2000 [2001] n.p. 1995 submitted 3 28Singapore n.p. n.p. 1986 1997 n.p. 1995 n.p. 1999 [2001] n.p. 1995 submitted .. 1Sri Lanka 1980 1980 1979 1993 2002 1994 [2000] 1998 [2001] n.p. 1995 submitted .. 24Tajikistan 1999 1999 n.p. 1998 n.p. 1997 n.p. 1997 [2002] 2001 observer submitted .. ..Thailand 1996 1999 1983 1994 2002 [1992] n.p. 2001 [2002] n.p. 1995 submitted 6 21Turkmenistan 1997 1997 n.p. 1995 1999 1996 n.p. 1996 n.p. 1999 n.p. n.r. .. ..Uzbekistan 1995 1995 1997 1993 1999 1995 n.p. 1995 n.p. n.p. observer submitted .. ..Viet Nam 1982 1982 1994 1994 [1998] 1994 n.p. 1998 2002 n.p. observer pending 2 20EUROPE 1576 5291Albania 1991 1991 n.p. 1994 n.p. 1994 n.p. 2000 [2001] 2001 2000 pending 1 7Austria 1978 1978 1982 1994 2002 1994 2002 1997 2002 [1998] 1995 submitted 2 64Belarus 1973 1973 1995 2000 n.p. 1993 2002 2001 n.p. 2000 observer pending .. ..Belgium 1983 1983 1983 1996 2002 1996 [2000] 1997 [2001] [1998] 1995 submitted 5 106Bosnia and Herzegovina 1993 1992 2002 2000 n.p. 2002 n.p. 2002 [2001] n.p. observer n.r. .. 1Bulgaria 1970 1970 1991 1995 2002 1996 2000 2001 [2001] [1998] 1996 submitted .. 22Croatia 1992 1991 2000 1996 [1999] 1996 2002 2000 [2001] [1998] 2000 submitted 1 20Czech Rep 1993 1993 1993 1993 2001 1993 2001 2000 2002 [1998] 1995 submitted .. 42Denmark 1972 1972 1977 1993 2002 1993 2002 1995 [2001] 2000 1995 pending 147 216Estonia 1991 1991 1992 1994 [1998] 1994 [2000] n.p. n.p. 2001 1999 pending 1 29Finland 1975 1975 1976 1994 2002 1994 [2000] 1995 2002 [1998] 1995 submitted 88 303France 1980 1980 1978 1994 2002 g 1994 [2000] 1997 [2001] 2002 1995 submitted 15 69Germany 1973 1973 1976 1993 2002 1993 [2000] 1996 2002 [1998] 1995 pending 30 2042Greece 1997 1985 1992 1994 2002 1994 [2000] 1997 [2001] [1998] 1995 submitted 13 39Hungary 1974 1974 1985 1994 2002 1994 [2000] 1999 [2001] 2001 1995 submitted 12 9Iceland 1979 1979 2000 1993 2002 1994 [2001] 1997 2002 [1998] 1995 submitted .. 37Ireland 1989 1989 2002 1994 2002 1996 [2000] 1997 [2001] [1998] 1995 .. 22 29Italy 1978 1978 1979 1994 2002 1994 [2000] 1997 [2001] 2001 1995 submitted 22 429Latvia 1992 1992 1997 1995 2002 1995 n.p. n.p. [2001] 2002 1999 pending 1 5Lithuania 1991 1991 2001 1995 [1998] 1996 [2000] n.p. [2002] 2002 2001 submitted .. 14Macedonia, FYR 1994 1994 2000 1998 n.p. 1997 [2000] 2002 [2001] 1999 observer pending .. ..Moldova, Rep 1993 1993 2001 1995 n.p. 1995 [2001] 1999 [2001] 1999 2001 pending .. ..Netherlands 1978 1978 1984 1993 2002 1994 2002 1995 2002 [1998] 1995 pending 143 100Norway 1972 1972 1976 1993 2002 1993 2001 1996 2002 [1998] 1995 submitted 415 283Poland 1977 1977 1989 1994 [1998] 1996 [2000] 2001 [2001] 2002 1995 submitted 3 70Portugal 1978 1978 1980 1993 2002 1993 [2000] 1996 [2001] [1998] 1995 pending 10 27Romania 1974 1974 1994 1994 2001 1994 [2000] 1998 [2001] 2000 1995 submitted 2 12Russian Federation 1973 1973 1992 1994 [1999] 1995 n.p. n.p. [2002] n.p. observer submitted 5 29Serbia and Montenegro 2001 2001 2002 2001 n.p. 2002 n.p. n.p. [2002] n.p. observer pending .. 20Slovakia 1993 1993 1993 1994 2002 1994 [2000] 2002 2002 n.p. 1995 submitted 3 30Slovenia 1992 1992 2000 1995 2002 1996 [2000] 2001 [2001] [1998] 1995 submitted 1 3Spain 1977 1977 1986 1993 2002 1993 2002 1996 [2001] [1998] 1995 submitted 29 359Sweden 1971 1971 1974 1993 2002 1993 2002 1995 2002 [1998] 1995 submitted 307 289Switzerland 1992 1992 1974 1993 [1998] 1994 2002 1996 [2001] [1998] 1995 pending 2 83Ukraine 1973 1973 1999 1997 [1999] 1995 n.p. 2002 [2001] 1999 observer submitted 10 9United Kingdom 1976 1976 1976 1993 2002 1994 [2000] 1996 [2001] [1998] 1995 pending 285 425MIDDLE EAST & N. AFRICA 8 98Afghanistan 1983 1983 1985 2002 n.p. 2002 n.p. 1995 n.p. n.p. n.p. n.r. .. ..Algeria 1989 1989 1983 1993 n.p. 1995 [2000] 1996 [2001] n.p. observer pending .. 3Egypt 1982 1982 1978 1994 [1999] 1994 [2000] 1995 [2002] n.p. 1995 submitted 1 7Iran, Islamic Rep 1975 1975 1976 1996 n.p. 1996 [2001] 1997 [2001] n.p. n.p. pending .. 2Iraq 1971 1971 n.p. n.p. n.p. n.p. n.p. n.p. n.p. n.p. n.p. pending .. ..Israel 1991 1991 1979 1996 [1998] 1995 n.p. 1996 [2001] n.p. 1995 submitted .. 3Jordan 1975 1975 1978 1993 n.p. 1993 [2000] 1996 [2002] n.p. 2000 submitted .. 4Kuwait 1996 1996 2002 1994 n.p. 2002 n.p. 1997 [2001] n.p. 1995 n.r. .. 1Lebanon 1972 1972 n.p. 1994 n.p. 1994 n.p. 1996 [2001] n.p. observer pending .. 6Libyan Arab Jamahiriya 1970 1970 n.p. 1999 n.p. 2001 n.p. 1996 n.p. n.p. n.p. n.r. .. 2Morocco 1979 1979 1975 1995 2002 1995 [2000] 1996 [2001] n.p. 1995 submitted 3 5Oman n.p. n.p. n.p. 1995 n.p. 1995 n.p. 1996 [2002] n.p. 2000 n.r. .. 1Saudi Arabia n.p. n.p. 1996 1994 n.p. 2001 n.p. 1997 [2002] n.p. observer submitted .. 4Syrian Arab Rep 1969 1969 n.p. 1996 n.p. 1996 n.p. 1997 [2002] n.p. n.p. submitted .. 2Tunisia 1969 1969 1974 1993 n.p. 1993 [2001] 1995 [2001] n.p. 1995 submitted 1 1Turkey [2000] [2000] 1996 n.p. n.p. 1997 [2000] 1998 [2001] n.p. 1995 submitted 3 50United Arab Emirates n.p. n.p. 1990 1995 n.p. 2000 n.p. 1998 2002 n.p. 1996 n.r. .. 2Yemen 1987 1987 1997 1996 n.p. 1996 n.p. 1997 [2001] n.p. observer n.r. .. 2

Year of Ratification of Major Multilateral Agreements(year in brackets = country is signatory to treaty; "n.p."= country is not a party to treaty)

Agenda 21 Process

Rights

CCD {d}(desert-

ification)

Number ofMunicipalities

Involvedin Local

Agenda 21

Covenanton Civil

andPolitical

Covenanton Economic,

Social, andCulturalRights

Data Table 2 Global Governance: Participation in Major Multilateral AgreementsSources: Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Convention on the International Trade in Endangered Species,United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Convention on Biodiversity, United Nations Convention to Combat Desertifica-tion, Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, World Trade Organization,United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development, International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives.

238W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 2 – 2 0 0 4

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (12)

Year ofWTO {f} National

CBD Member- ReportingCITES UNFCCC Kyoto {c} Bio- Stock- ship Status in

{a} {b} Proto- (bio- Safety holm Con- Aarhus (or status 2002(species (climate col diver- Proto- vention Con- of mem- (n.r.= non-trade) change) (CO2) sity) col (POPs) {e} vention bership) reporting) 1996 2001

SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA 35 133Angola 1992 1992 n.p. 2000 n.p. 1998 n.p. 1997 n.p. n.p. 1996 n.r. .. ..Benin 1992 1992 1984 1994 2002 1994 [2000] 1996 [2001] n.p. 1996 submitted .. 1Botswana 2000 n.p. 1977 1994 n.p. 1995 2002 1996 n.p. n.p. 1995 pending .. ..Burkina Faso 1999 1999 1989 1993 n.p. 1993 [2000] 1996 [2001] n.p. 1995 submitted .. ..Burundi 1990 1990 1988 1997 2001 1997 n.p. 1997 [2002] n.p. 1995 n.r. .. 2Cameroon 1984 1984 1981 1994 2002 1994 [2001] 1997 [2001] n.p. 1995 pending .. 1Central African Rep 1981 1981 1980 1995 n.p. 1995 [2000] 1996 [2002] n.p. 1995 n.r. .. ..Chad 1995 1995 1989 1994 n.p. 1994 [2000] 1996 [2002] n.p. 1996 n.r. .. ..Congo 1983 1983 1983 1996 n.p. 1996 [2000] 1999 [2001] n.p. 1997 n.r. .. ..Congo, Dem Rep 1976 1976 1976 1995 n.p. 1994 n.p. 1997 n.p. n.p. 1997 submitted .. 2Côte d'Ivoire 1992 1992 1994 1994 n.p. 1994 n.p. 1997 [2001] n.p. 1995 pending .. ..Equatorial Guinea 1987 1987 1992 2000 2000 1994 n.p. 1997 n.p. n.p. n.p. n.r. .. ..Eritrea 2002 2001 1994 1995 n.p. 1996 n.p. 1996 n.p. n.p. n.p. n.r. .. ..Ethiopia 1993 1993 1989 1994 n.p. 1994 [2000] 1997 [2002] n.p. observer n.r. .. ..Gabon 1983 1983 1989 1998 n.p. 1997 n.p. 1996 [2002] n.p. 1995 n.r. .. 1Gambia 1979 1978 1977 1994 2001 1994 [2000] 1996 [2001] n.p. 1996 submitted .. ..Ghana 2000 2000 1975 1995 n.p. 1994 n.p. 1996 [2001] n.p. 1995 submitted 1 3Guinea 1978 1978 1981 1993 2000 1993 [2000] 1997 [2001] n.p. 1995 n.r. .. ..Guinea-Bissau [2000] 1992 1990 1995 n.p. 1995 n.p. 1995 [2002] n.p. 1995 pending .. ..Kenya 1972 1972 1978 1994 n.p. 1994 2002 1997 [2001] n.p. 1995 pending 4 11Lesotho 1992 1992 [1974] 1995 2000 1995 2001 1995 2002 n.p. 1995 n.r. .. ..Liberia [1967] [1967] 1981 [1992] n.p. 2000 2002 1998 2002 n.p. n.p. n.r. .. ..Madagascar 1971 1971 1975 1999 n.p. 1996 [2000] 1997 [2001] n.p. 1995 submitted .. 5Malawi 1993 1993 1982 1994 2001 1994 [2000] 1996 [2002] n.p. 1995 submitted 6 4Mali 1974 1974 1994 1994 2002 1995 2002 1995 [2001] n.p. 1995 n.r. .. 2Mauritania n.p. n.p. 1998 1994 n.p. 1996 n.p. 1996 [2001] n.p. 1995 n.r. .. 1Mozambique 1993 n.p. 1981 1995 n.p. 1995 2002 1997 [2001] n.p. 1995 n.r. 2 2Namibia 1994 1994 1990 1995 n.p. 1997 [2000] 1997 n.p. n.p. 1995 submitted .. 5Niger 1986 1986 1975 1995 [1998] 1995 [2000] 1996 [2001] n.p. 1996 pending .. ..Nigeria 1993 1993 1974 1994 n.p. 1994 [2000] 1997 [2001] n.p. 1995 pending 1 5Rwanda 1975 1975 1980 1998 n.p. 1996 [2000] 1998 2002 n.p. 1996 n.r. .. 1Senegal 1978 1978 1977 1994 2001 1994 [2000] 1995 [2001] n.p. 1995 submitted 1 3Sierra Leone 1996 1996 1994 1995 n.p. 1994 n.p. 1997 n.p. n.p. 1995 n.r. .. ..Somalia 1990 1990 1985 n.p. n.p. n.p. n.p. 2002 n.p. n.p. n.p. n.r. .. ..South Africa 1998 [1994] 1975 1997 2002 1995 n.p. 1997 2002 n.p. 1995 pending 10 20Sudan 1976 1986 1982 1993 n.p. 1995 n.p. 1995 [2001] n.p. observer n.r. .. 1Tanzania, United Rep 1976 1976 1979 1996 2002 1996 n.p. 1997 [2001] n.p. 1995 pending 3 13Togo 1984 1984 1978 1995 n.p. 1995 [2000] 1995 [2001] n.p. 1995 n.r. .. 2Uganda 1995 1987 1991 1993 2002 1993 2001 1997 n.p. n.p. 1995 submitted 2 5Zambia 1984 1984 1980 1993 [1998] 1993 n.p. 1996 [2001] n.p. 1995 n.r. 1 4Zimbabwe 1991 1991 1981 1992 n.p. 1994 [2001] 1997 [2001] n.p. 1995 pending 4 39NORTH AMERICA 26 101Canada 1976 1976 1975 1992 [1998] 1992 [2001] 1995 2001 n.p. 1995 pending 7 14United States 1992 [1977] 1974 1992 [1998] [1993] n.p. 2000 [2001] n.p. 1995 submitted 19 87C. AMERICA & CARIBBEAN .. 26Belize 1996 [2000] 1986 1994 n.p. 1993 n.p. 1998 [2002] n.p. 1995 n.r. .. ..Costa Rica 1968 1968 1975 1994 2002 1994 [2000] 1998 [2002] n.p. 1995 pending .. 4Cuba n.p. n.p. 1990 1994 2002 1994 2002 1997 [2001] n.p. 1995 submitted .. 2Dominican Rep 1978 1978 1986 1998 2002 1996 n.p. 1997 [2001] n.p. 1995 pending .. ..El Salvador 1979 1979 1987 1995 1998 1994 [2000] 1997 [2001] n.p. 1995 submitted .. ..Guatemala 1992 1988 1979 1995 1999 1995 n.p. 1998 [2002] n.p. 1995 n.r. .. ..Haiti 1991 n.p. n.p. 1996 n.p. 1996 [2000] 1996 [2001] n.p. 1996 submitted .. ..Honduras 1997 1981 1985 1995 2000 1995 [2000] 1997 [2002] n.p. 1995 submitted .. 6Jamaica 1975 1975 1997 1995 1999 1995 [2001] 1997 [2001] n.p. 1995 pending .. 5Mexico 1981 1981 1991 1993 2000 1993 2002 1995 [2001] n.p. 1995 submitted .. 2Nicaragua 1980 1980 1977 1995 1999 1995 2002 1998 [2001] n.p. 1995 submitted .. 5Panama 1977 1977 1978 1995 1999 1995 2002 1996 [2001] n.p. 1997 pending .. ..Trinidad and Tobago 1978 1978 1984 1994 1999 1996 2000 2000 n.p. n.p. 1995 n.r. .. 1SOUTH AMERICA 34 93Argentina 1986 1986 1981 1994 2001 1994 [2000] 1997 [2001] n.p. 1995 submitted .. 1Bolivia 1982 1982 1979 1994 1999 1994 2002 1996 [2001] n.p. 1995 pending 13 1Brazil 1992 1992 1975 1994 2002 1994 n.p. 1997 [2001] n.p. 1995 submitted 8 36Chile 1972 1972 1975 1994 2002 1994 [2000] 1997 [2001] n.p. 1995 submitted 1 15Colombia 1969 1969 1981 1995 2001 1994 [2000] 1999 [2001] n.p. 1995 submitted 4 6Ecuador 1969 1969 1975 1993 2000 1993 [2000] 1995 [2001] n.p. 1996 submitted 3 13Guyana 1977 1977 1977 1994 n.p. 1994 n.p. 1997 n.p. n.p. 1995 pending .. 1Paraguay 1992 1992 1976 1994 1999 1994 [2001] 1997 [2001] n.p. 1995 submitted .. ..Peru 1978 1978 1975 1993 [1998] 1993 [2000] 1995 [2001] n.p. 1995 submitted 5 17Suriname 1976 1976 1980 1996 n.p. 1996 n.p. 2000 [2002] n.p. 1995 pending .. ..Uruguay 1970 1970 1975 1994 2001 1993 [2001] 1999 [2001] n.p. 1995 pending .. ..Venezuela 1978 1978 1977 1994 n.p. 1994 2002 1998 [2001] n.p. 1995 submitted .. 3OCEANIA 44 213Australia 1980 1975 1976 1992 [1998] 1993 n.p. 2000 [2001] n.p. 1995 pending 40 176Fiji n.p. n.p. 1997 1993 1998 1993 2001 1998 2001 n.p. 1996 submitted .. ..New Zealand 1978 1978 1989 1993 [1998] 1993 [2000] 2000 [2001] n.p. 1995 pending 3 37Papua New Guinea n.p. n.p. 1975 1993 2002 1993 n.p. 2000 [2001] n.p. 1996 n.r. 1 ..Solomon Islands n.p. 1982 n.p. 1994 [1998] 1995 n.p. 1999 n.p. n.p. 1996 n.r. .. ..DEVELOPED 1681 5738DEVELOPING 131 678Data in brackets indicate that a treaty is not yet ratified and show the year in which a country has signed a treaty. Years without brackets show the year of ratification of a major multilateralagreement. This table shows the status of agreements as of September 2002. a. Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species. b. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. c. The United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity. d. The United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification. e. Persistent Organic Pollutants.f. The World Trade Organization. g. Excludes overseas territories.

Involvedin Local

Agenda 21

Number ofMunicipalities

Agenda 21 ProcessYear of Ratification of Major Multilateral Agreements(year in brackets = country is signatory to treaty; "n.p."= country is not a party to treaty)

Covenanton Civil

andPoliticalRights

Covenanton Economic,

Social, andCulturalRights

CCD {d}(desert-

ification)

239P a r t I I : D a t a T a b l e s

Data Table 2 continuedMore data tables are available. Log on to http://earthtrends.wri.org/datatables/governance or send an e-mail [emailprotected] with “Instructions” in the message body.

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (13)

TECHNICAL NOTES The ten treaties described below are a small subset of the hun-dreds of multilateral agreements drafted in recent decades atthe global level. The table indicates the year that a country haseither signed or ratified a particular agreement. By signing atreaty, a state recognizes the authentic text, intends to com-plete the procedures for becoming legally bound by it, and iscommitted not to act against the treaty’s objectives before rati-fication. Ratification (or its equivalents of acceptance,approval, or accession) binds the state to observe the treaty.Depending on a country’s system of governance, signing thetreaty may be simply an executive decision while ratificationrequires legislative approval. Treaties vary both in internationallevels of participation and the extent to which they are legallybinding. To a large extent, compliance lies with the individualcountries and depends on informed self-interest, peer pressurefrom other countries, and public opinion. Effectiveness of anyinternational convention or treaty is determined not only by thenumber of country ratifications, but also by the rigor of itsimplementation, monitoring, and enforcement.

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.This covenant details the basic civil and political rights of indi-viduals and nations. The rights of nations include: the right toself determination, and the right to own, trade, and dispose oftheir property freely, and not be deprived of their means of sub-sistence. Among the rights of individuals are the right to life;the right to liberty and freedom of movement; the right to equal-ity before the law; the right to presumption of innocence untilproven guilty; the right to appeal a conviction; the right to pri-vacy; freedom of thought, conscience, and religion; freedom ofopinion and expression; and freedom of assembly and associa-tion. For more information, please see http://www.hrweb.org/legal/undocs.html.

The International Covenant on Economic, Social, andCultural Rights.This covenant describes the basic economic,social, and cultural rights of individuals and nations, includingthe rights to self-determination; wages sufficient to support aminimum standard of living; equal pay for equal work; equalopportunity for advancement; form trade unions; strike; paid orotherwise compensated maternity leave; free primary educa-tion and accessible education at all levels; and copyright,patent, and trademark protection for intellectual property. Inaddition, this convention forbids exploitation of children, andrequires all nations to cooperate to end world hunger. For moreinformation, please see http://www.hrweb.org/legal/undocs.html.

CITES:The Convention on International Trade in EndangeredSpecies of Wild Fauna and Flora, or CITES, is an internationalagreement between governments to ensure that the survival ofwild animals and plants is not threatened by international trade.It has been in force for almost 30 years; today, it accords varyingdegrees of protection to more than 30,000 species of animalsand plants, whether they are traded as live specimens, fur coats,or dried herbs. CITES is legally binding on countries that havejoined the Convention and provides a framework to berespected by each Party, which has to adopt its own domesticlegislation to make sure that CITES is implemented at thenational level. More information is available athttp://www.cites.org.

UNFCCC:The United Nations Framework Convention on Cli-mate Change (UNFCCC) is the centerpiece of global efforts tocombat global warming. Adopted in 1992 at the Rio Earth Sum-mit, its ultimate objective is the “stabilization of greenhousegas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would pre-vent dangerous anthropogenic (human-made) interference withthe climate system. Such a level should be achieved within a

time-frame sufficient to allow ecosystems to adapt naturally toclimate change, to ensure that food production is not threat-ened and to enable economic development to proceed in a sus-tainable manner.” For more information, please consult theUNFCCC Secretariat at http://www.unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf.

Kyoto Protocol:The Kyoto Protocol was established in 1997by the third session of the Conference of Parties (COP-3) tothe UNFCCC. With ratification, developed countries committhemselves to reducing their collective emissions of six green-house gases. Emissions need to be at least 5 percent lowerthan 1990 levels by a deadline ranging from 2008 to 2012. Com-pared to emissions levels that would be expected by 2010 with-out emissions-control measures, the Protocol target representsa 30 percent cut. Both developed and developing countriesagree to take measures to limit emissions and promote adapta-tion to future climate change impacts; submit information ontheir national climate change program and inventories; promotetechnology transfer; cooperate on scientific and publicresearch; and promote public awareness, education, and train-ing. The rules for entry into force of the Kyoto Protocol require55 Parties to the Convention to ratify the Protocol, includingAnnex I Parties accounting for 55 percent of that group’s car-bon dioxide emissions in 1990. As of September 2002, 94 coun-tries had ratified the Protocol, but only 37 percent of Annex I(industrialized country) emissions were represented. Moreinformation is available in A Guide to the Climate Change Con-vention Process, on-line at http://www.unfccc.int/resource/process/guideprocess-p.pdf.

CBD:The United Nations Convention on Biological Diversityis one of the key agreements adopted at the 1992 Earth Summitin Rio de Janeiro. The Convention establishes three main goals:the conservation of biodiversity, sustainable use of the compo-nents of biodiversity, and sharing the benefits arising from thecommercial and other utilization of genetic resources in a fairand equitable way. The convention is legally binding; countriesthat join it are obliged to implement its provisions, such asreporting on what has been done to implement the accord andthe effectiveness of these activities. The national reports, par-ticularly when seen together, are one of the key tools for track-ing progress in meeting the Convention’s objectives. Moreinformation is available on-line at http://www.biodiv.org/doc/publications/guide.asp.

Biosafety Protocol: Adopted in January 2000 as a subsidiaryagreement to the CBD, the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafetyallows governments to signal whether or not they are willing toaccept imports of agricultural commodities that include LivingModified Organisms (LMOs). Living Modified Organisms—often known as genetically modified organisms (GMOs)—arebecoming part of an increasing number of products, includingfoods and food additives, beverages, drugs, adhesives, andfuels. In addition, the treaty deals with access to and sharing ofthe benefits from commercial use of genetic material, such aspharmaceutical products. More information is available on-lineat http://www.biodiv.org/doc/publications/guide.asp.

CCD:The United Nations Convention to Combat Desertifica-tion is an international Convention dedicated to addressing theproblems of land degradation in the world’s drylands, causedprimarily by human activities and climatic variations. Since theConvention entered into force in 1996, countries affected bydesertification are implementing the Convention by developingand carrying out national, sub-regional, and regional action pro-grams. The Convention states that these programs must adopta democratic, bottom-up approach designed to allow local peo-ple to help themselves reverse land degradation. More informa-tion is available at http://www.unccd.int/main.php.

240W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 2 – 2 0 0 4

Data Table 2 continued

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (14)

Stockholm Convention:The Stockholm Convention on Per-sistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) is a global treaty to protecthuman health and the environment from POPs, which remainintact in the environment for long periods of time, becomewidely distributed geographically, accumulate in the fatty tis-sue of living organisms, and are toxic to humans and wildlife.The Convention was adopted in May 2001. Upon signature ofthe Convention, the first step toward implementation is thedevelopment of national action plans to eliminate or reduce therelease of POPs into the environment. For more information,please consult the Stockholm Convention website athttp://www.pops.int.

Year of World Trade Organization Membership indicatesthe year in which a country joined the World Trade Organization(WTO). The WTO began in 1995, expanding on the internationaltrade rules set forth by its predecessor, the General Agreementon Tariffs and Trade (GATT). The WTO’s purpose is to helptrade flow as freely as possible without any undesirable sideeffects and to ensure that trade rules and tariffs are transpar-ent and equitable among nations. It also serves as a forum fortrade negotiations and dispute settlements. In theory, any stateor customs territory having full autonomy in the conduct of itstrade policies may join the WTO, after lengthy negotiationsconcerning market access, tariff rates, and other policies ingoods and services. Governments marked as “observers” areexpected to start accession negotiations within five years ofbecoming observers.

Aarhus Convention:The UN Economic Commission forEurope (UNECE) Convention on Access to Information, PublicParticipation in Decision-making and Access to Justice inEnvironmental Matters, or Aarhus Convention, was firstadopted in June 1998. The Convention is open to the 55 mem-bers of the UNECE as well as to non-member states. Accordingto UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, “Although regional inscope…the Aarhus Convention is global. It is by far the mostimpressive elaboration of principle 10 of the Rio Declaration,which stresses the need for citizen’s participation in environ-mental issues and for access to information on the environmentheld by public authorities…” The Convention will include regu-lar reporting requirements and biennial meetings among mem-ber states. More information is available on-line at http://www.unece.org/env/pp.

Agenda 21, created as a result of the 1992 Earth Summit, is acomprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally,and locally by organizations of the United Nations system, gov-ernments, and major groups in every area with human impactson the environment.

National Agenda 21 Reporting Status indicates if a countryhas submitted a report on the status of its implementation ofAgenda 21 in relation to the specific themes. Countries withreports “pending” submission are participants in the Agenda 21process that have not yet submitted reports in 2002. “Non-reporting” countries are not participating in the Agenda 21process. Country reports focus on social, economic, and envi-ronmental issues, including: combating poverty; energy; health;transport; agriculture; atmosphere; biodiversity; forests; fresh-water; hazardous, solid, and radioactive wastes; land manage-ment; oceans; and toxic chemicals.

Local Agenda 21 Municipalities:The number of municipali-ties involved in the Local Agenda 21 (LA21) process denotesthe number of government authorities that have made a formalcommitment to LA21 or are actively undertaking the process.

As part of the Agenda 21 process, local governments are calledto create their own agenda outlining local priorities. The follow-ing criteria were used to identify local authorities undertakingthe LA21 process: The International Council for Local Environ-mental Initiatives (ICLEI) conducted two separate surveys ofglobal LA21 participation—in 1996 and in 2001. While the datacan provide a rough approximation of the number of municipali-ties involved in LA21s, it does not indicate either (1) the extentof a municipality’s involvement or (2) the size of the municipal-ity. Many of the local participants were “self-reported” adher-ents to LA21 practices, introducing some degree of reportingbias. The survey did not have a clearly defined sample size, sorigorous statistical analysis of the results is not possible.

SOURCESCovenants for Human Rights (Civil and Political; Eco-nomic, Social and Cultural): Office of the United NationsHigh Commissioner for Human Rights (UNHCHR). 2002. Statusof Ratifications of the Principal International Human RightsTreaties. Geneva: UNHCHR. Available on-line at http://www.unhchr.ch/pdf/report.pdf. CITES: Convention on Interna-tional Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora.2002. List of Contracting Parties. Geneva: CITES Secretariat.Available on-line at http://www.cites.org/eng/parties/alphabet.shtml. UNFCCC: United Nations Framework Con-vention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2001. UNFCCC Statusof Ratification. Bonn: UNFCCC. Available on-line at http://unfccc.int/resource/conv/ratlist.pdf. Kyoto Protocol:UNFCCC. 2002. Kyoto Protocol Status of Ratification. Bonn:UNFCCC. Available on-line at http://www.unfccc.int/resource/kpstats.pdf. CBD and the Biosafety Protocol:Convention on Biodiversity. 2002. Parties to the Convention onBiological Diversity/Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Montréal:CBD. Available on-line at http://www.biodiv.org/doc/publications/guide.asp. CCD: United Nations Secretariat ofthe Convention to Combat Desertification. 2002. Status of Rati-fication and Entry into Force of the UNCCD. Bonn: UNCCDSecretariat. Available on-line at http://www.unccd.int/convention/ratif/doeif.php. Stockholm Convention: Stock-holm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs).2002. List of Signatories and Parties to the StockholmConvention. Nairobi: UNEP. Available on-line at http://www.pops.int/documents/signature/. Aarhus Convention:United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE).2002. Convention on Access to Information, Public Participationin Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Mat-ters: Participants. Geneva: UNECE. Available on-line at http://www.unece.org/env/pp/ctreaty.htm. WTO Membership:World Trade Organization (WTO). 2002. Organization Membersand Observers. Geneva: WTO. Available on-line at http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/org6_e.htm.

National Agenda 21 Reporting: United Nations Commissionon Sustainable Development (UNCSD). 2002. National Imple-mentation of Agenda 21: The Report. New York: UNCSD. Avail-able on-line at http://www.un.org/esa/agenda21/natlinfo/wssd/NIA_REPORT.pdf. Agenda 21 Municipalities: Inter-national Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI).2001. Second Local Agenda 21 Survey: Background Paper Number15. New York: United Nations Department of Economic andSocial Affairs (UNDESA). International Council for Local Envi-ronmental Initiatives (ICLEI) in cooperation with the UnitedNations Department for Policy Coordination and SustainableDevelopment (UNDPCSD). 1997. A Study of Responses by LocalAuthorities and Their National and International Associations toAgenda 21. Toronto: ICLEI.

241P a r t I I : D a t a T a b l e s

Data Table 2 continued

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (15)

Exports Balance Externalas a of Trade Debt

Percent (million as aof current Percent

GDP $US) of GNI Public Edu- Million as a % Parent Foreign 1988- 1998- 1998- 1998- 1998- Health cation Current of Corpor- Affil-

1990 {a} 2000 {a} 2000 {a} 2000 {a} 2000 {a} 1998 1998 $US GNI ations iatesWORLD 180,445 918,158 23 .. .. .. 5.4 4.5 59,073 .. 63,312 821,818 22,897ASIA (EXCL. MIDDLE EAST) 13,703 76,746 22 c 184,697 c .. 1.5 4.6 3.5 .. .. 9,434 452,675 7,723Armenia .. 161 21 (567) 46 4.4 3.1 2.0 189 10.0 .. 1,604 ..Azerbaijan .. 554 31 (639) 22 2.7 0.9 3.4 136 3.0 .. 2 ..Bangladesh 2 217 14 (2,389) 35 1.3 1.7 .. 1,217 2.7 .. 161 ..Bhutan 0 0 31 (101) 42 .. 3.2 .. 59 13.1 .. 2 ..Cambodia 0 130 37 (283) 75 2.4 0.6 5.5 338 11.3 .. 598 ..China 3,358 40,301 23 33,802 16 2.1 2.0 .. 2,189 0.2 379 364,345 510Georgia .. 159 28 (508) 48 0.9 d 0.9 .. 195 6.2 .. 190 ..India 168 2,373 12 (12,250) 23 2.4 .. .. 1,529 0.4 187 1,416 257Indonesia {e} 784 (2,550) 42 10,885 118 1.1 0.8 1.4 f 1,747 1.4 313 2,241 77Japan 86 7,935 10 c 70,716 c .. 1.0 5.7 3.5 f .. .. 217 1,106 5,556Kazakhstan .. 1,329 44 499 32 0.7 3.5 .. 195 1.1 .. 1,865 ..Korea, Dem People's Rep .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 128 .. .. .. 26Korea, Rep 973 8,010 46 27,751 33 2.8 2.4 4.1 (101) (0.0) 7,460 6,486 544Kyrgyzstan .. 50 41 (231) 110 1.9 2.9 5.4 241 18.7 .. 4,004 ..Lao People's Dem Rep 4 66 36 g (145) g 162 .. 1.2 2.4 f 286 20.1 .. 669 ..Malaysia 1,573 1,792 121 18,212 53 1.9 1.4 .. 133 0.2 .. 15,567 174Mongolia .. 27 61 (137) 87 2.5 .. .. 215 22.9 .. 1,400 ..Myanmar 56 274 0 c .. .. 1.7 0.2 .. f 87 .. .. 299 ..Nepal 3 7 23 (446) 54 0.9 d 1.3 2.5 383 7.3 .. 224 ..Pakistan 213 449 16 (2,624) 54 4.5 1.0 .. f 830 1.4 59 644 4Philippines 676 1,630 53 127 64 1.2 1.5 3.2 f 635 0.8 .. 14,802 46Singapore 4,039 6,634 168 16,517 .. 4.8 1.2 .. 1 0.0 .. 24,114 100Sri Lanka 36 181 37 (1,309) 59 4.5 d 1.4 .. 349 2.2 .. 305 2Tajikistan .. 25 63 (61) 110 1.2 5.2 .. 124 11.8 .. .. ..Thailand 1,775 5,631 61 14,347 76 1.6 1.9 4.7 785 0.7 .. 2,721 310Turkmenistan .. 130 g 45 (414) .. 3.8 4.1 .. 26 0.8 .. .. ..Uzbekistan .. 120 37 111 41 .. 3.4 .. 167 1.9 .. 4 ..Viet Nam 9 1,460 .. .. 69 .. 0.8 .. 1,435 4.9 .. 1,544 9EUROPE 80,031 445,655 34 121,923 .. 2.0 6.5 5.2 .. .. 38,595 299,691 10,926Albania .. 76 15 (782) 22 1.2 3.5 .. 356 9.9 .. 2,422 ..Austria 559 5,578 44 c (1,145) c .. 0.8 5.8 6.3 .. .. 896 2,464 203Belarus .. 246 62 (788) 4 1.3 4.6 5.6 39 0.1 .. 393 ..Belgium 2,804 13,188 80 9,055 .. 1.4 6.1 .. .. .. .. .. 130Bosnia and Herzegovina .. 0 h 28 (1,486) .. 4.2 7.9 .. 906 19.5 .. 7 ..Bulgaria 1 782 50 (663) 88 3.0 3.5 3.4 274 2.3 26 918 ..Croatia .. 1,112 42 (1,600) 55 3.0 .. .. 51 0.3 70 353 8Czech Rep 155 4,865 64 (1,163) 43 2.0 6.5 4.2 404 0.8 660 71,385 116Denmark 908 17,660 38 6,855 .. 1.5 6.8 8.2 .. .. 9,356 2,305 580Estonia .. 424 80 (359) 57 1.6 .. 6.8 79 1.6 .. 3,066 18Finland 611 8,601 40 11,419 .. 1.3 5.3 .. .. .. 1,200 2,006 508France {i} 10,659 39,772 27 30,604 .. 2.6 7.3 5.9 .. .. 1,695 9,494 710Germany 3,567 89,422 31 20,138 .. 1.5 7.8 4.7 .. .. 8,492 12,042 1,260Greece 888 825 h 20 c (10,736) c .. 4.9 4.7 .. .. .. .. 798 j 42Hungary 0 1,902 55 (1,353) 63 1.5 5.2 4.6 247 0.5 .. 28,772 164Iceland (7) 120 35 c (380) c .. .. 7.0 7.1 .. .. 78 47 2Ireland 268 17,476 87 c 11,328 c .. 0.7 5.2 4.5 .. .. 39 1,140 163Italy 5,126 7,584 27 25,758 .. 2.1 5.5 4.7 f .. .. 806 1,769 521Latvia .. 371 47 (706) 47 1.0 d 4.1 6.8 96 1.5 .. 107 4Lithuania .. 597 44 (1,033) 44 1.8 4.9 6.4 122 1.2 16 1,893 10Macedonia, FYR .. 108 43 (503) 39 2.1 5.3 .. 207 5.8 .. .. ..Moldova, Rep {k} .. 82 50 (317) 73 0.4 4.3 .. 90 6.7 .. .. ..Netherlands 8,005 44,494 61 c 20,264 c .. 1.6 6.0 4.9 .. .. 1,608 2,259 l 784Norway 934 6,046 41 12,285 .. 1.8 7.1 7.7 .. .. 900 3,100 227Poland 38 7,659 27 (9,692) 38 1.9 4.2 5.4 1,153 0.7 58 35,840 66Portugal 1,756 3,464 31 (11,718) .. 2.1 5.1 5.7 f .. .. 1,100 3,500 47Romania 0 1,366 29 (2,348) 28 2.1 3.1 4.4 395 1.1 20 71,318 5Russian Federation 0 2,929 40 32,498 63 m 3.6 .. .. 1,529 0.7 .. 7,793 3Serbia and Montenegro 33 0 32 n (1,589) n .. 5.9 d .. 4.2 628 6.9 .. .. 2Slovakia 0 990 65 (1,289) 47 1.8 d 5.7 4.3 196 1.0 .. 5,560 36Slovenia .. 202 56 (610) .. 1.2 6.7 5.8 45 0.2 .. 1,195 88Spain 9,811 21,156 28 (6,819) .. 1.3 d 5.4 4.5 .. .. 857 7,465 600Sweden 1,823 33,641 45 13,779 .. 2.1 6.6 8.0 .. .. 5,118 4,324 1,370Switzerland 2,804 13,188 41 c 11,833 c .. 1.1 7.6 5.5 .. .. 4,506 5,774 690Ukraine .. 611 52 726 34 3.6 3.6 4.5 525 1.6 .. 7,362 ..United Kingdom 29,240 98,820 27 (21,434) .. 2.5 o 5.7 4.7 .. .. 1,094 2,683 2,534MIDDLE EAST & N. AFRICA .. .. 31 (876) .. 6.0 .. .. 5,731 0.7 4,925 7,898 340Afghanistan .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 146 .. .. 3 4Algeria 8 7 31 3,932 60 3.5 d 2.6 6.0 215 0.5 .. 6 ..Egypt 1,058 1,125 16 (7,509) 36 2.3 .. .. 1,622 1.8 .. 99 78Iran, Islamic Rep (107) 33 24 5,794 10 3.8 p 1.7 4.6 152 0.1 .. 16 12Iraq .. .. .. .. .. .. 3.8 .. 98 .. .. .. ..Israel 182 3,014 36 (8,649) .. 8.0 6.0 7.7 924 0.9 4,334 3,321 60Jordan {q} 20 342 44 (1,728) 109 9.5 3.6 .. f 465 5.8 .. 8 16Kuwait .. 49 49 3,305 .. 8.2 .. 6.5 f 5 0.0 .. 6 ..Lebanon 3 249 12 (4,524) 51 3.6 2.2 2.1 210 1.2 .. 24 5Libyan Arab Jamahiriya .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. f 10 .. .. .. ..Morocco 139 8 30 (1,613) 56 4.2 1.2 .. 543 1.6 .. 156 4Oman 115 48 .. .. .. 9.7 2.9 3.9 f 43 .. 92 351 2Saudi Arabia .. .. 42 22,224 .. 11.6 .. .. 28 0.0 .. 1,461 r 6Syrian Arab Rep 89 94 34 202 151 5.5 0.9 .. 181 1.2 .. 5 3Tunisia 72 584 43 (607) 57 1.7 2.2 7.6 208 1.1 142 2,086 3Turkey 567 902 24 (9,356) 54 4.9 3.5 .. 118 0.1 357 136 91United Arab Emirates .. .. .. .. .. 2.6 d 0.8 2.0 4 .. .. 59 48Yemen (44) (205) 38 (212) 84 5.2 2.0 6.7 345 5.3 .. 4 ..

Investment, Government

(million Percent of GDP

Military

Foreign Direct

Net Inflows

2000

1994-2000 {b}1998-2000 {a}current $US) {a}

CorporationsReceiptsExpenditure as a

Number of Off'l. DevelopmentTransnationalAssistance (ODA)

With ISOations

Corpor-

2000

14000Certification

(number)

Data Table 3 Financial Flows, Government Expenditures, and CorporationsSources: The World Bank, Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development,International Standards Organization.

242W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 2 – 2 0 0 4

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (16)

Exports Balance Externalas a of Trade Debt

Percent (million as aof current Percent

GDP $US) of GNI Public Edu- Million as a % Parent Foreign 1988- 1998- 1998- 1998- 1998- Health cation Current of Corpor- Affil-

1990 {a} 2000 {a} 2000 {a} 2000 {a} 2000 {a} 1998 1998 $US GNI ations iatesSUB-SAHARAN AFRICA .. 6,903 30 (7,167) 70 2.1 2.5 5.2 12,413 4.1 966 4,413 143Angola (1) 1,761 78 (90) 306 21.2 s .. 2.6 343 10.3 .. 21 ..Benin 1 36 17 (280) 72 .. 1.6 2.6 220 9.9 .. 5 ..Botswana 59 54 31 c (110) c 9 3.7 2.5 9.1 66 1.4 .. 8 ..Burkina Faso 0 11 12 (431) 57 1.6 1.3 3.0 378 16.0 .. 8 ..Burundi 1 5 9 (90) 137 5.4 0.6 3.9 81 11.0 .. 3 ..Cameroon (44) 40 27 149 109 1.3 1.1 2.6 413 4.9 .. 47 ..Central African Rep (1) 8 14 (50) 86 .. 2.0 1.9 104 10.3 .. 4 ..Chad 7 15 17 (225) 70 .. 2.3 1.7 162 10.5 .. 3 ..Congo 3 8 72 455 303 .. 2.0 4.7 80 4.7 .. 20 ..Congo, Dem Rep (7) 1 .. .. .. .. .. .. 147 2.5 .. 4 ..Côte d'Ivoire 39 270 44 689 131 .. 1.2 4.2 533 5.3 .. 91 ..Equatorial Guinea 4 88 97 84 67 .. .. 1.8 22 4.9 .. 1 ..Eritrea .. 34 14 (483) 32 .. .. 5.0 164 21.8 .. .. ..Ethiopia 5 134 15 (851) 111 .. 1.7 4.3 665 10.4 .. 21 ..Gabon 59 47 43 160 99 .. 2.1 3.3 35 0.9 .. 33 ..Gambia 5 14 48 (61) 109 1.1 1.9 4.9 40 9.7 .. 5 ..Ghana 12 76 38 (1,122) 98 1.0 1.8 4.0 640 9.9 .. 54 ..Guinea 15 48 23 (154) 99 1.5 2.3 1.8 250 7.6 .. .. ..Guinea-Bissau 1 1 24 (47) 475 .. .. 0.0 76 38.2 .. 1 ..Kenya 40 45 26 (815) 63 1.8 2.4 6.6 433 4.1 .. 96 2Lesotho 17 182 26 (634) 61 .. .. 13.0 46 4.0 .. 411 ..Liberia 0 13 .. .. .. .. .. .. 78 .. .. .. ..Madagascar 13 53 24 (328) 122 1.2 p 1.1 1.9 f 392 10.6 .. 17 ..Malawi 0 58 29 (203) 136 0.8 2.8 4.6 442 25.9 .. 1 ..Mali 3 37 25 (297) 121 2.5 2.1 3.0 354 14.5 3 33 ..Mauritania 4 2 40 (128) 245 .. 1.4 4.3 201 21.6 .. 2 ..Mozambique 6 245 12 (847) 204 2.5 2.8 2.9 907 24.8 .. 12 ..Namibia .. .. 47 c (328) c .. 3.3 3.7 8.1 170 4.9 .. 2 4Niger (1) 8 16 (149) 83 .. 1.2 2.7 f 230 11.7 .. 5 ..Nigeria 949 1,046 41 569 99 0.9 0.8 .. f 180 0.6 .. 48 1Rwanda 15 8 6 (321) 64 3.0 d .. .. 348 18.3 .. 2 ..Senegal 24 112 31 (340) 78 1.4 d 2.6 3.5 487 10.8 .. 27 ..Sierra Leone 10 2 15 (64) 186 1.4 0.9 1.0 121 18.9 .. 1 ..Somalia (26) 0 .. .. .. .. .. .. 100 .. .. .. ..South Africa .. 1,005 27 2,951 18 1.5 3.3 6.1 514 0.4 941 2,044 126Sudan 1 378 10 (668) 175 3.0 .. 3.7 226 2.5 .. 3 ..Tanzania, United Rep {t} 3 183 14 (1,001) 93 .. 1.3 2.1 1,012 11.7 .. 27 ..Togo 7 34 34 (184) 108 .. 1.3 4.5 90 6.7 .. 5 ..Uganda 1 217 11 (784) 54 1.8 1.9 1.6 686 10.7 .. 22 ..Zambia 153 187 27 (477) 197 0.6 d 3.6 2.3 589 20.4 2 1,179 2Zimbabwe (13) 194 41 (53) 70 4.8 .. 10.8 234 4.0 8 36 4NORTH AMERICA 64,718 292,463 13 c (189,082) c .. 3.0 5.8 5.1 .. .. 5,109 23,812 1,517Canada 6,559 36,830 43 c 13,418 c .. 1.2 o 6.5 5.6 .. .. 1,722 4,562 475United States 58,159 255,633 11 c (202,500) c .. 3.1 o 5.8 5.0 .. .. 3,387 19,103 1,042C. AMERICA & CARIBBEAN 3,563 17,503 32 (17,414) 39 0.5 2.7 .. 2,165 0.4 .. 10,245 194Belize 17 28 50 (86) 57 .. 2.3 .. 25 3.7 .. 4 ..Costa Rica 129 564 49 294 31 .. 5.2 6.1 11 0.1 .. 111 20Cuba .. .. 16 .. .. .. .. .. 61 .. .. .. ..Dominican Rep 116 997 30 (1,528) 29 .. 1.9 .. 126 0.8 .. 92 1El Salvador 11 507 26 (1,645) 32 0.7 2.6 .. 182 1.5 .. 225 u ..Guatemala 151 353 19 (1,533) 25 0.8 2.1 2.0 263 1.4 .. 287 r 2Haiti 9 18 12 (636) 30 .. 1.4 .. 293 7.4 .. 6 ..Honduras 48 206 44 (632) 108 .. 3.9 4.0 529 9.9 .. 30 2Jamaica 61 450 43 (765) 64 .. 3.1 6.3 2 0.0 .. 177 ..Mexico 2,755 12,171 31 (9,001) 37 0.5 2.6 .. 9 0.0 .. 8,420 l 159Nicaragua 0 246 37 (1,052) 358 1.1 8.5 4.2 f 606 31.0 .. 21 ..Panama 39 850 33 (736) 77 .. 4.9 .. 18 0.2 .. 279 ..Trinidad and Tobago 107 671 55 339 39 .. 2.5 .. 13 0.2 .. 65 1SOUTH AMERICA 4,612 61,310 13 (14,862) 42 1.5 2.8 .. 2,124 0.2 2,019 16,345 521Argentina 1,337 14,314 10 (4,689) 51 1.3 s 2.2 .. 87 0.0 .. 635 114Bolivia (3) 902 18 (846) 70 1.5 4.1 .. 558 6.9 .. 257 1Brazil 1,742 31,089 10 (11,341) 36 1.3 2.9 4.6 281 0.0 1,225 8,050 330Chile 673 5,845 29 (349) 48 3.3 2.7 3.7 75 0.1 478 3,173 11Colombia 426 2,224 19 (1,558) 38 2.3 5.2 .. 219 0.3 302 2,220 21Ecuador 95 738 35 798 89 .. 1.7 .. 158 1.0 .. 121 1Guyana 0 54 97 (82) 228 .. 4.5 .. 94 14.4 4 59 ..Paraguay 32 170 24 (1,218) 36 1.0 1.7 4.5 79 1.0 .. 109 1Peru 42 1,658 15 (1,749) 54 .. 2.4 3.2 453 0.9 10 1,183 13Suriname .. .. 18 8 .. .. .. .. 43 4.8 .. 9 ..Uruguay 16 232 19 (233) 38 1.1 1.9 2.6 22 0.1 .. 123 22Venezuela 251 4,083 24 6,398 42 1.2 2.6 .. 54 0.1 .. 406 7OCEANIA 9,511 9,932 21 c (11,000) c .. 1.6 6.0 5.1 .. .. 610 3,209 1,112Australia 7,582 7,758 19 c (9,486) c .. 1.7 6.0 4.8 .. .. 610 2,539 1,049Fiji 44 25 68 66 10 .. 2.9 .. 34 2.2 .. 151 ..New Zealand 1,693 1,937 31 c (52) c .. 1.0 6.3 7.2 f .. .. .. 81 63Papua New Guinea 171 179 48 c 143 c 69 0.8 2.5 .. 284 7.9 .. 345 ..Solomon Islands 8 10 .. .. 50 .. .. .. 50 16.5 .. 56 ..DEVELOPED 154,292 762,210 21 c 2,829 c .. 2.1 6.1 4.8 .. .. 49,806 340,116 19,297DEVELOPING 25,534 154,670 34 74,191 37 2.4 2.3 .. 34,450 0.6 11,852 478,172 3,179a. Data are averaged over a range of three years. b. Data are from a single year within the indicated range of years. c. Data are from 1998 and 1999 only. d. Military expenditures are underreported for these countries. e. Economic data for Indonesia include East Timor. f. Partial estimate of education expenditure. g. Data are from 1998 only. h. Data are from 1999 and 2000 only. i. National accounts data exclude overseas territories. j. Data are from 1991. k. National accounts data exclude Transnistria.l. Data are from 1993. m. Debt of the former Soviet Union is included as a liabiliy of the Russian Federation. n. Data are from 2000 only. o. Figures are for the fiscal year rather than the calendar year. p. Military expenditures are overreported for these countries. q. Economic data for Jordan refer to the East Bank only. r. Data are from 1985. s. Military expenditure data are highly uncertain. t. Economic data cover mainland Tanzania only. u. Data are from 1990.

2000

Net Inflows(million

current $US) {a}Percent of GDP

Foreign Direct

Military

1994-2000 {b}

Number of Transnational

Off'l. Development

Receipts1998-2000 {a}

CorporationsExpenditure as aGovernmentInvestment, Assistance (ODA)

Certification(number)

2000

Corpor-ations

With ISO14000

243P a r t I I : D a t a T a b l e s

Data Table 3 continuedMore data tables are available. Log on to http://earthtrends.wri.org/datatables/governance or send an e-mail [emailprotected] with “Instructions” in the message body.

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (17)

VARIABLE DEFINITIONS AND METHODOLOGYForeign Direct Investment (FDI) is the net inflow of invest-ment to acquire a lasting management interest (10 percent ormore of voting stock) in an enterprise operating in an economyother than that of the investor. It is the sum in million currentU.S. dollars of equity capital, reinvestment of earnings, otherlong-term capital, and short-term capital, as shown in the bal-ance of payments. FDI can show foreign perceptions of invest-ment opportunities in a given country. Data are based on bal-ance of payments information reported by the InternationalMonetary Fund (IMF), supplemented by data from the OECDand official national sources.

Exports of Goods and Services as a Percent of GDP repre-sents the value of all goods and other market services providedto the rest of the world as a proportion of Gross DomesticProduct (GDP). Exports include the value of merchandise,freight, insurance, transport, travel, royalties, license fees, andother services, such as communication, construction, financial,information, business, personal, and government services. Theyexclude labor and property income (formerly called factor serv-ices) as well as transfer payments. These data show, amongother things, the level to which a country’s economy is suscep-tible to world price fluctuations.

Balance of Trade is the net exports (exports minus imports) inmillion current U.S. dollars of goods and services for a particu-lar country. It includes all transactions between residents of acountry and the rest of the world involving a change in owner-ship of goods and services. If a country’s exports exceed itsimports, it has a trade surplus—a “positive” trade balance. Ifimports exceed exports, the country has a trade deficit—a“negative” trade balance. A change in the trade balance mayindicate a change in a country’s economic health or in the rela-tive cost of domestic products when compared with interna-tional prices. Data are based on International Monetary Fund(IMF) databases, supplemented with estimates by World Bankstaff. More information can be found in the IMF’s Balance ofPayments Manual 1993 (available on-line at http://www.imf.org/external/np/sta/bop/BOPman.pdf). Sources includecustoms data, monetary accounts of the banking system, exter-nal debt records, information provided by enterprises, surveysto estimate services transactions, and foreign exchangerecords.

External Debt as a Percent of GNI is the total debt owed tononresidents repayable in foreign currency, goods, or servicesas a percentage of gross national income (GNI). It is the sum ofpublic, publicly guaranteed, and private nonguaranteed long-term debt, use of International Monetary Fund (IMF) credit, andshort-term debt. GNI is the sum of value added by all residentproducers plus any product taxes not included in the valuationof output plus net receipts of primary income from abroad. Dataare gathered by the World Bank using loan-by-loan reports onlong-term public and publicly guaranteed borrowing, along withinformation on short-term debt collected by the countries, orfrom creditors through the reporting systems of the Bank forInternational Settlements and the OECD. These data are sup-plemented by information on loans and credits from majormultilateral banks, loan statements from official lending agen-cies in major creditor countries, and estimates from WorldBank and IMF staff.

Military Expenditure as a percent of GDP is defined by theStockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) as“all current and capital expenditure on: (a) the armed forces,including peacekeeping forces; (b) defense ministries andother government agencies engaged in defense; (c) paramili-tary forces associated with military operations; and (d) mili-tary space activities” as a proportion of gross domestic prod-

uct. Expenditures include the cost of procurements, person-nel, research & development, construction, operations, main-tenance, and military aid to other countries. Civil defense,veteran’s benefits, demobilization and destruction ofweapons are not included as military expenditures. SIPRIobtains military expenditure data from primary sources, sec-ondary sources quoting primary data, and other sources,including specialist journals and newspapers. When a coun-try’s definition of military expenditure differs from SIPRI’s,estimates are made based on analysis of official governmentbudget statistics.

Public Health Expenditure as a percent of GDP is the pro-portion of the gross domestic product (GDP) used for recurrentand capital spending from government budgets and socialhealth insurance funds. Health expenditures include preventa-tive and curative health services, family planning activities,nutrition activities, and emergency aid designated for health.Provision of water and sanitation are not included. Healthexpenditure estimates are those provided to the World Bankfrom the World Health Organization’s World Health Report in2000 and 2001. These data are supplemented with informationfrom The European Observatory on Health Care Systems, OECD,and World Bank country and sector studies.

Public Education Expenditure as a percent of GDP is theproportion of gross domestic product (GDP) used for publicspending on public education plus subsidies to private educa-tion at the primary, secondary, and tertiary levels. Foreign aidfor education is excluded; spending for religious schools, whichconstitutes a sizable portion of educational spending in somedeveloping countries, may also be excluded. According to theWorld Bank, education expenditure as a share of GDP reflectsa country’s “effort in education.” Education expenditure esti-mates are provided to the World Bank by the United NationsEducational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)Institute for Statistics. UNESCO compiles their data fromannual financial reports of central governments and state,provincial, or regional administrations.

Official Development Assistance (ODA) records the actualreceipts of financial resources or of goods or services valued atthe cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal dur-ing the same period. Data are reported in million current USdollars. Grants by official agencies of the members of theDevelopment Assistance Committee (DAC) are included, asare loans with a grant element of at least 25 percent, and tech-nical cooperation and assistance. The data on developmentassistance are compiled by the DAC and published in itsannual statistical report, Geographical Distribution of FinancialFlows to Aid Recipients, and the DAC annual Development Co-operation Report. Official Development Assistance as apercent of GNI is calculated as a proportion of gross nationalincome (GNI, formerly GNP), and can be used to measure thelevel of importance of foreign aid to a country’s economy.

A Parent Corporation is the portion of a transnational corpo-ration (TNC) that controls assets of other entities outside ofits home country. Typically, “control” is defined as an ownershipof more than 10 percent of a corporation’s equities or its equiv-alent for an unincorporated enterprise. A TNC is defined by theUnited Nations Conference on Trade and Development(UNCTAD) as an “incorporated or unincorporated enterprisecomposed of parent enterprises and their foreign affiliates.”Foreign Affiliates are corporations in which an investor resid-ing in another country has a lasting interest in the managementof the enterprise, typically owning more than 10 percent of acorporation’s equities or its equivalent for an unincorporatedenterprise. UNCTAD requests data from national governmentsand publishes data precisely as reported.

244W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 2 – 2 0 0 4

Data Table 3 continued

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (18)

Corporations with ISO 14000 Certification is defined as thenumber of companies in each country that have received ISO14000 certification by December of any given year. Nationalstandards institutes from individual countries have created theISO 14000, which provides voluntary environmental manage-ment systems standards. Companies adhering to the ISO 14000implement environmental management systems, conduct envi-ronmental audits, and evaluate their environmental perform-ance. Their products adhere to environmental labeling stan-dards, and waste streams are managed through life cycleassessments. The International Organization for Standardiza-tion compiles data on all countries through an annual survey.

FREQUENCY OF UPDATE BY DATA PROVIDERS All data sets are updated annually, with the exception of thedata on transnational corporations and education expenditure.These are updated intermittently. Most data updates includerevisions of past data.

DATA RELIABILITY AND CAUTIONARY NOTES Foreign Direct Investment. Because of the multiplicity ofsources, definitions, and reporting methods, data may not becomparable across countries. Data do not include capitalraised locally, which has become an important source of financ-ing in some developing countries. In addition, data only capturecross-border investment flows when equity participation isinvolved and thus omit nonequity cross-border transactions.Exports as a percent of GDP. Data on exports are compiledfrom customs reports and balance of payments data. Althoughthe data on exports and imports from the payments side pro-vide reasonably reliable records of cross-border transactions,they may not adhere strictly to appropriate definitions of valua-tion and timing, or correspond with the change-of-ownershipcriterion. Neither customs nor balance of payments data usu-ally capture the illegal transactions that occur in many coun-tries. Goods carried by travelers across borders in legal butunreported shuttle trade may further distort trade statistics.

Balance of Trade. Because of the variety of sources, data maybe inconsistent. Differences in collection methods—such astiming, definitions of residences and ownership, and exchangerate valuations—contribute to net errors and omissions. Inaddition, smuggling and other illegal or quasi-legal trans-actions may be unrecorded or misreported.

External Debt as a percent of GNI. Variations in reportingrescheduled debt affect cross-country comparability. Otherareas of inconsistency include country treatment of arrears andof nonresident national deposits denominated in foreign cur-rency. With the widening spectrum of debt instruments andinvestors and the expansion of private nonguaranteed borrow-ing, data are increasingly difficult to measure. Military debt isoften underreported.

Military Expenditure as a percent of GDP. Many values areuncertain or estimated. SIPRI cautions that military expendi-ture does not relate directly to military capability or security.

Public Health Expenditure as a percent of GDP. Data onpublic spending at the sub-national level are not aggregated inall countries, making total health expenditure difficult to meas-ure. Few developing countries have health accounts that aremethodologically consistent with national accounting proce-dures. Health care systems are not always defined clearly.

WHO cautions that these data should only be used for an“order of magnitude” estimate; cross-country comparisonsshould be avoided.

Education Expenditure as a percent of GDP. In some cases,data refer only to the Ministry of Education’s expenditures,excluding other authorities that spend money on educationalactivities. The World Bank cautions that these data do notmeasure effectiveness or levels of attainment in a particulareducational system.

Official Development Assistance. Because data are basedon donor country reports, they do not provide a complete pic-ture of the resources received by developing and transitioneconomies for three reasons. First, flows from DAC membersare only part of the aggregate resource flows to theseeconomies. Second, the data that record contributions to multi-lateral institutions measure the flow of resources made avail-able to those institutions by DAC members, not the flow ofresources from those institutions to developing and transitioneconomies. Third, because some of the countries and territorieson the DAC recipient list are normally classified as high-income, the reported flows may overstate the resources avail-able to low- and middle-income economies.

Parent Corporations and Foreign Affiliates. Regional andglobal totals represent a sum of available data and may there-fore be incomplete. Some countries count the number offoreign-sponsored projects instead of the number of actualcompanies; in this case, some double counting has occurred.Because of the range of survey years and the acceptance ofsurvey data “as-is” from national governments, cross-countrycomparisons should be made with caution.

ISO 14000 Certification. A small amount of double countingoccurs due to joint assessments of a single company. In addi-tion, some underreporting may occur in all countries. No dis-tinction is made between accredited and non-accredited insti-tutions, and certifications may be for a single site or formultiple sites. Survey data are only as reliable as the reports ofeach national institute, and ISO does not ensure the accuracyof this data. The ISO 14000 standards have been criticizedbecause they do not require companies to provide publicreports on their environmental performance.

SOURCES Foreign Direct Investment, Exports as a percent of GDP,Balance of Trade, External Debt, Public Health and Edu-cation Expenditure, and Official Development Assistancedata: Development Data Group, The World Bank. 2002. WorldDevelopment Indicators 2002 online. Washington, D.C.: TheWorld Bank. Available on-line at http://www.worldbank.org/data. Military Expenditure as a Percent of GDP: StockholmInternational Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). 2002. The SIPRIMilitary Expenditure Database (available on-line http://projects.sipri.se/milex/mex_database1.html). Stockholm:SIPRI. Transnational Corporations: United Nations Confer-ence on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). 2001. World Invest-ment Report 2001: Promoting Linkages, pp. 239–243. New Yorkand Geneva: UNCTAD. Available on-line at www.unctad.org/wir/index.htm. ISO Certification: International Organi-zation for Standardization (ISO). 2001. The ISO Survey of ISO9000 and ISO 14000 Certificates. Available on-line at http://www.iso.ch/iso/en/iso9000-14000/pdf/survey10thcycle.pdf.Geneva: ISO.

245P a r t I I : D a t a T a b l e s

Data Table 3 continued

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (19)

Data Table 4 Economic IndicatorsSources: World Bank, United Nations Population Division

GDPper Capita Gini

Total Average Total Average PPP Index {b} Net AdjustedValue Annual Growth Value Annual (current Agri- Ind- Ser- (0= Sur- National Net

(millions) Rate (percent) (dollars) Growth Rate int'l $) culture ustry vices perfect Poorest Richest vey $1/ $2/ Savings Savings2000 1991-2000 2000 1991-2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 equality) 20% 20% year Day Day 2000 2000

WORLD 34,109,900 2.8 5,632 1.4 7,416 5 31 64 c .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 10.2 12.0 ASIA (EXCL. MIDDLE EAST) 8,913,075 2.8 2,670 1.4 4,327 6 35 59 c .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 16.9 18.9 Armenia 3,711 0.7 980 0.1 2,570 25 36 39 '96 d 44.4 5.5 50.6 '96 8 34 (5.7) (5.0) Azerbaijan 4,071 (4.6) 506 (5.7) 2,939 19 38 43 '95 e 36.0 6.9 43.3 '95 2 10 9.5 ..Bangladesh 48,906 4.9 356 2.6 1,527 25 24 51 '96 d 33.6 8.7 42.8 '96 29 78 17.2 16.3 Bhutan 428 6.8 205 4.5 545 33 37 29 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 14.2 16.7 Cambodia 3,565 4.6 272 1.4 1,326 f 37 20 42 '97 d 40.4 6.9 47.6 .. .. .. 10.0 11.3 China 1,040,312 10.1 816 9.0 3,936 16 51 33 '98 e 40.3 5.9 46.6 '99 19 53 30.6 26.8 Georgia 2,505 (9.9) 476 (9.6) 2,544 32 13 55 '96 e 37.1 6.1 43.6 '96 2 2 (7.0) (6.1) India 466,682 6.3 463 4.4 2,374 25 27 48 '97 d 37.8 8.1 46.1 '97 44 86 13.9 12.2 Indonesia 209,098 3.5 986 2.0 3,019 17 47 36 '99 d 31.7 9.0 41.1 '99 8 55 15.9 2.9 Japan 5,687,635 1.3 44,751 1.0 26,707 1 32 66 c '93 e 24.9 10.6 35.7 .. .. .. 13.5 18.0 Kazakhstan 22,487 (3.3) 1,390 (2.9) 5,398 9 43 48 '96 d 35.4 6.7 42.3 '96 2 15 11.5 (29.6) Korea, Dem People's Rep .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Korea, Rep 617,513 5.5 13,212 4.6 17,579 5 43 53 '93 d 31.6 7.5 39.3 '93 2 2 19.2 21.9 Kyrgyzstan 4,350 (2.8) 884 (3.9) 2,708 39 26 34 '99 d 34.6 7.6 42.5 .. .. .. (3.2) (2.9) Lao People's Dem Rep 2,376 6.6 450 4.0 1,576 f 53 23 24 '97 d 37.0 7.6 45.0 '97 26 73 8.5 10.1 Malaysia 111,617 6.6 5,024 4.3 9,497 11 45 44 '97 e 49.2 4.4 54.3 .. .. .. 30.4 22.5 Mongolia 1,027 2.1 405 0.9 1,688 33 19 48 '95 d 33.2 7.3 40.9 '95 14 50 11.5 ..Myanmar .. .. .. .. .. 60 9 31 c .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Nepal 5,560 4.8 241 2.4 1,327 40 22 37 '96 d 36.7 7.6 44.8 '95 38 83 19.7 16.6 Pakistan 71,278 3.5 505 0.9 1,884 26 23 51 '97 d 31.2 9.5 41.1 '96 31 85 4.7 1.9 Philippines 88,232 3.6 1,166 1.4 3,967 16 31 53 '97 d 46.2 5.4 52.3 .. .. .. 20.8 22.2 Singapore 113,426 7.7 28,229 4.5 23,356 0 34 66 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 38.2 39.9 Sri Lanka 16,658 5.3 880 4.2 3,611 20 27 53 '95 d 34.4 8.0 42.8 '95 7 45 16.5 18.0 Tajikistan 2,381 (9.2) 391 (10.4) 1,167 19 26 55 '98 d 34.7 8.0 40.0 .. .. .. 7.8 5.2 Thailand 170,338 3.5 2,712 2.1 6,190 10 40 49 '98 d 41.4 6.4 48.4 '98 2 28 15.4 16.2 Turkmenistan 7,157 (4.3) 1,511 (6.7) 4,342 27 50 23 '98 d 40.8 6.1 47.5 '98 12 44 19.6 ..Uzbekistan 12,007 0.1 483 (1.8) 2,429 35 23 42 '98 d 44.7 4.0 49.1 '93 3 27 5.9 ..Viet Nam 27,934 7.9 357 6.1 2,006 24 37 39 '98 d 36.1 8.0 44.5 .. .. .. 21.4 13.6 EUROPE 11,139,956 1.8 15,327 1.5 16,525 3 30 68 c .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 8.6 11.5 Albania 3,068 5.3 979 6.0 3,816 51 26 23 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 4.7 5.9 Austria 265,716 2.1 32,886 1.7 26,866 2 33 65 c '95 e 31.0 6.9 38.0 .. .. .. 9.8 14.5 Belarus 27,618 (0.8) 2,711 (0.7) 7,409 15 37 47 '98 d 21.7 11.4 33.3 '98 2 2 13.5 16.4 Belgium 316,070 2.2 30,838 1.9 27,185 2 27 72 '96 e 28.7 8.3 37.3 .. .. .. 9.4 12.2 Bosnia and Herzegovina 6,068 27.3 g 1,526 24.3 g .. 12 26 62 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Bulgaria 12,277 (1.6) 1,544 (0.7) 5,866 15 28 58 '97 e 26.4 10.1 36.8 '97 2 22 1.1 0.5 Croatia 22,538 2.5 4,843 2.2 7,615 10 33 58 '98 e 29.0 8.8 38.0 '98 2 2 8.4 ..Czech Rep 54,561 1.6 5,312 1.6 13,993 4 41 55 '96 e 25.4 10.3 35.9 '96 2 2 14.1 17.0 Denmark 205,551 2.7 38,637 2.3 27,710 3 26 71 '92 e 24.7 9.6 34.5 .. .. .. 9.2 16.4 Estonia 6,066 1.1 4,354 2.4 9,889 6 27 67 '98 e 37.6 7.0 45.1 '98 2 5 3.1 6.2 Finland 165,787 3.6 32,056 3.3 25,021 4 34 62 '91 e 25.6 10.0 35.8 .. .. .. 11.7 18.4 France 1,755,614 h 1.8 h 29,637 h 1.4 h 24,082 3 26 71 '95 e 32.7 7.2 40.2 .. .. .. 9.0 14.3 Germany 2,680,002 1.5 32,676 1.2 25,144 1 31 68 '94 e 30.0 8.2 38.5 .. .. .. 6.2 10.2 Greece 138,386 2.2 13,043 1.8 16,423 8 24 69 c '93 e 32.7 7.5 40.3 .. .. .. 7.8 9.4 Hungary 54,371 2.5 5,455 2.9 12,484 6 34 .. i '98 d 24.4 10.0 34.4 '98 2 7 13.3 16.3 Iceland 8,796 3.2 31,496 2.2 29,762 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Ireland 105,248 8.0 27,674 7.0 29,795 4 36 60 c '87 e 35.9 6.7 42.9 .. .. .. 18.5 23.5 Italy 1,204,868 1.7 20,943 1.5 23,692 3 30 68 '95 e 27.3 8.7 36.3 .. .. .. 7.0 11.2 Latvia 6,160 (1.3) 2,545 (0.2) 6,904 4 25 70 '98 e 32.4 7.6 40.3 '98 2 8 9.5 15.0 Lithuania 7,597 (1.7) 2,055 (1.5) 7,104 8 33 59 '96 d 32.4 7.8 40.3 '96 2 8 4.8 8.9 Macedonia, FYR 5,138 (0.1) 2,526 (0.7) 5,078 12 33 55 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 3.8 ..Moldova, Rep 2,722 j (8.3) 634 j (8.1) 2,103 28 20 52 '97 e 40.6 5.6 46.8 '97 11 38 4.9 9.0 Netherlands 492,956 2.9 31,074 2.3 25,746 3 27 70 c '94 e 32.6 7.3 40.1 .. .. .. 14.1 18.4 Norway 170,452 3.7 38,141 3.1 30,065 2 43 55 '95 e 25.8 9.7 35.8 .. .. .. 20.6 19.5 Poland 163,236 5.3 4,228 5.2 9,062 4 36 60 '98 d 31.6 7.8 39.7 '98 2 2 9.6 12.7 Portugal 128,039 2.8 12,784 2.7 17,277 4 31 66 '95 e 35.6 7.3 43.4 '94 2 2 2.9 8.1 Romania 32,748 0.1 1,460 0.4 6,422 13 36 51 '98 d 31.1 8.0 39.5 '94 3 28 5.3 2.8 Russian Federation 357,322 (4.1) 2,456 (3.8) 8,381 7 39 54 '98 d 48.7 4.4 53.7 '98 7 25 25.1 (13.4) Serbia and Montenegro 13,187 0.6 k 1,250 0.6 k .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 15.9 18.8 Slovakia 22,471 3.5 4,162 3.2 11,250 4 31 65 '92 e 19.5 11.9 31.4 '92 2 2 12.6 17.2 Slovenia 23,177 3.7 11,660 3.3 17,370 3 38 58 '98 e 28.4 9.1 37.7 '98 2 2 10.1 14.4 Spain 702,395 2.7 17,599 2.6 19,255 4 31 66 '90 e 32.5 7.5 40.3 .. .. .. 6.7 14.0 Sweden 276,768 2.3 31,301 2.0 24,351 2 29 69 i '92 e 25.0 9.6 34.5 .. .. .. 19.0 23.6 Switzerland 335,570 1.0 46,799 0.6 28,808 2 30 68 i '92 e 33.1 6.9 40.3 .. .. .. 4.7 (4.2) Ukraine 44,352 (8.8) 895 (8.3) 3,810 14 38 48 '99 d 29.0 8.8 37.8 '99 3 31 3.6 7.0 United Kingdom 1,294,359 2.8 21,785 2.5 23,637 1 29 70 '95 e 36.8 6.1 43.2 .. .. .. .. ..MIDDLE EAST & N. AFRICA 826,705 2.7 2,364 0.6 5,500 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 15.4 (1.7) Afghanistan .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Algeria 48,819 2.2 1,612 0.2 5,326 f 9 60 31 '95 d 35.3 7.0 42.6 '95 2 15 .. ..Egypt 78,422 4.8 1,155 2.9 3,426 17 34 49 '95 d 28.9 9.8 39.0 '95 3 53 13.2 11.3 Iran, Islamic Rep 104,986 3.2 1,493 1.4 5,326 19 22 59 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 24.9 (12.5) Iraq .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Israel 106,383 4.8 17,612 1.9 20,773 .. .. .. '97 e 38.1 6.1 44.2 .. .. .. 0.1 6.0 Jordan 7,899 l 4.6 l 1,608 l 0.6 l 3,945 2 25 73 '97 d 36.4 7.6 44.4 '97 2 7 11.4 15.8 Kuwait 26,880 3.2 m 14,041 3.5 m 16,377 f .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 36.1 (8.4) Lebanon 12,511 4.5 3,578 1.9 5,333 12 22 66 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. (10.8) (9.8) Libyan Arab Jamahiriya .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Morocco 39,324 2.4 1,316 0.4 3,407 14 32 54 '99 d 39.5 6.5 46.6 '90-91 2 8 14.0 17.6 Oman .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Saudi Arabia 139,438 1.1 6,853 (1.7) 11,578 7 48 45 i .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 21.3 (27.3) Syrian Arab Rep 13,578 5.4 839 2.7 3,556 24 30 46 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 10.3 (27.9) Tunisia 23,623 4.7 2,497 3.2 6,433 12 29 59 '95 d 41.7 5.7 47.9 '95 2 10 14.7 15.6 Turkey 204,651 3.7 3,070 2.0 6,830 16 25 59 '94 d 41.5 5.8 47.7 '94 2 18 13.2 15.3 United Arab Emirates .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Yemen 5,496 6.0 300 1.3 852 15 46 38 '98 d 33.4 7.4 41.2 '98 16 45 26.7 (18.2)

Total GDP (1995 US$) (1995 US$)

of IncomePercent Share

Savings Rate(percent of GNI)

veyyear

Sur-

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) InternationalIncome Inequality PovertyGDP per Capita Distribution

(percent) PercentUnder

Lineby Sector {a}

246W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 2 – 2 0 0 4

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (20)

Data Table 4 continuedMore data tables are available. Log on to http://earthtrends.wri.org/datatables/economics or send an e-mail [emailprotected] with “Instructions” in the message body.

GDPper Capita Gini

Total Average Total Average PPP Index {b} Net AdjustedValue Annual Growth Value Annual (current Agri- Ind- Ser- (0= Sur- National Net

(millions) Rate (percent) (dollars) Growth Rate int'l $) culture ustry vices perfect Poorest Richest vey $1/ $2/ Savings Savings2000 1991-2000 2000 1991-2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 equality) 20% 20% year Day Day 2000 2000

SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA 362,493 2.6 617 0.4 1,797 17 31 53 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 4.6 (1.1) Angola 6,647 2.3 506 (1.8) 2,187 f 6 76 18 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. (17.9) ..Benin 2,598 4.8 414 1.7 991 38 14 48 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 2.6 3.4 Botswana 6,330 4.7 4,107 2.4 7,467 4 44 52 .. .. .. .. '85-86 33 61 1.2 8.1 Burkina Faso 2,842 4.8 246 2.4 954 f 35 17 48 '98 d 55.1 4.6 60.4 '94 61 86 16.8 16.7 Burundi 958 (2.8) 151 (3.6) 633 f 51 18 31 '98 d 42.5 5.1 48.0 .. .. .. (5.5) (5.8) Cameroon 10,044 2.4 675 (0.8) 1,703 44 20 36 '96 d 47.7 4.6 53.1 '96 33 64 6.8 (0.5) Central African Rep 1,258 2.5 339 (0.3) 1,172 f 55 20 26 '93 d 61.3 2.0 65.0 '93 67 84 4.5 5.9 Chad 1,676 2.1 213 (0.8) 850 f 39 14 47 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. (2.6) (0.6) Congo 2,539 (0.6) 841 (3.4) 825 5 71 24 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 28.5 ..Congo, Dem Rep .. .. .. .. .. f .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. (11.3) (13.5) Côte d'Ivoire 11,890 3.9 743 1.0 1,630 29 22 48 '95 d 36.7 7.1 44.3 '95 12 49 (1.9) 0.8 Equatorial Guinea 731 24.8 1,600 18.9 15,083 7 88 5 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Eritrea 635 3.9 m 174 1.9 m 937 f 17 29 54 c .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Ethiopia 7,451 5.4 118 1.8 683 52 11 37 '95 d 40.0 7.1 47.7 '95 31 76 2.8 (7.3) Gabon 5,385 2.8 4,378 0.1 6,237 6 53 40 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 2.3 (37.6) Gambia 483 3.2 371 (0.3) 1,649 f 38 13 49 '98 d 50.2 4.0 55.3 '98 59 83 (1.6) 1.5 Ghana 7,978 4.2 413 1.8 1,964 f 35 25 39 '99 d 40.7 5.6 46.7 '99 45 79 6.1 5.3 Guinea 4,474 4.5 549 1.3 1,802 24 37 39 '94 d 40.3 6.4 47.2 .. .. .. 5.8 2.2 Guinea-Bissau 251 0.8 210 (1.2) 755 59 12 29 '91 d 56.2 2.1 58.9 .. .. .. .. ..Kenya 9,876 2.2 322 (0.6) 1,003 20 19 61 '97 d 44.9 5.6 51.2 '94 27 62 3.4 8.1 Lesotho 1,122 4.1 552 2.1 2,031 f 17 44 39 '87 d 56.0 2.8 60.1 '93 43 66 12.1 16.9 Liberia .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Madagascar 3,815 2.6 239 (0.9) 817 35 13 52 '99 d 38.1 6.4 44.9 '99 49 83 (0.4) 1.2 Malawi 1,739 3.9 154 2.0 560 42 19 39 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. (7.6) (8.1) Mali 3,119 4.0 275 1.2 761 46 17 37 '94 d 50.5 4.6 56.2 '94 73 91 3.6 5.7 Mauritania 1,321 4.3 496 1.2 1,677 22 31 47 '95 d 37.3 6.4 44.1 '95 29 69 22.7 3.7 Mozambique 3,380 7.0 185 3.2 826 f 24 25 50 '97 d 39.6 6.5 46.5 '96 38 78 2.5 5.9 Namibia 4,230 3.9 2,408 1.7 6,433 f 11 28 61 c .. .. .. .. '93 35 56 14.2 22.5 Niger 2,197 2.8 203 (1.0) 746 f 39 18 44 '95 d 50.5 2.6 53.3 '95 61 85 (5.6) (6.3) Nigeria 32,184 2.3 283 (0.4) 998 30 46 25 '97 d 50.6 4.4 55.7 '97 70 91 21.2 (31.8) Rwanda 2,057 0.9 270 (1.3) 1,055 44 21 35 '85 d 28.9 9.7 39.1 '83-85 36 85 6.9 6.0 Senegal 5,806 4.1 616 1.1 1,527 18 27 55 '95 d 41.3 6.4 48.2 '95 26 68 5.3 8.1 Sierra Leone 741 (4.2) 168 (4.9) 560 47 30 23 '89 d 62.9 1.1 63.4 '89 57 75 .. ..Somalia .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..South Africa 170,568 2.3 3,938 0.2 9,291 f 3 31 66 '94 d 59.3 2.9 64.8 '96 12 36 1.7 4.5 Sudan 9,922 8.4 319 5.7 1,797 37 18 45 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. (6.7) (6.2) Tanzania, United Rep 6,419 n 3.2 183 n (0.1) 501 45 16 39 '93 d 38.2 6.8 45.5 '93 20 60 6.9 10.1 Togo 1,479 2.9 327 (0.5) 1,442 38 22 40 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 2.6 5.2 Uganda 7,728 7.2 332 3.9 1,152 f 42 19 38 '96 d 37.4 7.1 44.9 .. .. .. 3.9 3.7 Zambia 3,959 0.6 380 (2.1) 755 27 24 49 '98 d 52.6 3.3 56.6 '98 64 87 .. ..Zimbabwe 7,838 2.7 621 0.4 2,635 18 25 57 '95 d 50.1 4.7 55.7 '90-91 36 64 .. ..NORTH AMERICA 9,701,656 3.7 30,898 2.3 33,341 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 6.5 9.6 Canada 693,149 3.2 22,537 1.8 27,834 .. .. .. '94 e 31.5 7.5 39.3 .. .. .. 12.3 13.7 United States 9,008,507 3.7 31,806 2.4 33,939 .. .. .. '97 e 40.8 5.2 46.4 .. .. .. 6.1 9.3 C. AMERICA & CARIBBEAN 475,273 2.0 3,035 0.5 7,226 6 28 66 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 9.8 8.2 Belize 754 3.9 3,330 2.0 5,945 21 27 52 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 10.9 15.3 Costa Rica 14,908 5.3 3,705 2.4 8,193 9 31 59 '97 e 45.9 4.5 51.0 '98 13 26 7.2 11.6 Cuba .. .. .. .. .. 7 46 47 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Dominican Rep 17,264 6.4 2,062 4.2 6,033 11 34 55 '98 e 47.4 5.1 53.3 '96 3 16 14.2 14.9 El Salvador 10,995 4.6 1,751 2.6 4,496 10 30 60 '98 e 52.2 3.3 56.4 '98 21 45 3.8 5.0 Guatemala 17,742 4.1 1,558 1.4 3,821 23 20 57 '98 e 55.8 3.8 60.6 '98 10 34 2.4 1.6 Haiti 2,923 (0.2) 359 (2.2) 1,434 f 28 20 51 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 0.1 (1.1) Honduras 4,563 3.0 711 0.4 2,454 18 32 51 '98 e 56.3 2.2 59.4 '98 24 45 25.8 28.6 Jamaica 4,701 0.0 1,825 (0.4) 3,720 6 31 62 '00 d 37.9 6.7 46.0 '96 3 25 11.4 15.5 Mexico 374,141 3.1 3,784 1.3 8,941 4 28 67 '98 e 53.1 3.5 57.4 '98 16 38 10.1 8.1 Nicaragua 2,361 3.9 466 0.6 2,366 f 32 23 45 '98 d 60.3 2.3 63.6 .. .. .. 4.7 5.9 Panama 9,365 3.6 3,279 2.3 6,001 7 17 76 '97 d 48.5 3.6 52.8 '98 14 29 14.2 18.5 Trinidad and Tobago 6,665 3.3 5,149 2.4 9,010 2 43 55 '92 e 40.3 5.5 45.9 '92 12 39 6.1 (24.3) SOUTH AMERICA 1,457,476 3.2 4,218 1.7 7,374 8 29 63 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 6.0 3.8 Argentina 293,770 3.6 7,933 3.0 12,377 5 28 68 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1.1 1.7 Bolivia 7,926 4.0 952 1.6 2,424 22 15 63 '99 d 44.7 4.0 49.1 '99 14 34 3.5 2.9 Brazil 788,025 3.0 4,624 1.5 7,625 7 29 64 '98 e 60.7 2.2 64.1 '98 12 27 4.7 6.3 Chile 81,445 6.4 5,354 5.2 9,417 11 34 56 '98 e 56.7 3.3 61.0 '98 2 9 12.7 8.9 Colombia 96,864 2.8 2,301 1.1 6,276 14 31 56 '96 e 57.1 3.0 60.9 '98 20 36 2.7 (3.8) Ecuador 18,021 1.5 1,425 (0.3) 3,203 10 40 50 '95 d 43.7 5.4 49.7 '95 20 52 22.1 (5.5) Guyana 716 5.1 942 5.0 3,965 35 28 36 '93 d 40.2 6.3 46.9 .. .. .. .. ..Paraguay 9,344 2.1 1,700 (0.4) 4,426 f 21 27 52 c '98 e 57.7 1.9 60.7 '98 20 49 0.2 3.3 Peru 60,774 4.8 2,368 2.9 4,799 8 27 65 '96 e 46.2 4.4 51.2 '96 16 41 7.4 7.0 Suriname 414 3.5 993 2.9 3,797 f 10 20 70 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. (7.8) (5.4) Uruguay 20,405 3.2 6,115 2.6 9,035 6 27 67 '89 e 42.3 5.4 48.3 '89 2 7 (0.3) 2.3 Venezuela 79,772 1.1 3,300 (0.6) 5,794 5 36 59 '98 e 49.5 3.0 53.2 98 23 7 21.8 (0.7) OCEANIA 540,969 4.0 17,934 2.3 20,057 4 26 70 c .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 3.3 5.2 Australia 457,255 4.3 23,893 2.8 25,753 3 26 71 c '94 e 35.2 5.9 41.3 .. .. .. 2.7 4.3 Fiji 1,944 1.5 2,390 0.4 4,658 18 29 53 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 7.4 11.7 New Zealand 67,222 3.1 17,793 1.8 20,350 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 7.5 12.2 Papua New Guinea 4,756 3.0 989 1.5 2,432 f 26 44 30 '96 d 50.9 4.5 56.5 .. .. .. 8.6 ..Solomon Islands 287 1.9 642 (1.1) 1,646 f .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..LOW INCOME {o} 1,146,787 2.6 417 1.8 1,898 24 32 44 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 11.9 4.7 MIDDLE INCOME {o} 5,844,681 3.7 1,829 1.9 5,224 9 36 55 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 14.9 9.1 HIGH INCOME {o} 27,116,800 3.5 29,575 2.4 27,119 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 9.2 12.8

be 100. c. Distribution of GDP by sector data are from 1999. d. Ranked by per capita expenditure. e. Ranked by per capita income. f. Estimates are based on regression. g. Data refer to the growth rate from 1994-2000. h. National accounts data include French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, and Réunion. i. Data on distribution of GDP by sector are from 1998. j. National accounts data exclude Transnistria. k. Data refer to the growth rate from 1995-2000. l. Data refer to the East Bank only. m. Data refer to the growth rate from 1992-2000. n. Economic data cover mainland Tanzania only. o. Data for high, middle, and low-income countries are as reported by World Bank, except for per capita and growth rate calculations which are done by WRI.

a. Data may not sum to 100 percent due to rounding. b. If every person in a country earned the same income, the Gini Index would be zero; if all income was earned by one person, the Gini Index would

Sur-

Distribution

of Income

GDP per CapitaTotal GDP (1995 US$)

year

Savings Rate(percent of GNI)

veyUnder

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) InternationalIncome Inequality Poverty

(1995 US$) by Sector {a} Line(percent) Percent Share Percent

247P a r t I I : D a t a T a b l e s

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (21)

VARIABLE DEFINITIONS AND METHODOLOGYGross Domestic Product (GDP), Constant 1995 Dollars isthe sum of gross value added by all resident and nonresidentproducers in the economy plus any taxes and minus any subsi-dies not included in the value of the products. Data areexpressed in millions of U.S. dollars. The gross domestic prod-uct estimates at purchaser values (market prices) are the sumof GDP at purchaser values (value added in the agriculture,industry, and services sectors) and indirect taxes, less subsi-dies. It is calculated without making deductions for deprecia-tion of fabricated assets or for depletion and degradation ofnatural resources. National accounts indicators for most devel-oping countries are collected from national statistical organi-zations and central banks by visiting and resident World Bankmissions. The data for high-income economies come fromOECD data files (see the OECD’s National Accounts, 1988–1999,volumes 1 and 2). The United Nations Statistics Division pub-lishes detailed national accounts for United Nations membercountries in National Accounts Statistics: Main Aggregates andDetailed Tables and updates in the Monthly Bulletin of Statistics.To obtain comparable series of constant price data, the WorldBank rescales GDP and value added by industrial origin to acommon reference year, currently 1995. WRI calculates GDPper Capita by dividing World Bank GDP figures by the popula-tion estimates of the United Nations Population Division.

Average Annual Growth Rate is a calculation of the averagepercent growth between (and including) 1991 and 2000, usingleast-squares growth rate calculation. Growth rates are calcu-lated by WRI using a least-squares regression. The leastsquares growth rate is estimated by fitting a linear regressiontrend line to the logarithmic annual values of the variable in therelevant period. The calculated growth rate is an average ratethat is representative of the available observations over theentire period. It does not necessarily match the actual growthrate between any two periods.

Purchasing Power Parity, per capita is gross domestic prod-uct, per person, converted to international dollars using Pur-chasing Power Parity (PPP) rates. An international dollar hasthe same purchasing power in a given country as a UnitedStates dollar in the United States. In other words, it buys anequivalent amount of goods or services in that country. Theestimates are a blend of extrapolated and regression-basednumbers, using the results of the International ComparisonProgramme (ICP). The ICP benchmark studies are essentiallymultilateral pricing exercises. For 62 countries data come fromthe most recent round of surveys (1996); the rest are from the1993 round and have been extrapolated to the 1996 benchmark.Estimates from countries not included in the surveys arederived from statistical models. PPP studies recast traditionalnational accounts through special price collections and the dis-aggregation of GDP by expenditure components. National sta-tistical offices report ICP details. The international dollar val-ues, which are different from the U.S. dollar values of GDP, areobtained using special conversion factors designed to equalizethe purchasing powers of different currencies. This conversionfactor, the PPP, is defined as the number of units of a country’scurrency required to buy the same amounts of goods and serv-ices in the domestic market as $1 would buy in the UnitedStates. PPP estimates tend to lower per capita GDPs in indus-trialized countries and raise per capita GDPs in developingcountries. Data are expressed in current international dollars.

Distribution by Sector is the percent of total output of goodsand services which are a result of value added by a given sec-tor. These goods and services are for final use occurring withinthe domestic territory of a given country, regardless of the allo-cation to domestic and foreign claims. Value added is the netoutput of a sector after adding up all outputs and subtracting

intermediate inputs. It is calculated without making deductionsfor depreciation of fabricated assets or depletion and degrada-tion of natural resources. The industrial origin of value added isdetermined by the International Standard Industrial Classifica-tion (ISIC) revision 3.

Agriculture corresponds to ISIC divisions 1–5 and includesforestry and fishing. Industry corresponds to ISIC divisions10–45 and includes manufacturing (ISIC divisions 15–37). Itcomprises value added in mining, manufacturing, construction,electricity, water, and gas. Services correspond to ISIC divi-sions 50–99 and they include value added in wholesale andretail trade (including hotels and restaurants), transport, andgovernment, financial, professional, and personal services suchas education, health care, and real estate services. Alsoincluded are imputed bank service charges, import duties, andany statistical discrepancies noted by national compilers aswell as discrepancies arising from rescaling.

Income Inequality data is taken from household surveys col-lected by World Bank regional offices or government agencies.It is based on either income or expenditure. Data are compliedby the World Bank’s Development Research Group using pri-mary household survey data obtained from government statisti-cal agencies and World Bank country departments. The Giniindex and income distribution for high income countries arecalculated directly from the Luxemburg Income Study data-base, using an estimation method consistent with that appliedfor developing countries. Data are collected through nationallyrepresentative household surveys administered between 1985and 2000. They are based either on expenditure or per capitaincome, depending on the survey. Each distribution is based onpercentiles of population—rather than of households—withhouseholds ranked by income or expenditure per person.Survey Year is the year in which the survey that collected thedata was administered.

The Gini Index is a measure of income inequality. A score ofzero implies perfect equality while a score of 100 implies per-fect inequality. If every person in a country earned the sameincome, the Gini Index would be zero; if all income was earnedby one person, the Gini Index would be 100. The Gini index iscalculated by compiling income distribution (or expenditure)data to attain a single number which indicates the extent ofincome inequality within a country. A Lorenz curve plots thecumulative percentages of total income received against thecumulative number of recipients, starting with the poorest indi-vidual or household. Graphically, this displays the amount ofwealth that segment of the population earns. The Gini indexmeasures the area between the Lorenz curve and a hypothetical(45-degree) line of absolute equality, expressed as a percentageof the maximum area under the line.

Percent Share of Income is equal to the percentage share ofall income in a given country which is earned by a given fifth ofthe population. Where the original data from household surveyswere available, they have been used to directly calculate theincome (or consumption) share by quintile. Otherwise, shareshave been estimated from the best available grouped data. Thedistribution indicators have been adjusted for household size,providing a more consistent measure of per capita income orconsumption.

International Poverty Line data are based on nationally rep-resentative primary household surveys conducted by nationalstatistical offices or by private agencies under the supervisionof government or international agencies and obtained from gov-ernment statistical offices and World Bank country depart-ments. Population Living Below $1/day is the percent of thepopulation of a country living on less than $1.08 a day at 1993

248W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 2 – 2 0 0 4

Data Table 4 continued

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (22)

international prices, (equivalent to $1 in 1985 prices, adjustedfor purchasing power parity). Population Living Below$2/day is the percent of the population of a country living onless than $2.15 a day at 1993 international prices, (equivalent to$2 in 1985 prices, adjusted for purchasing power parity). Thesepoverty measures are based on surveys conducted mostlybetween 1994 and 1999, by the World Bank’s DevelopmentResearch Group. The commonly used $1 a day (or $2/day) stan-dard, measured in 1985 international prices and adjusted tolocal currency using purchasing power parities (PPPs) is usedbecause it is typical of the poverty lines in low-income coun-tries. PPP exchange rates, such as those from the Penn WorldTables or the World Bank, are used because they take intoaccount the local prices and goods and services not tradedinternationally. These data are based on surveys which wereadministered to households in each individual country. Surveysasked households to report either their consumption or theirincome. Whenever possible, consumption has been used as thewelfare indicator for deciding who is poor. When only house-hold income was available, average income has been adjustedto accord with either a survey-based estimate of mean con-sumption (when available) or an estimate based on consump-tion data from national accounts.

Net National Savings as a Percent of GNI: Net nationalsavings are equal to gross national savings (gross domesticproduct minus final consumption plus net income and net cur-rent transfers from abroad) minus the value of consumption offixed capital (the replacement value of capital used up in theprocess of production). The United Nations system of nationalaccounts defines gross national income as “the aggregatevalue of the balances of gross primary incomes for all sectors;(gross national income is identical to gross national product ashitherto understood in national accounts generally).”

Adjusted Net Savings as a Percent of GNI: Adjusted netsavings (previously “genuine savings”) are equal to netnational savings plus education expenditure and minus energydepletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbondioxide damage. Adjusted Net Savings is an indicator of sus-tainability. Persistently negative rates of savings must lead,eventually, to declining well-being. It measures the true rate ofsavings in an economy after taking into account investments inhuman capital, depletion of natural resources, and damagecaused by pollution. For a more complete description of themethodology used by the World Bank, please visit the WorldBank website on Adjusted Net Savings: http://lnweb18.worldbank.org/ESSD/essdext.nsf/44ByDocName/GreenAccounting AdjustedNetSavings.

FREQUENCY OF UPDATE BY DATA PROVIDERSThe World Bank publishes the World Development Indicatorseach year in April. The United Nations Population Division pub-lishes the World Population Prospects every two years. Mostdata updates include revisions of past data. Data may thereforediffer from those reported in past editions of the WorldResources Report.

DATA RELIABILITY AND CAUTIONARY NOTESGross Domestic Product: The World Bank produces the mostreliable global GDP estimates available. However, it should benoted that these data do not account for differences in pur-chasing power. (To see national accounts data without thesedifferences, see PPP (purchasing power parity) estimates.)Informal economic activities sometimes pose a measurementproblem, especially in developing countries, where much eco-nomic activity may go unrecorded. Obtaining a complete pic-ture of the economy requires estimating household outputs pro-

duced for local sale and home use, barter exchanges, and illicitor deliberately unreported activity. Technical improvements andgrowth in services sector are both particularly difficult tomeasure. How consistent and complete such estimates will bedepends on the skill and methods of the compiling statisticiansand the resources available to them.

Income Inequality and International Poverty: Because theunderlying household surveys differ in method and in the typeof data collected, the distribution indicators are not strictlycomparable across countries. These problems are diminishingas survey methods improve and become more standardized, butachieving strict comparability is still impossible. Two sources ofnoncomparability should be noted. First, surveys can differ inmany respects, including whether they use income or consump-tion expenditure as the living standard indicator. The distribu-tion of income is typically more unequal than the distribution ofconsumption. In addition, the definition of income usually dif-fers among surveys. Consumption is usually a much better wel-fare indicator, particularly in developing countries. Second,households differ in size (number of members) and in theextent of income sharing among members. And individuals dif-fer in age and consumption needs. Differences among coun-tries in these respects may bias comparisons of distribution.

International Poverty Line: Many issues arise in measuringhousehold living standards. The choice between income andconsumption as a welfare indicator is one issue. Income is gen-erally more difficult to measure accurately, and consumptionaccords better with the idea of the standard of living. But con-sumption data are not always available, and when they are notthere is little choice but to use income. Household income canalso differ widely, for example, in the number of distinct cate-gories of consumer goods identified. Survey quality varies andeven similar surveys may not be strictly comparable. Compar-isons across countries at different levels of development alsopose a potential problem because of differences in the relativeimportance of consumption of nonmarket goods. The local mar-ket value of all consumption in kind (including consumptionfrom own production, particularly important in underdevelopedrural economies) should be included in the measure of totalconsumption expenditure. Similarly, the imputed profit from pro-duction of nonmarket goods should be included in income. Mostsurvey data now include valuations for consumption or incomefrom own production. Nonetheless, valuation methods vary. Forexample, some surveys use the price in the nearest market,while others use the average farm gate selling price.

Adjusted Net Savings (ANS): The data which were used tocalculate ANS are mostly from official sources, and are gener-ally considered to be reliable. Due to methodological or datalimitations, the calculation omits several important resourcesincluding soils, fish, water resources, and water and air pollu-tants. The calculation is at best an approximation and shouldnot be used as a stand-alone measure of the savings rate of aparticular country. These data are useful as a comparisonmeasure and to demonstrate trends over time.

SOURCESEconomic data are taken from the World Bank’s World Devel-opment Indicators. World Bank. 2002. World Development Indi-cators. Washington: World Bank. Data are available from WorldBank on CD-ROM, or on-line at http://publications.world-bank. org/ecommerce/catalog/product?item_id=631625. Pop-ulation (used to calculate per capita values): Population Divi-sion of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of theUnited Nations Secretariat, 2002. World Population Prospects:The 2000 Revision. New York: United Nations.

249P a r t I I : D a t a T a b l e s

Data Table 4 continued

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (23)

000Metric Kg Per Percent Kg Per Percent Tons Hectare Change Person Change From1999- 1999- Since 1999- Since Animal

2001 {c} 2001 {c} 1989-91 2001 {c} 1989-91 Total ProductsWORLD 2,075,387 9 3,096 15 3 (1) 39 13 18 92 (3) 2,808 460ASIA (EXCL. MIDDLE EAST) 951,041 19 3,678 13 4 4 26 55 35 144 35 2,710 367Armenia 301 .. 1,675 .. 13 67 13 .. 51 14 .. 2,167 309Azerbaijan 1,528 .. 2,373 .. 20 34 14 .. 73 9 .. 2,224 358Bangladesh 39,002 39 3,322 31 13 4 3 12 47 143 69 e 2,201 67Bhutan 159 56 1,456 34 12 13 4 (12) 25 0 (73) e .. ..Cambodia 4,197 62 2,050 43 18 1 15 20 7 3 2,621 2,000 148China {f} 422,218 8 4,869 16 5 (1) 50 87 40 267 42 3,044 567Georgia 554 .. 1,576 .. 22 71 21 .. 44 35 .. 2,347 370India {g} 234,313 20 2,321 21 5 (1) 5 5 35 101 66 e 2,417 192Indonesia {h} 58,954 15 3,860 1 4 10 8 (1) 16 82 8 2,931 132Japan 12,450 (11) 6,147 9 9 67 24 (17) 55 296 (20) e 2,782 574Kazakhstan 14,049 .. 1,162 .. 33 (111) 39 .. 8 1 .. 2,181 587Korea, Dem People's Rep 3,550 (51) 2,753 (39) 41 33 9 (43) 73 88 (78) 2,100 130Korea, Rep 7,559 (10) 6,500 10 4 63 36 65 61 476 11 3,073 439Kyrgyzstan 1,657 .. 2,726 .. 13 12 39 .. 75 21 .. 2,833 541Lao People's Dem Rep 2,279 58 2,978 33 17 1 16 47 18 7 1,572 e 2,152 140Malaysia 2,212 17 3,075 13 3 64 49 39 5 185 41 e 2,947 563Mongolia 156 (78) 716 (35) 37 35 110 (5) 6 3 (78) 1,963 877Myanmar 21,322 51 3,082 13 9 (1) 9 45 18 16 65 e 2,803 117Nepal 6,874 21 2,089 11 8 3 10 0 38 32 25 e 2,264 160Pakistan 28,682 36 2,305 29 8 (4) 12 3 82 122 46 e 2,462 429Philippines 16,917 18 2,571 27 8 18 25 39 15 73 41 2,357 345Singapore .. .. .. .. .. .. 30 (38) .. .. .. e .. ..Sri Lanka 2,901 22 3,270 12 9 30 5 56 35 123 13 2,411 150Tajikistan 383 .. 1,025 .. 30 .. 5 .. 84 56 .. 1,927 144Thailand 29,647 25 2,659 24 7 (20) 31 21 26 90 155 2,411 286Turkmenistan 1,358 .. 1,771 .. 23 .. 28 .. 106 i 63 .. 2,746 487Uzbekistan 3,907 .. 2,603 .. 19 15 21 .. 88 176 .. 2,871 434Viet Nam 33,909 69 4,075 33 13 (8) 25 54 41 250 206 2,564 272EUROPE 393,862 .. 4,187 .. 5 (5) 70 .. 8 78 .. 3,230 906Albania 558 (30) 2,622 0 11 41 21 37 49 19 (87) 2,717 733Austria 4,611 (10) 5,629 3 4 (14) 111 2 0 168 (17) e 3,639 1,184Belarus 4,261 .. 1,722 .. 17 20 61 .. 2 139 .. 3,171 884Belgium .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. e .. ..Bosnia and Herzegovina 1,112 .. 3,034 .. 17 36 7 .. 0 50 .. 2,960 413Bulgaria 5,016 (43) 2,696 (35) 14 (7) 60 (29) 18 36 (82) 2,847 679Croatia 2,889 .. 4,355 .. 7 (13) 28 .. 0 141 .. 2,617 495Czech Rep 6,941 (43) 4,277 (14) 9 (10) 77 (49) 1 88 .. e 3,241 850Denmark 9,187 (0) 6,032 2 8 (16) 380 25 19 176 (28) e 3,317 1,229Estonia 556 .. 1,704 .. 14 20 41 .. 0 26 .. 3,154 821Finland 3,550 (8) 3,071 (9) 11 1 65 (5) 3 144 (36) e 3,143 1,195France 63,527 10 7,088 14 7 (90) 109 7 11 249 (20) e 3,575 1,353Germany 46,651 23 6,749 22 10 (32) 79 (10) 4 244 (37) e 3,411 1,067Greece 4,430 (19) 3,527 (5) 6 16 47 (10) 37 125 (23) 3,689 829Hungary 12,120 (17) 4,392 (15) 12 (22) 106 (29) 4 79 (68) 3,437 1,058Iceland .. .. .. .. .. .. 87 15 .. .. .. 3,313 1,347Ireland 2,044 5 7,241 14 8 21 273 15 .. 637 (5) e 3,649 1,195Italy 20,584 15 4,920 23 3 23 72 5 24 161 (7) e 3,629 937Latvia 882 .. 2,090 .. 12 2 25 .. 1 25 .. 2,904 721Lithuania 2,333 .. 2,480 .. 13 (1) 51 .. 0 51 .. 2,959 669Macedonia, FYR 598 .. 2,711 .. 12 19 17 .. 9 68 .. 2,878 489Moldova, Rep 2,082 .. 2,437 .. 19 (0) 21 .. 14 23 .. 2,728 400Netherlands 1,611 21 7,701 11 8 68 183 2 60 517 (25) e 3,243 1,178Norway 1,290 (8) 3,928 (0) 6 19 58 14 14 225 (11) e 3,425 1,132Poland 25,107 (9) 2,861 (11) 8 8 74 (4) 1 111 (51) e 3,368 894Portugal 1,548 (8) 2,729 35 7 62 74 31 24 94 5 e 3,768 1,067Romania 14,687 (20) 2,569 (17) 16 2 51 (25) 27 31 (77) 3,254 742Russian Federation 67,270 .. 1,767 .. 21 5 30 .. 4 11 .. 2,879 654Serbia and Montenegro 7,716 .. 3,518 .. 14 (11) 81 .. 1 51 .. 2,805 946Slovakia 2,836 .. 3,559 .. 11 (18) 56 .. 11 66 .. e 3,101 800Slovenia 489 .. 4,912 .. 8 55 87 .. 1 376 .. 3,089 1,015Spain 20,274 5 3,047 22 17 18 125 42 20 121 19 e 3,353 929Sweden 5,417 (5) 4,557 (1) 11 (29) 63 7 4 102 (23) e 3,141 1,030Switzerland 1,123 (16) 6,204 (2) 5 31 59 (15) 6 273 (37) e 3,258 1,086Ukraine 28,856 .. 2,226 .. 18 (1) 33 .. 7 15 .. 2,809 611United Kingdom 21,698 (4) 6,836 11 7 (11) 58 1 2 342 (5) e 3,318 1,050MIDDLE EAST & N. AFRICA 78,527 (1) 2,585 14 6 44 21 13 28 62 7 3,003 301Afghanistan 3,257 18 1,285 7 10 .. 15 (12) 30 1 (91) e 1,755 373Algeria 1,819 (27) 929 9 44 89 17 1 7 14 (35) 2,966 300Egypt 19,657 55 7,238 30 10 33 21 53 100 347 (6) e 3,323 241Iran, Islamic Rep 12,990 0 1,806 32 10 44 21 24 39 58 (10) e 2,898 269Iraq 1,408 (45) 530 (43) 25 78 5 (59) 64 69 117 2,446 91Israel 197 (40) 2,411 (19) 23 94 59 14 45 277 22 e 3,542 660Jordan 50 (53) 1,949 87 31 96 27 37 19 61 9 2,834 318Kuwait 3 114 2,260 (45) 26 100 42 111 100 .. .. 3,167 737Lebanon 95 19 2,415 24 6 89 35 10 39 198 156 3,256 460Libyan Arab Jamahiriya 215 (24) 637 (6) 13 88 35 13 22 26 (36) 3,277 386Morocco 3,492 (53) 670 (50) 49 72 19 7 14 33 (8) 3,010 198Oman 5 9 2,266 7 2 98 12 (18) 81 90 20 .. ..Saudi Arabia 2,293 (46) 3,649 (13) 35 75 28 6 43 89 (39) 2,953 446Syrian Arab Rep 3,990 54 1,304 95 16 33 22 23 22 65 42 e 3,272 407Tunisia 1,581 (3) 1,109 (0) 36 68 26 43 7 21 (0) 3,388 322Turkey 28,829 2 2,187 6 6 1 20 (3) 17 75 21 3,469 374United Arab Emirates 0 (85) 598 (69) 64 100 34 25 57 262 47 e 3,182 798Yemen 679 (2) 1,094 26 10 75 9 (16) 29 17 69 2,002 129

Average Production

Per Capita {a}

AverageMeat Production

Kilocalories, 1999

Average Daily Per Capita

Calorie Supply {a,b}Percentage Kg/ha of Percent

IrrigatedLandas a

1987-891997-99 {c}

Fertilizer Use

AverageAnnual

ChangeCrop-land Since

of TotalCropland

1999

Net Tradeof Cereals(imports -

exports) asa Percent of

Consumption2000 {d}

Variationin Domestic

CerealProduction

(% variationfrom mean)1992-2001

of Cereals

PercentChange

Since1989-91

Average CerealCrop Yields

Data Table 5 Agriculture and FoodSources: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, United Nations Population Division.

250W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 2 – 2 0 0 4

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (24)

000Metric Kg Per Percent Kg Per Percent Tons Hectare Change Person Change From1999- 1999- Since 1999- Since Animal

2001 {c} 2001 {c} 1989-91 2001 {c} 1989-91 Total ProductsSUB-SAHARAN AFRICA 87,715 18 1,221 6 7 13 12 (8) 4 12 (5) 2,238 152Angola 570 91 630 86 24 42 11 2 2 1 (83) e 1,873 146Benin 882 56 1,047 22 14 17 10 (22) 1 24 528 e 2,489 92Botswana 21 (64) 146 (52) 52 86 42 (11) 0 12 457 e 2,288 386Burkina Faso 2,594 31 880 23 8 8 11 3 1 14 167 e 2,376 113Burundi 261 (12) 1,290 (5) 7 11 4 (28) 7 3 (7) e 1,628 41Cameroon 1,350 52 1,842 56 12 18 14 (4) 0 6 13 2,260 127Central African Rep 184 78 1,217 30 23 20 25 14 .. 0 (30) 1,978 182Chad 1,181 74 555 (4) 15 4 15 (13) 1 4 153 e 2,206 145Congo 8 (32) 782 8 16 97 9 (6) 0 21 321 2,212 124Congo, Dem Rep 1,616 10 782 (2) 3 16 5 (24) 0 0 (78) 1,637 46Côte d'Ivoire 1,878 53 1,307 49 16 27 10 (3) 1 12 119 2,582 89Equatorial Guinea .. .. .. .. .. .. 1 (5) .. 0 .. e .. ..Eritrea 227 .. 671 .. 49 32 8 .. 4 17 .. 1,646 105Ethiopia {j} 8,812 50 1,164 (6) 21 1 10 (18) 2 15 192 1,803 104Gabon 27 16 1,638 2 5 77 26 (10) 3 0 (89) 2,487 322Gambia 172 73 1,298 20 25 45 5 (25) 1 8 (18) 2,598 124Ghana 1,702 47 1,305 21 6 21 8 (15) 0 3 17 2,590 97Guinea 1,052 67 1,311 25 14 17 5 47 6 2 186 e 2,133 71Guinea-Bissau 157 (5) 1,271 (18) 10 22 15 1 5 1 (18) e 2,245 160Kenya 2,869 (1) 1,477 (6) 9 21 14 (10) 1 31 25 1,886 231Lesotho 322 90 1,337 66 38 32 12 (25) 0 17 26 e 2,300 109Liberia 188 (2) 1,278 24 43 42 7 (19) 1 0 (100) 2,089 66Madagascar 2,583 2 1,831 (6) 4 6 17 (17) 35 2 (3) 1,994 206Malawi 2,650 70 1,634 48 28 4 4 (3) 1 25 (6) 2,164 52Mali 2,690 27 1,113 23 11 5 19 0 3 8 12 2,314 208Mauritania 177 36 718 (14) 17 .. 24 (23) 10 1 (81) e 2,703 412Mozambique 1,656 163 929 130 33 21 5 (18) 3 2 108 e 1,939 55Namibia 106 3 347 (28) 36 .. 49 0 1 0 .. e 2,096 235Niger 2,718 28 358 5 16 11 12 (5) 1 0 (61) e 2,064 110Nigeria 22,729 26 1,197 3 4 9 8 (10) 1 6 (46) 2,833 82Rwanda 239 (17) 891 (23) 19 17 5 5 0 0 (66) e 2,011 54Senegal 1,061 6 854 4 11 44 18 16 3 11 42 e 2,307 206Sierra Leone 241 (57) 1,092 (11) 25 55 5 2 5 2 27 e 2,017 71Somalia 278 (44) 544 (24) 20 30 20 (14) 19 0 (83) 1,555 621South Africa 11,123 (13) 2,334 14 24 6 36 (8) 9 49 (12) 2,805 351Sudan 3,268 18 484 (3) 22 14 22 29 12 4 (11) 2,360 462Tanzania, United Rep 3,787 (8) 1,273 (8) 11 13 9 (12) 3 7 (78) 1,940 125Togo 745 48 1,096 36 12 29 7 (21) 0 7 32 e 2,528 105Uganda 2,200 38 1,605 8 10 5 11 (3) 0 0 413 2,238 133Zambia 1,055 (28) 1,437 (8) 22 7 11 (7) 1 9 (44) 1,934 90Zimbabwe 2,175 (9) 1,221 (18) 30 1 14 4 3 53 3 2,076 105NORTH AMERICA 384,394 11 5,525 26 7 (35) 132 18 10 101 16 3,696 1,038Canada 49,839 (6) 2,772 12 5 (69) 130 29 2 58 23 e 3,161 927United States 334,554 14 5,824 27 7 (32) 133 17 13 111 16 e 3,754 1,050C. AMERICA & CARIBBEAN 33,983 17 2,529 14 3 38 37 26 19 66 (13) 2,850 460Belize 46 67 1,912 17 18 28 43 (0) 3 58 (22) e 2,889 618Costa Rica 319 22 4,023 45 14 70 46 (4) 21 371 91 2,761 506Cuba 541 (1) 2,601 11 23 .. 22 (26) 19 41 (75) 2,490 348Dominican Rep 659 24 4,105 4 11 69 39 25 17 65 25 2,334 341El Salvador 796 1 2,098 14 9 46 36 158 5 109 (4) 2,463 310Guatemala 1,165 (18) 1,779 (9) 10 35 20 21 7 112 67 e 2,331 197Haiti 415 2 899 (10) 6 54 11 28 8 12 290 1,978 117Honduras 589 (11) 1,327 (5) 10 44 22 24 4 79 298 e 2,396 384Jamaica 2 (39) 1,183 (4) 29 100 39 28 9 85 (34) 2,708 455Mexico 28,405 21 2,765 18 4 32 45 33 24 64 (8) 3,168 562Nicaragua 682 50 1,706 15 10 22 21 11 3 15 (44) 2,314 166Panama 347 3 2,732 45 7 49 50 19 5 56 (4) 2,496 549Trinidad and Tobago 12 (28) 2,928 4 30 94 23 (2) 2 64 111 2,703 435SOUTH AMERICA 106,762 45 3,004 39 8 (4) 71 34 9 74 42 2,845 603Argentina 37,398 87 3,397 45 17 (157) 109 1 6 30 406 3,177 1,010Bolivia 1,217 44 1,577 16 9 27 48 21 6 3 (8) e 2,237 410Brazil 49,886 32 2,825 51 6 19 85 60 4 90 36 3,012 642Chile 2,624 (12) 4,453 15 9 42 59 52 78 200 119 2,858 611Colombia 3,622 (11) 3,236 31 6 38 33 (4) 19 140 42 2,567 436Ecuador 1,985 40 2,212 29 7 19 35 41 29 54 116 2,679 439Guyana 564 159 3,960 24 18 (54) 20 138 30 30 2 2,569 412Paraguay 1,153 41 2,092 14 15 (7) 79 (1) 3 29 326 e 2,588 610Peru 3,603 82 2,977 20 22 39 35 51 28 53 (1) 2,621 344Suriname 170 (26) 3,830 2 13 (8) 18 (52) 76 107 49 2,604 394Uruguay 2,055 67 3,796 57 12 (67) 178 21 14 100 96 2,862 1,109Venezuela 2,465 21 3,341 35 8 46 43 7 16 71 (54) 2,229 355OCEANIA 35,238 59 2,976 37 16 (124) 170 3 .. 53 57 2,969 825Australia 34,332 61 2,058 24 16 (145) 195 9 5 44 52 e 3,150 961Fiji 17 (43) 2,619 14 18 89 27 (1) 1 61 (42) 2,934 561New Zealand 870 11 6,303 29 6 21 344 (4) 9 201 123 e 3,152 1,048Papua New Guinea 11 169 4,079 75 21 97 15 9 .. 15 (40) e 2,186 234Solomon Islands 5 .. 3,999 .. 123 88 6 (16) .. .. .. e 2,222 172DEVELOPED 860,966 .. 4,479 .. 3 (16) 79 .. 10 81 .. 3,242 861DEVELOPING 1,210,555 17 3,131 15 4 8 27 44 24 100 38 2,684 346

Figures represent the average supply available for the population as a whole and do not account for variations among individuals. c. Data from three years are averaged to produce the above values. d. Includes food aid. e. Data are collected from July 1 to June 30. Data from 1999, for example, are actually from July 1999 to June 2000. f. Data for China include Taiwan. g. Data relating to Kashmir-Jammu are generally included under India and excluded from figures for Pakistan. Data for Sikkim are included under India. h. Most data for recent years include thosefrom East Timor. i. Inconsistencies with cropland or irrigated land data can cause values to erroneously be reported as greater than 100%. j. Data before 1993 include Eritrea.

a. Data are collected from Oct. 1 to Sept. 30. Data from 1999, for example, are actually from October 1998 to September 1999. b. 1 kilocalorie = 1 Calorie (U.S.) = 4.19 kilojoules.

Average Average Daily Average Cereal Meat Production

Kilocalories, 1999

Per CapitaCrop Yields Per Capita {a} Calorie Supply {a,b}Cereal (imports - as a Fertilizer Use

Kg/ha of

Average Production Variation Net Trade Irrigatedof Cereals in Domestic of Cereals Land

Production exports) as Percentage

AverageAnnual

Consumption Cropland

PercentChange (% variation a Percent of of Total Crop- ChangePercent

land Since1989-91 1992-2001 2000 {d} 1999 1997-99 {c} 1987-89

Since from mean)

251P a r t I I : D a t a T a b l e s

Data Table 5 continuedMore Agriculture and Food data tables are available. Log on to http://earthtrends.wri.org/datatables/agriculture or send ane-mail to [emailprotected] with “Instructions” in the message body.

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (25)

VARIABLE DEFINITIONS AND METHODOLOGYData on agricultural production, yield, and trade published bythe Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations(FAO) are generally gathered by surveys sent to, and filled outby, individual country governments or agencies. These resultsare compiled by FAO, who supplement missing or inaccuratedata with their own estimates.

Average Production of Cereals refers to the amount of cere-als produced in a given country or region each year. Data arereported in thousand metric tons. Cereals include wheat,barley, maize, rye, oats, millet, sorghum, rice, buckwheat,alpiste/canary seed, fonio, quinoa, triticale, wheat flour, and thecereal component of blended foods. Data relate to crops har-vested for dry grain only. Harvesting losses, threshing losses,and unharvested portions of the crop are not included. Produc-tion therefore includes the quantities of the commodity sold inthe market (marketed production) and the quantities consumedor used by the producers (auto-consumption). Cereal cropsharvested for hay or harvested green for food, feed, or silage orused for grazing are excluded, although mixed grains and buck-wheat are included. The time reference on crop production isbased on the calendar year (Jan. to Dec.). That is to say, thedata for any particular crop are reported under the calendaryear in which the entire harvest or the bulk of it took place. In anumber of cases, crops harvested during a split year (startingin November and ending in February, for example) may appearunder two different calendar years.

Average Cereal Crop Yields refers to the amount of grainproduced per unit of harvested area of cereals in a given coun-try or region each year (i.e. average yield=total production/harvested area). Data are reported in kilograms per hectare ofcropland. Area data relate to harvested area. Some countriesreport sown or cultivated area instead; however, in these coun-tries the sown or cultivated area does not differ significantly innormal years from the area actually harvested, either becausepractically the whole area sown is harvested or because thearea surveys are conducted around the harvest period. For mostcountries, FAO does not directly record yield data but insteaddivides production data by the area harvested for a particularcountry and year. In all cases, yields are computed fromdetailed area and production data.

Variation in Domestic Cereal Production, expressed as apercentage, is found by taking the average variation (absolutedeviation from mean) of cereal production between 1992 and2001 and dividing this by the mean production. This is an indica-tor of whether cereal production is stable enough to ensure apredictable food supply. Please refer to the definition of cerealproduction for more information.

Net Trade of Cereals as a Percent of Consumption indi-cates whether countries are able to produce sufficient grain fordomestic consumption. It is calculated by dividing net imports(imports minus exports) by total cereal consumption (produc-tion + imports – exports). Import and export data have, for themost part, been supplied to FAO by governments through mag-netic tapes, national publications and, most frequently, FAOquestionnaires. Official trade data have sometimes been sup-plemented with data from unofficial sources, or trade informa-tion supplied by other national or international agencies ororganizations. Cereal food aid shipments are included in FAO’simport and export calculations. Information on food aid ship-ments has been provided to FAO by the World Food Program(please see http://www.wfp.org).

Average Meat Production Per Capita refers to the mass ofmeat in kilograms produced annually per person in a givencountry. Values were calculated by dividing the amount of meat

produced (in kilograms) by the population of a given country ina given year. Total meat production comprises horse meat, poul-try meat and meat from all other domestic or wild animals suchas camels, rabbits, reindeer, and game animals. Both commer-cial and farm slaughter are included. Meat production for mostspecies is calculated by multiplying the number of animalsslaughtered by the average dressed carcass weight. Dressedcarcass weights exclude offal and slaughter fats. Data relate toanimals slaughtered within national boundaries, irrespective oftheir origin. Production data were collected mostly from annualFAO surveys completed by governments. Data have beengrouped in 12-month periods ending 30 September of the yearsstated in the tables. For example, animals enumerated in agiven country at any time between 1 October and 30 Septemberof the following year are shown under the latter year.

Irrigated Land as a Percentage of Total Cropland refers tothe proportion of cropland equipped to provide water to crops.These include areas equipped for full and partial control irriga-tion, spate irrigation areas, and equipped wetland or inland val-ley bottoms.

Cropland includes arable and permanent cropland. Arable landis land under temporary crops (double-cropped areas arecounted only once), temporary meadows for mowing or pasture,land under market and kitchen gardens, and land temporarilyfallow (less than five years). Abandoned land resulting fromshifting cultivation is not included in this category. Permanentcropland is land cultivated with crops that occupy the land forlong periods and need not be replanted after each harvest,such as cocoa, coffee, and rubber; this category includes landunder flowering shrubs, fruit trees, nut trees, and vines, butexcludes land under trees grown for wood or timber. Data onland use are reported by country governments in question-naires distributed by the FAO. However, for this variable, a sig-nificant percentage of data is based on FAO estimates, andsome data are based on unofficial estimates.

Average Annual Fertilizer Use measures the amount of thenutrients nitrogen (N), potash (K2O), and phosphate (P2O5)consumed annually per unit of cropland (see above for moreinformation on cropland data). Data are reported in kg perhectare of cropland. Some countries report data based on thefertilizer year, from 1 July–30 June. For these countries, 1999data were actually collected from 1 July 1999 to 30 June 2000.Data are collected through the FAO fertilizer questionnaire.

Average Daily Per Capita Calorie Supply refers to theamount of available food per person, per day, expressed in kilo-calories (1 kilocalorie = 1 Calorie = 4.19 kilojoules). CalorieSupply From Animal Products refers to the amount of avail-able food from animal products per person, per day. Animalproducts include: all types of meat and fish; animal fats andfish oils; edible offal; milk, butter, cheese, and cream; and eggsand egg products. FAO compiles statistics on apparent foodconsumption based on Supply/Utilization Accounts (SUAs)maintained in FAOSTAT. SUAs are time series data dealingwith statistics on supply and utilization. For each product, theSUA traces supplies from production, imports, and stocks toutilization in different forms—addition to stocks, exports, ani-mal feed, seed, processing for food and non-food purposes,waste (or losses), and lastly, as food available to the popula-tion, where appropriate. For internal consistency, total supplybalances with total utilization. In many cases, commodities arenot consumed in the primary form in which they are presented,e.g., cereals enter the household mainly in processed form likeflour, meal, husked or milled rice. To take this fact into account,the caloric value has been derived by applying the appropriatefood composition factors to the quantities of the processedcommodities, not by examining primary commodities. Per

252W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 2 – 2 0 0 4

Data Table 5 continued

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (26)

capita supplies are derived from the total supplies available forhuman consumption by dividing the quantities of food by thetotal population actually partaking of the food supplies duringthe reference period. In almost all cases, the population figuresused are the mid-year estimates published by the UnitedNations Population Division.

FREQUENCY OF UPDATE BY DATA PROVIDERS Data from FAO are updated annually, with the exception of pro-duction data, which are updated three times each year, andtrade data, which are updated semiannually. Population dataused in per capita calculations are updated every two years bythe United Nations Population Division. These updates ofteninclude revisions of past data.

DATA RELIABILITY AND CAUTIONARY NOTESAgricultural data on production and trade reported to FAO aregoverned by established accounting practices and are thereforegenerally considered to be reliable. However, countries vary inthe quality of data they have available to report. In addition,problems arise in compiling these data into internationallycomparable agricultural statistics and in estimating data thatare missing. Each variable in FAO’s database can have as manyas 30,000 data points associated with it for different countriesand years. Officials need to ascertain, based on limited infor-mation, which one of various figures reported by varioussources (national publications, FAO questionnaires, interna-tional publications, etc.) is the most recent or the most reliable.Variable definitions and coverage do not always conform toFAO recommendations, and therefore may not always be com-pletely consistent across countries.

Production of subsistence crops and livestock is seldomreported in records of sales and processing, resulting in miss-ing data points. Estimates of missing data are usually made byfollowing the observed trend of the commodity in question inprevious years, while also considering the trends in neighboringcountries. When a complete time series is missing for a partic-ular data set, FAO officials base their estimates on first-handaccounts through country visits and data from neighboring

countries. For more information, please refer tohttp://www.fao.org/ES/ESS/index.htm.

Cereal Production and Yields rely on accurate estimates ofthe sown and harvested crop area. However, in many countries,governments change the area sown each year to control pricesand production through subsidies and other programs. Weather,soil quality, and seed availability often affect crop area indeveloping countries.

Average Meat Production estimates rely on accurate produc-tion figures from processing plants and import/export figures oflive animals. Trade data are usually given by number rather thanby weight, and the size of most domestic animals can vary by afactor of 10 or more depending on the age and condition of theanimal. As a result, estimates of “average carcass weight”used to determine meat production vary in accuracy.

Average Annual Fertilizer Use data are excluded for somecountries with a relatively small area of cropland, such as Ice-land and Singapore. In these cases, the calculation of fertilizerconsumed per hectare of cropland yields an unreliable number.

Per Capita Calorie Supply figures shown in the commoditybalances represent only the average supply available for thepopulation as a whole and do not necessarily indicate what isactually consumed by individuals. Even if data are used asapproximations of per capita consumption, it is important tonote that there could be considerable variation in consumptionamong individuals. Food supply data are only as accurate as theunderlying production, trade, and utilization data.

SOURCES Agricultural Variables: Food and Agriculture Organization ofthe United Nations (FAO). 2002. FAOSTAT On-line StatisticalService. Rome: FAO. Data available on-line at:http://apps.fao. org/. Population (used to calculate percapita values): Population Division of the Department of Eco-nomic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat.2002. World Population Prospects: The 2000 Revision. New York:United Nations. Data set on CD-ROM.

253P a r t I I : D a t a T a b l e s

Data Table 5 continued

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (27)

Wetlandsof Int'l Biosphere

Importance ReservesPercent Number of Area Area Number Breeding Number Number Live

Total of Land Marine (000 ha) (000 ha) Known Threat- Bird Threat- Known Threat- Pri- Live AnimalNumber Protected Areas {c} 2002 2002 Species ened Species ened Species ened mates Parrots Skins {d}

WORLD {e} 63,478 11.3 .. 102,283 439,000 .. .. .. .. .. .. 35,421 518,577 3,698,726ASIA (EXCL. MIDDLE EAST) 3,655 7.6 .. 5,641 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. (19,366) (136,381) (1,406,468)Armenia 5 7.6 .. 492 .. 84 11 236 4 3,553 1 .. (2) ..Azerbaijan 35 6.1 3 100 .. 99 13 229 8 4,300 0 .. .. ..Bangladesh 10 0.8 3 606 .. 125 23 166 23 5,000 12 .. 89 ..Bhutan 10 25.1 .. .. .. 160 22 209 12 5,468 7 .. .. ..Cambodia 23 18.5 1 55 1,481 123 24 183 19 .. 29 (200) .. ..China 809 7.8 30 2,548 3,316 394 79 618 74 32,200 168 (10,519) (192,459) 67,287Georgia 17 2.3 1 34 .. 107 13 208 3 4,350 .. .. (1) ..India 497 5.2 60 195 1,515 390 88 458 72 18,664 244 .. 4 0Indonesia 1,080 20.6 95 243 2,062 515 147 929 114 29,375 384 (3,324) 25,025 (834,103)Japan 96 6.8 19 84 116 188 37 210 34 5,565 11 4,863 27,417 427,978Kazakhstan 73 2.7 1 .. .. 178 16 379 15 6,000 1 7 3 ..Korea, Dem People's Rep 31 2.6 .. .. 132 .. 13 150 19 2,898 3 25 4 1,828Korea, Rep 30 6.9 7 1 39 49 13 138 25 2,898 0 51 370 57,126Kyrgyzstan 78 3.6 .. .. 4,335 83 7 168 4 4,500 1 .. .. ..Lao People's Dem Rep 20 12.5 .. .. .. 172 31 212 20 8,286 18 .. .. (4)Malaysia 190 5.7 63 38 .. 300 50 254 37 15,500 681 76 11,297 (772,717)Mongolia 42 11.5 .. 631 6,139 133 14 274 16 2,823 0 .. .. ..Myanmar 4 0.3 1 .. .. 300 39 310 35 7,000 37 (4) 67 ..Nepal 15 8.9 .. 18 .. 181 31 274 25 6,973 6 2 135 ..Pakistan 83 4.9 2 284 66 188 19 237 17 4,950 2 20 (17,274) ..Philippines 43 5.7 7 68 1,174 153 50 404 67 8,931 193 (2,085) 788 1,009Singapore 5 4.9 .. .. .. 85 3 142 7 2,282 54 83 5,484 (301,905)Sri Lanka 110 13.5 13 8 36 88 22 126 14 3,314 280 (3) 476 ..Tajikistan 19 4.2 .. 95 .. 84 9 210 7 5,000 2 .. .. ..Thailand 158 13.9 18 132 85 265 37 285 37 11,625 78 63 2,587 (36,938)Turkmenistan 23 4.2 1 .. 35 103 13 204 6 .. 0 .. .. ..Uzbekistan 11 2.0 .. .. 57 97 9 203 9 4,800 1 (1) 98 ..Viet Nam 107 3.7 7 12 333 213 40 262 37 10,500 126 (3,149) (2,751) (109,458)EUROPE 39,432 8.3 .. 19,248 128,034 .. .. .. .. .. .. 13,583 305,812 1,868,230Albania 52 3.8 7 20 .. 68 3 193 3 3,031 0 .. .. ..Austria 719 33.0 .. 118 47 83 7 230 3 3,100 3 4 (3) 401Belarus 903 6.3 .. 204 305 74 7 194 3 2,100 0 .. .. ..Belgium 73 X 2 8 .. 58 11 191 2 1,550 0 792 6,841 230Bosnia and Herzegovina 21 0.5 .. 7 .. 72 10 205 3 .. 1 .. .. ..Bulgaria 127 4.5 1 3 38 81 14 248 10 3,572 0 (3) 41 (2)Croatia 195 7.5 13 80 200 76 9 224 4 4,288 0 18 15 ..Czech Rep 1,789 16.1 .. 42 435 81 8 205 2 1,900 4 101 (14,058) 3Denmark 255 34.0 52 2,283 97,200 43 5 196 1 1,450 3 (9) (365) 1,632Estonia 219 11.8 3 216 1,560 65 4 204 3 1,630 0 (3) 0 122Finland 270 9.3 3 139 770 60 5 243 3 1,102 1 .. 6 ..France 1,325 13.3 70 795 900 93 18 283 5 4,630 2 3,437 12,422 310,941Germany 7,315 31.9 .. 829 1,559 76 11 247 5 2,682 12 1,129 4,927 403,919Greece 88 3.6 10 164 9 95 13 255 7 4,992 2 58 19,717 281Hungary 186 7.0 .. 154 129 83 9 208 8 2,214 1 (33) (275) 19,858Iceland 79 9.8 5 59 .. 11 6 93 0 377 0 (40) 197 1Ireland 73 1.7 3 67 11 25 5 143 1 950 1 1 13 ..Italy 427 7.9 28 57 204 90 14 250 5 5,599 3 270 27,557 776,148Latvia 209 13.4 2 43 474 83 4 216 3 1,153 0 (15) (4) ..Lithuania 79 10.3 3 50 .. 68 5 201 4 1,796 0 .. 155 ..Macedonia, FYR 26 7.1 .. 19 .. 78 11 199 3 3,500 0 .. .. ..Moldova, Rep 63 1.4 .. 19 .. 68 6 175 5 1,752 0 .. .. ..Netherlands 86 14.2 10 327 260 55 10 192 4 1,221 0 1,364 1,094 73Norway 178 6.8 10 70 .. 54 10 241 2 1,715 2 (2) 7,386 42Poland 579 12.4 4 90 398 84 15 233 4 2,450 4 54 683 (735)Portugal 58 6.6 16 66 1 63 17 235 7 5,050 15 14 79,785 618Romania 157 4.7 7 665 662 84 17 257 8 3,400 1 .. 11 18Russian Federation 10,863 7.8 14 10,324 20,532 269 45 528 38 11,400 7 2,112 3,001 (457)Serbia and Montenegro 104 3.3 .. 40 .. 96 12 238 5 4,082 1 2,047 (1) ..Slovakia 1,040 22.8 .. 38 241 85 9 199 4 3,124 2 1 (2,519) 4Slovenia 32 6.0 1 1 .. 75 9 201 1 3,200 0 .. 1,187 140Spain 328 8.5 27 158 1,181 82 24 281 7 5,050 14 452 152,460 251,411Sweden 3,632 9.1 46 515 97 60 7 259 2 1,750 3 (10) (6,145) 12Switzerland 2,177 30.0 .. 7 212 75 5 199 2 3,030 2 (40) 129 18,893Ukraine 5,182 3.9 10 716 343 108 16 245 8 5,100 1 3 89 3United Kingdom 579 20.9 95 855 30 50 12 229 2 1,623 13 1,881 7,828 84,667MIDDLE EAST & N. AFRICA 561 9.2 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. (296) 50,330 2,428Afghanistan 7 0.3 .. .. .. 119 13 181 11 4,000 1 .. .. ..Algeria 18 5.0 4 1,866 7,312 92 13 183 6 3,164 2 .. 4 (3)Egypt 35 9.7 12 106 2,456 98 13 123 7 2,076 2 (13) (17) (1)Iran, Islamic Rep 78 4.8 6 1,476 2,753 140 22 293 13 8,000 1 55 2 ..Iraq 8 0.0 .. .. .. 81 11 140 11 .. 0 .. .. ..Israel 188 15.8 8 0 27 116 14 162 12 2,317 0 (273) 6,852 1Jordan 11 3.4 .. 7 31 71 10 117 8 2,100 0 (4) 373 ..Kuwait 5 1.5 2 .. .. 21 1 35 7 234 0 .. 16,278 0Lebanon 3 0.5 1 1 .. 57 5 116 7 3,000 0 2 1,926 528Libyan Arab Jamahiriya 8 0.1 3 .. .. 76 8 76 1 1,825 1 .. 0 ..Morocco 12 0.7 4 14 9,754 105 16 206 9 3,675 2 (5) 48 38Oman 6 14.0 2 .. .. 56 9 109 10 1,204 6 14 22 ..Saudi Arabia 78 38.3 3 .. .. 77 8 125 15 2,028 3 86 9,699 438Syrian Arab Rep X X .. 10 .. 63 4 145 8 3,000 0 .. (1) ..Tunisia 7 0.3 2 13 74 78 11 165 5 2,196 0 5 432 ..Turkey 78 1.6 14 159 .. 116 17 278 11 8,650 3 6 2,147 1,422United Arab Emirates 2 0.0 .. .. .. 25 3 34 8 .. 0 29 9,241 5Yemen X X .. .. .. 66 5 93 12 1,650 52 .. .. ..

International Legal Net Trade

(imports minus exports) {b}Mammals Birds Higher Plants Reported by CITES, 2000

Known and Threatened Species (1992-2002)Nationally Protected Areas

Management Categories Protected Areas Under IUCN

I - VI (1992-2003) {a}

Data Table 6 Biodiversity and Protected AreasSources: United Nations Environment Programme-World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC), Ramsar ConventionBureau, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), World Conservation Union (IUCN),Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna (CITES).

254W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 2 – 2 0 0 4

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (28)

Wetlandsof Int'l Biosphere

Importance ReservesPercent Number of Area Area Number Breeding Number Number Live

Total of Land Marine (000 ha) (000 ha) Known Threat- Bird Threat- Known Threat- Pri- Live AnimalNumber Protected Areas {c} 2002 2002 Species ened Species ened Species ened mates Parrots Skins {d}

SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA 1,486 8.8 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. (12,677) (201,235) (399,556)Angola 14 6.6 4 .. .. 276 19 265 15 5,185 19 .. (8) ..Benin 5 11.4 .. 139 623 188 8 112 2 2,500 11 1 2 ..Botswana 12 18.5 .. 6,864 .. 164 6 184 7 2,151 0 .. 349 (85)Burkina Faso 13 11.5 .. 299 186 147 7 138 2 1,100 2 (1) (3) (1)Burundi 13 5.7 1 1 .. 107 6 145 7 2,500 2 .. .. ..Cameroon 18 4.5 2 .. 876 409 40 165 15 8,260 155 (36) (18,057) (12)Central African Rep 14 8.7 .. .. 1,640 209 14 168 3 3,602 10 .. (19) ..Chad 9 9.1 .. 1,843 .. 134 17 141 5 1,600 2 .. 1 (76,139)Congo 12 5.0 1 439 246 200 15 130 3 6,000 33 (2) (2,102) ..Congo, Dem Rep 43 6.5 .. 866 283 450 40 345 28 11,007 55 (22) (15,780) ..Côte d'Ivoire 12 6 3 19 1,770 230 19 252 12 3,660 101 (5) (2,727) (5)Equatorial Guinea X X .. .. .. 184 16 172 5 3,250 23 (1) (5) ..Eritrea 3 4.3 .. .. .. 112 12 138 7 .. 3 .. .. ..Ethiopia 39 16.9 .. .. .. 277 35 262 16 6,603 22 .. .. (931)Gabon 3 0.7 2 1,080 15 190 15 156 5 6,651 71 42 (42) ..Gambia 6 2.3 5 20 .. 117 3 154 2 974 3 1 15 ..Ghana 16 5.6 .. 178 8 222 14 206 8 3,725 115 (44) (2) (15)Guinea 3 0.7 .. 4,779 261 190 12 109 10 3,000 21 (27) (17,584) (16,012)Guinea-Bissau X X .. 39 110 108 3 235 0 1,000 4 .. (7) ..Kenya 68 8.0 11 91 1,335 359 51 344 24 6,506 98 (218) (32) (2,465)Lesotho 1 0.2 .. .. .. 33 3 123 7 1,591 0 .. .. ..Liberia 2 1.7 1 .. .. 193 17 146 11 2,200 46 .. (3,000) (1)Madagascar 62 4.3 2 53 293 141 50 172 27 9,505 162 0 (3,899) (5,601)Malawi 9 11.2 .. 225 45 195 8 219 11 3,765 14 .. 2 (199)Mali 13 3.7 .. 162 2,500 137 13 191 4 1,741 6 .. (6,829) (69,323)Mauritania 9 1.7 3 1,231 .. 61 10 172 2 1,100 0 .. 10 (1)Mozambique 12 8.4 6 .. .. 179 14 144 16 5,692 36 (1) (57) (758)Namibia 21 13.6 4 630 .. 250 15 201 11 3,174 5 2 1,007 (261)Niger 6 7.7 .. 715 25,128 131 11 125 3 1,460 2 17 2 ..Nigeria 27 3.3 .. 58 131 274 27 286 9 4,715 119 .. 0 (3)Rwanda 6 6.2 .. .. 13 151 9 200 9 2,288 3 .. .. ..Senegal 14 11.6 6 100 1,094 192 12 175 4 2,086 7 (154) (30,283) 8,950Sierra Leone 6 2.1 .. 295 .. 147 12 172 10 2,090 43 .. (1,108) (75)Somalia 10 0.8 1 .. .. 171 19 179 10 3,028 17 .. .. ..South Africa 542 5.5 20 499 3,371 247 42 304 28 23,420 45 (342) (99,390) (26,761)Sudan 27 5.2 1 .. 1,251 267 23 280 6 3,137 17 .. 51 (152,270)Tanzania, United Rep 98 29.8 .. 4,272 5,228 316 42 229 33 10,008 236 (4,424) (82) (1,582)Togo 9 7.9 .. 194 .. 196 9 117 0 3,085 9 .. (436) (4,079)Uganda 54 24.6 .. 15 247 345 20 243 13 4,900 33 .. .. (508)Zambia 77 31.9 .. 333 .. 233 11 252 11 4,747 8 2 54 (12,428)Zimbabwe 68 12.1 .. .. .. 270 11 229 10 4,440 14 (1) (1,226) (53,403)NORTH AMERICA 7,412 23.4 .. 14,241 35,943 .. .. .. .. .. .. 15,476 26,860 213,733Canada 3,822 11.1 109 13,052 4,373 193 14 310 8 3,270 1 629 2,716 1,839United States 3,481 25.9 229 1,190 31,570 428 37 508 55 19,473 .. 14,845 24,034 211,894C. AMERICA & CARIBBEAN 1,476 15.1 .. 3,186 15,729 .. .. .. .. .. .. (530) (3,400) 710,492Belize 53 45.1 11 7 .. 125 4 161 2 2,894 28 .. (68) ..Costa Rica 130 23.0 14 313 729 205 14 279 13 12,119 109 2 118 ..Cuba 321 69.1 43 452 1,384 31 11 86 18 6,522 160 1 (15,944) ..Dominican Rep {f} 61 51.9 12 20 .. 20 5 79 15 5,657 29 6 662 ..El Salvador 3 0.4 2 2 .. 135 2 141 0 2,911 23 6 0 (50)Guatemala 42 20.0 3 503 2,350 250 6 221 6 8,681 77 (5) 3,757 ..Haiti 8 0.4 .. .. .. 20 4 62 14 5,242 27 .. .. ..Honduras 72 6.4 10 172 800 173 10 232 5 5,680 108 4 1,412 ..Jamaica 143 84.6 2 6 .. 24 5 75 12 3,308 206 .. .. 2Mexico 224 10.2 34 1,157 6,770 491 70 440 39 26,071 .. 500 10,190 694,613Nicaragua 73 17.8 4 406 2,182 200 6 215 5 7,590 39 (6) (6,327) (3,164)Panama 33 21.7 10 111 1,515 218 20 302 16 9,915 193 38 1,084 19,090Trinidad and Tobago 25 6.0 6 6 .. 100 1 131 1 2,259 1 0 147 ..SOUTH AMERICA 1,697 10.6 .. 23,360 163,832 .. .. .. .. .. .. (1,812) (50,450) (1,023,927)Argentina 320 6.6 26 2,670 2,848 320 34 362 39 9,372 42 2 (18,474) (326,123)Bolivia 23 13.4 .. 5,504 735 316 24 504 28 17,367 70 .. (2) ..Brazil 802 6.7 70 6,346 125,042 394 81 686 114 56,215 .. 14 31 18,460Chile 87 18.9 26 100 2,479 91 21 157 22 5,284 40 (2) 547 ..Colombia 101 10.2 11 439 3,338 359 41 708 78 51,220 213 (4) 97 (544,565)Ecuador {f} 27 18.3 4 83 17,375 302 33 640 62 19,362 197 (1) (1) (2)Guyana 1 0.3 .. .. .. 193 11 242 2 6,409 23 (1,220) (12,562) ..Paraguay 20 3.5 .. 775 280 305 10 233 26 7,851 10 .. (1,477) (171,373)Peru 36 6.1 4 6,759 3,268 460 49 695 76 17,144 269 (321) (2,171) (3)Suriname 18 4.9 4 12 .. 180 12 235 1 5,018 27 (283) (9,410) ..Uruguay 13 0.3 4 407 200 81 6 115 11 2,278 1 .. (8,929) ..Venezuela 195 63.8 16 264 8,266 323 26 547 24 21,073 67 3 1,901 (321)OCEANIA 7,759 13.2 .. 5,944 5,478 .. .. .. .. .. .. 0 (4,496) (13,443)Australia {f} 4,071 13.4 285 5,310 5,478 252 63 497 37 15,638 38 102 (75) (10,440)Fiji 15 1.1 2 .. .. 4 5 47 12 1,518 65 (1) (70)New Zealand 3,515 29.6 67 39 .. 2 8 190 63 2,382 21 0 (4,004) 50Papua New Guinea 29 2.3 9 595 .. 214 58 414 32 11,544 142 .. (1) (2,980)Solomon Islands 1 0.3 1 .. .. 53 20 111 23 3,172 16 .. (406) ..DEVELOPED 55,408 12.0 .. 40,142 177,396 .. .. .. .. .. .. 33,413 263,460 2,472,791DEVELOPING 8,070 10.7 .. 60,580 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. (34,641) (276,420) (2,521,302)

Reported by CITES, 2000I - VI (1992-2003) {a} (imports minus exports) {b}

a. Does not include data protected under international agreements. Data on Total Number and Percent of Land Protected are from a preliminary version of the World Database on Protected Areas and are incomplete for many countries. Please consult UNEP-WCMC for an updated version of this data set. b. CITES trade is expressed as the balance of imports minus exports. Exports are shown as negative balance (in parentheses). c. Includes both marine and littoral areas with substantial terrestrial components that reach the shore. d. Trade in animal skins includes the skins of crocodiles, wild cats, lizards, and snakes. e. World totals include countries that are not listed here; World values for CITES trade data represent net exports f. Extent of protected areas may include marine components that artificially inflate the percentage of land area protected.

Management Categories Mammals Birds Higher Plants

Nationally Protected AreasProtected Areas Under IUCN Known and Threatened Species (1992-2002) International Legal Net Trade

255P a r t I I : D a t a T a b l e s

Data Table 6 continuedMore data tables are available. Log on to http://earthtrends.wri.org/datatables/biodiversity or send an e-mail [emailprotected] with “Instructions” in the message body.

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (29)

VARIABLE DEFINITIONS AND METHODOLOGYAn IUCN Management Protected Area is defined by IUCNas “an area of land and/or sea especially dedicated to the pro-tection and maintenance of biological diversity, and of naturaland associated cultural resources, and managed through legalor other effective means.” As of Fall 2002 a World Database onProtected Areas (WDPA) consortium has been working to pro-duce an improved and updated database available in the publicdomain. Summary information presented in the WDPA, ofwhich UNEP-WCMC is the custodian, includes the legal desig-nation, name, IUCN Management Category, size in hectares,location (latitude and longitude), and the year of establishmentfor over 100,000 sites. On May 9, 2003, UNEP-WCMC providedWRI with preliminary—and incomplete—protected areas data.IUCN categorizes protected areas by management objectiveand has identified six distinct categories of protected areas:

Category Ia. Strict nature reserve: A protected area managedmainly for scientific research and monitoring; an area of landand/or sea possessing some outstanding or representativeecosystems, geological or physiological features and/orspecies.

Category Ib. Wilderness area: A protected area managed mainlyfor wilderness protection; a large area of unmodified or slightlymodified land and/or sea retaining its natural character andinfluence, without permanent or significant habitation, which isprotected and managed so as to preserve its natural condition.

Category II. National park: A protected area managed mainlyfor ecosystem protection and recreation; a natural area of landand/or sea designated to: (a) protect the ecological integrity ofone or more ecosystems for present and future generations;(b) exclude exploitation or occupation inimical to the purposesof designation of the area; and (c) provide a foundation forspiritual, scientific, educational, recreational, and visitor oppor-tunities, all of which must be environmentally and culturallycompatible.

Category III. Natural monument: A protected area managedmainly for conservation of specific natural features; an areacontaining one or more specific natural or natural/cultural fea-tures that is of outstanding or unique value because of itsinherent rarity, representative or aesthetic qualities, or culturalsignificance.

Category IV. Habitat/species management area: A protectedarea managed mainly for conservation through managementintervention; an area of land and/or sea subject to active inter-vention for management purposes so as to ensure the mainte-nance of habitats and/or to meet the requirements of specificspecies.

Category V. Protected landscape/seascape: A protected areamanaged mainly for landscape/seascape conservation andrecreation; an area of land, with coast and sea as appropriate,where the interaction of people and nature over time has pro-duced an area of distinct character with significant aesthetic,ecological, and/or cultural value, and often with high biologicaldiversity.

Category VI. Managed mainly for the sustainable use of naturalecosystems. These areas contain predominantly unmodifiednatural systems, managed to ensure long-term protection andmaintenance of biological diversity, while also providing a sus-tainable flow of natural products and services to meet commu-nity needs.

IUCN defines a Marine Protected Area as: “any area of inter-tidal or subtidal terrain, together with its overlying water and

associated flora and fauna, historical and cultural features,which has been reserved by law or other effective means toprotect part or all of the enclosed environment.”

These marine protected areas (MPAs) include areas that arefully marine and areas that have only a small percentage ofintertidal land. Many MPAs have large terrestrial areas. Theextent of the marine portion of most protected areas is rarelydocumented. The degree of protection varies from one countryto another, and may bear little relationship to the legal status ofany site. “Littoral” is defined as any site which is known toincorporate at least some intertidal area.

Ramsar Sites, or Wetlands of International Importance, aredefined under the Wetlands Convention, signed in Ramsar, Iran,in 1971. In order to qualify as a Ramsar site, an area must have“international significance in terms of ecology, botany, zoology,limnology or hydrology.” The Convention on Wetlands is an inter-governmental treaty that provides the framework for nationalaction and international cooperation for the conservation andwise use of wetlands and their resources. There are presently133 Contracting Parties to the Convention, with 1,179 wetlandsites totaling 102.1 million hectares, designated for inclusion inthe Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance.

Biosphere Reserves are terrestrial and coastal/marine envi-ronments recognized under UNESCO’s Man and the BiosphereProgramme. Selected for their value to conservation, they areintended to foster the scientific knowledge and skills necessaryfor improving the balance between people and nature, and forpromoting sustainable development. Ideally, fully functionalbiosphere reserves perform three main roles: (i) conservationin situ of natural and semi-natural ecosystems and landscapes;(ii) the establishment of demonstration areas for ecologicallyand socio-culturally sustainable resource use; and (iii) the pro-vision of logistic support for research, monitoring, education,training, and information exchange. Each biosphere reserveconsists of three elements: a minimally disturbed core area forconservation and research; a buffer zone where traditional landuses, research, and ecosystem rehabilitation may be permitted;and a transition area. This data table lists the acreage of allthree elements; however, only the core area requires legal pro-tection. Biosphere reserves are nominated by national govern-ments and remain under the sovereign jurisdiction of the statewhere they are located. As of August 2002, there are 408 bio-sphere reserves in 94 countries. Several countries share trans-boundary biosphere reserves. These sites are counted onlyonce in regional and world totals.

The Total Number of Known Species refers to the totalnumber of a particular type of species in a given country. Dataon known mammals exclude marine mammals. Data onknown birds include only birds that breed in that country, notthose that migrate or winter there. The number of knownhigher plants includes ferns and fern allies, conifers andcycads, and flowering plants that have been classified asthreatened by IUCN.

The number of known species is collected by WCMC from avariety of sources, including, but not limited to: national reportsfrom the convention on biodiversity, other national documents,independent studies, and other texts. Data are updated on acontinual basis as they become available; however, updatesvary widely by country. While some countries (WCMC esti-mates about 12) have data that were updated in the last 6months, other species estimates have not changed since thedata were first collected in 1992.

The Number of Threatened Species listed for all countriesincludes full species that are “Critically Endangered, Endan-

256W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 2 – 2 0 0 4

Data Table 6 continued

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (30)

gered, or Vulnerable,” but excludes introduced species, specieswhose status is insufficiently known (categorized by IUCN as“data deficient”), those known to be extinct, and those forwhich status has not been assessed (categorized by IUCN as“not evaluated”).

CITES Trade Data:The international trade in wildlife andwildlife products, worth billions of dollars annually, causesserious declines in the numbers of many species of animalsand plants. In response, the Convention on International Tradein Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) wasdrawn up in 1973 to protect wildlife against such overexploita-tion and to prevent international trade from threatening specieswith extinction. Species are listed in appendixes to CITES onthe basis of their degree of rarity and the threat posed by trade.International trade in either the listed species themselves or inproducts derived from the species requires permits or certifi-cates for export, import, and re-export.

Parties to the Convention are required to submit annualreports, including trade records, to the CITES Secretariat.These trade records are compiled in the CITES Trade Databaseand were given to WRI by UNEP-WCMC.

Net Trade in 2000 is the balance of imports minus exports.Exports are shown as a negative balance in parentheses. Fig-ures are for trade reported in 2000. Data on net exports and netimports as reported by CITES correspond to legal internationaltrade and are based on permits issued, not actual items traded.Figures may be overestimates if not all permits are used thatyear. Some permits issued in one year are used at a later date;therefore, numbers of exports and imports may not matchexactly for any given year. World totals show the total numberof exports, since calculating the balance of trade for the worldwould have canceled most figures.

Number of live primates includes all species of monkeys,apes, and prosimians listed under CITES that were traded livein 2000. Number of live parrots includes individuals from thePsittaciformes species listed under CITES that were tradedlive in 2000. Number of animal skins includes whole skins ofall crocodile, cat, lizard, and snake species that were traded in2000.

FREQUENCY OF UPDATE BY DATA PROVIDERS Protected Areas Data. At the time of publication, the WDPAwas under revision. The current version is expected to be final-ized prior to the World Parks Congress in September 2003.Please contact UNEP-WCMC for more information. Knownspecies of plants and mammals are updated when new infor-mation is provided to WCMC (see above); contact WCMC forthe latest data. Threatened species data are updated by IUCNon a continual basis. CITES trade data refer to annualreports. Table data is for the calendar year 2000. Data areupdated annually.

DATA RELIABILITY AND CAUTIONARY NOTES: Protected areas serve a vital function in protecting theearth’s resources. But they face many challenges—externalthreats associated with pollution and climate change, irre-sponsible tourism, infrastructure developments and the ever

increasing demands for land and water resources. Protectedareas are also particularly susceptible to invasive species. Inaddition, many areas lack political support and have inadequatefinancial and other resources. Due to variations in consistencyand methodology of collection, data on protected areas arehighly variable among countries. Some countries update theirinformation with greater regularity; others may have moreaccurate data on extent of coverage. Additionally, at the time ofpublication, the protected areas data set was under revisionand incomplete. Many countries have an underreported numberand/or extent of protected areas within their borders. Pleasecontact UNEP-WCMC for a revised data set.

Data on known species of mammals, birds and plants arepreliminary estimates based on a compilation of available datafrom a large variety of sources. They are not based on specieschecklists. Data have been collected over the last decade with-out a consistent approach to taxonomy. Additionally, while thenumber of species in each country does change, not all coun-tries have been updated; some data may not reflect recenttrends. Finally, users should be aware of greater inconsistencyand less reliability with the higher plants data than with mam-mals and birds.

Biosphere Reserves include three zones: a core area or areas,a buffer zone or zones, and an outer transition area. Accordingto the Statutory Framework, the transition area does not haveto be clearly defined. Therefore, the area of the biospherereserves presented in this table may not correspond exactly tothe actual territory concerned.

Species traded within national borders and illegal trade inwildlife and wildlife products are not reflected in these figures.Illegal trade in wildlife products is estimated to be in the bil-lions of dollars annually. CITES trade data also do not reflectlegal trade between non-CITES members. In addition, data onmortality of individuals during capture or collection, transit, orquarantine are also not reflected in these numbers.

SOURCESProtected Areas (IUCN management categories, marineprotected areas): World Database on Protected Areas(WDPA), compiled by the World Database on Protected AreasConsortium, unpublished data (UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge,U.K., May, 2003). Ramsar Sites (Wetlands of InternationalImportance): Ramsar Convention Bureau, Gland, Switzerland.Available on-line at: http://ramsar.org/sitelist.pdf.Biosphere Reserves: United Nations Educational, Scientific,and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Man and the BiosphereProgramme, List of Biosphere Reserves available on-line at:http://www.unesco.org/mab/wnbr.htm. Known Species ofMammals, Plants, and Breeding Birds: World ConservationMonitoring Centre (WCMC) Species Database, unpublisheddata (WCMC, Cambridge, U.K., July, 2002). EndangeredSpecies of Mammals, Plants and Birds: IUCN Redlist avail-able on-line at http://www.redlist.org. International LegalNet Trade Reported by CITES: Convention on InternationalTrade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna (CITES)annual report data, World Conservation Monitoring Centre(WCMC) CITES Trade Database (WCMC, Cambridge, U.K.,July 2002).

257P a r t I I : D a t a T a b l e s

Data Table 6 continued

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (31)

Cumu- Nitrous(million (percent (metric (percent lative Methane Oxide metric change tons per change (million Road Public tons) since person) since metric tons) Resid- Trans- Electricity1999 1990) 1999 1990) 1800-2000 1995 1995 Industry ential portation and Heat 1990 1999 1990 1999

WORLD 23,172.2 8.9 3.9 (4.2) 1,017,359 6,340 3,570 4336.6 1802.1 4064.7 7424.4 689 582 .. ..ASIA (EXCL. MIDDLE EAST) 6,901.7 38.0 2.1 19.3 .. 2,562 1,177 1915.4 471.0 789.0 2446.9 616 540 543 422Armenia 3.0 .. 0.8 .. 290 a 2 1 1.1 0.0 0.1 1.5 .. 347 .. 384Azerbaijan 33.2 .. 4.2 .. 2,300 a 10 3 4.1 4.9 0.9 13.9 .. 1,756 .. 653Bangladesh 26.3 83.4 0.2 46.2 442 b 85 29 8.3 3.2 2.5 8.6 119 144 168 186Bhutan .. .. .. .. 4 1 0 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Cambodia .. .. .. .. 16 13 4 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..China 3,051.1 c 25.6 c 2.5 c 16.6 c 72,615 c 959 538 979.4 c 210.7 c 142.8 c 1247.1 c 1,355 c 700 c 1,249 c 442 cGeorgia 5.3 .. 1.0 .. 380 a 3 1 0.7 0.8 1.4 0.9 .. 376 .. 305India 903.8 52.9 0.9 31.9 20,275 655 257 205.5 56.2 119.3 399.1 446 417 517 360Indonesia 244.9 76.9 1.2 56.0 4,872 215 67 46.0 42.3 52.6 49.7 365 449 188 174Japan 1,158.5 10.5 9.1 7.7 36,577 d 61 30 260.6 71.2 224.0 314.4 396 391 234 259Kazakhstan 114.5 .. 7.0 .. 8,264 a 42 18 36.4 .. 4.1 55.2 .. 1,651 .. 1,360Korea, Dem People's Rep 214.3 (1.2) 9.7 (10.8) 6,114 e 10 8 158.4 0.7 9.1 32.3 .. .. .. ..Korea, Rep 410.4 75.5 8.8 62.2 7,120 e 27 12 75.7 24.8 59.3 94.3 546 578 385 247Kyrgyzstan 4.7 .. 1.0 .. 440 a 4 3 1.2 .. 0.7 1.7 .. 405 .. 391Lao People's Dem Rep .. .. .. .. 11 7 4 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Malaysia 101.3 90.4 4.6 55.7 1,832 f 24 12 24.0 2.3 29.3 27.7 552 578 362 321Mongolia .. .. .. .. 237 8 13 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Myanmar 9.0 122.2 0.2 90.0 257 50 16 1.3 0.8 3.2 2.7 41 54 102 90Nepal 3.0 234.4 0.1 225.0 32 34 6 1.1 0.8 0.7 0.0 49 107 80 171Pakistan 92.2 48.9 0.7 17.9 1,952 b 92 68 26.2 9.0 22.9 26.8 370 389 490 467Philippines 66.3 69.0 0.9 39.1 1,555 44 20 11.2 3.5 20.6 19.1 180 239 106 122Singapore 53.2 53.1 13.6 17.9 1,690 g 1 1 2.4 .. 5.8 27.4 803 643 130 82Sri Lanka 9.6 141.5 0.5 121.7 220 11 3 1.9 0.3 4.9 1.3 105 161 48 116Tajikistan 5.7 .. 0.9 .. 270 a 4 2 0.0 .. 3.1 0.7 .. 568 .. ..Thailand 155.8 95.5 2.5 73.1 2,535 73 24 35.4 3.9 46.3 49.6 335 445 159 250Turkmenistan 33.9 .. 7.3 .. 910 a 19 5 0.0 .. 1.5 8.7 .. 2,213 .. ..Uzbekistan 117.5 .. 4.8 .. 5,020 a 45 10 19.2 32.6 6.1 35.0 .. 2,241 .. 1,423Viet Nam 36.6 103.7 0.5 74.1 1,061 h 59 20 9.7 2.2 12.2 7.2 248 259 427 198EUROPE 5,892.3 .. 8.1 .. 411,552 1,164 607 1010.0 714.9 988.8 1816.4 .. 568 .. 320Albania 1.5 (77.4) 0.5 (76.6) 198 2 2 0.4 0.2 0.6 0.1 667 146 585 138Austria 60.5 6.1 7.5 1.5 4,099 8 7 13.9 8.2 16.6 9.3 365 319 250 214Belarus 57.1 .. 5.6 .. 3,457 a 17 11 7.7 4.3 5.4 22.3 .. 853 .. 255Belgium 118.7 11.8 11.6 8.9 10,569 10 12 32.0 20.3 23.3 21.2 517 487 440 466Bosnia and Herzegovina 5.3 .. 1.4 .. 185 i 1 1 0.2 .. 0.8 2.6 .. .. .. ..Bulgaria 43.8 (42.5) 5.4 (37.7) 3,144 7 9 9.7 1.4 5.2 22.2 1,545 1,147 501 924Croatia 19.0 .. 4.1 .. 576 i 3 3 3.7 2.1 4.1 4.5 .. .. .. ..Czech Rep 110.6 (26.5) 10.8 (26.3) 10,139 j 16 8 25.0 7.1 10.6 51.8 1,122 860 857 458Denmark 53.3 k 7.2 k 10.0 k 3.9 k 3,342 6 8 5.1 k 4.7 k 11.4 k 24.8 k 457 k 401 k 170 k 128 kEstonia 14.7 .. 10.4 .. 349 a 2 1 1.0 0.5 1.2 10.7 .. 1,294 .. 315Finland 57.8 8.4 11.2 4.8 2,001 7 6 14.0 3.9 11.2 18.0 536 495 437 349France 361.4 l (0.7) l 6.1 l (4.5) l 30,997 l 50 90 79.4 l 58.6 l 128.1 l 25.1 l 320 l 276 l 227 l 224 lGermany 821.7 m (15.0) m 10.0 m (17.7) m 75,606 93 78 128.7 m 118.9 m 173.8 m 274.4 m 599 m 444 m 282 m 218 mGreece 81.5 18.2 7.7 13.4 2,390 6 14 9.6 7.0 15.8 41.6 565 556 297 253Hungary 57.9 (14.4) 5.8 (11.4) 3,920 12 7 7.4 8.8 8.7 26.2 647 538 392 ..Iceland 2.1 3.0 7.4 (5.2) 88 0 0 0.6 0.0 0.6 0.0 345 294 261 ..Ireland 39.9 24.1 10.6 15.8 1,269 12 14 4.9 5.8 9.1 15.2 620 430 259 143Italy 420.5 6.0 7.3 4.4 16,337 e 40 33 79.0 72.4 110.9 97.1 366 342 231 217Latvia 6.8 .. 2.8 .. 470 a 2 1 1.2 0.3 1.7 2.7 .. 481 .. 291Lithuania 13.0 .. 3.5 .. 889 a 4 2 1.9 0.6 3.2 4.8 .. 560 .. 251Macedonia, FYR 10.0 4.7 5.0 (1.0) 300 i 1 1 0.9 0.3 1.1 6.2 .. .. .. ..Moldova, Rep 6.6 .. 1.5 .. 590 a 4 2 0.8 0.8 0.4 2.8 .. 754 .. 445Netherlands 166.6 n 6.4 n 10.5 n 0.8 n 9,404 18 17 34.8 n 18.9 n 28.7 n 46.8 n 529 n 442 n 387 n 337 nNorway 37.1 30.5 8.3 24.3 1,717 10 3 6.9 0.9 9.8 0.2 336 323 203 164Poland 310.0 (11.0) 8.0 (12.3) 20,764 83 32 48.1 32.3 29.0 151.5 1,432 926 351 389Portugal 61.1 o 53.1 o 6.1 o 51.6 o 1,509 8 7 12.4 o 2.1 o 15.8 o 21.4 o 319 o 390 o 235 o 237 oRomania 86.6 (49.5) 3.9 (47.9) 6,440 29 17 18.9 6.1 7.4 35.7 1,059 666 734 389Russian Federation 1,486.3 .. 10.2 .. 86,705 a 498 64 192.4 146.1 101.0 495.5 .. 1,482 .. 530Serbia and Montenegro 41.9 (30.3) 4.0 (33.0) 2,390 j 10 7 7.4 0.1 4.2 26.1 .. .. .. ..Slovakia 39.4 (28.9) 7.3 (30.7) 3,644 i 6 3 14.4 3.6 4.1 10.2 1,096 718 844 818Slovenia 15.0 17.0 7.5 12.9 455 2 1 2.2 1.8 3.8 5.7 .. .. .. ..Spain 272.0 p 28.6 p 6.8 p 26.6 p 9,151 31 36 47.7 p 16.2 p 77.5 p 76.9 p 379 p 395 p 236 p 223 pSweden 48.2 (0.6) 5.4 (3.9) 4,058 8 7 10.4 3.6 20.0 7.1 283 246 197 ..Switzerland 39.9 q (3.1) q 5.6 q (7.7) q 2,262 5 3 6.1 q 12.0 q 14.7 q 0.2 q 227 q 208 q .. q .. qUkraine 379.0 .. 7.6 .. 22,729 a 101 33 105.8 61.8 10.1 110.4 .. 2,329 .. 1,726United Kingdom 535.3 (6.5) 9.0 (9.2) 68,803 52 66 74.4 81.6 114.4 143.5 567 440 226 205MIDDLE EAST & N. AFRICA 1,339.2 45.0 3.6 19.7 .. 289 186 299.5 118.5 233.7 395.5 655 721 374 ..Afghanistan .. .. .. .. 82 11 7 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Algeria 68.2 19.8 2.3 0.4 2,178 20 9 7.0 9.6 6.2 16.4 444 463 77 63Egypt 110.3 33.7 1.7 13.0 2,682 27 19 29.4 11.3 16.6 32.9 580 529 612 448Iran, Islamic Rep 263.2 45.6 3.8 23.0 6,664 67 53 58.4 45.5 66.4 62.1 765 783 647 762Iraq 81.1 47.7 3.6 14.5 1,985 9 6 17.2 6.4 25.9 16.2 1,178 2,816 .. ..Israel 55.9 58.2 9.5 20.8 1,203 1 2 6.0 1.9 9.5 30.9 510 517 .. ..Jordan 13.4 43.1 2.8 (2.8) 286 1 1 2.0 1.7 3.3 4.9 824 744 409 427Kuwait 46.5 122.0 25.2 157.4 1,268 7 0 15.1 3.0 6.0 21.2 1,174 1,960 796 ..Lebanon 15.6 143.6 4.5 92.8 326 1 1 2.9 1.9 4.2 6.7 717 875 .. 729Libyan Arab Jamahiriya 41.4 52.6 8.0 27.0 1,062 9 2 4.9 2.2 10.1 12.7 880 1,550 .. ..Morocco 28.0 49.9 1.0 26.7 703 9 14 5.4 3.3 1.3 9.0 243 298 157 177Oman 21.1 104.3 8.6 48.3 307 2 1 5.7 0.2 2.5 6.3 376 519 156 ..Saudi Arabia 216.6 35.1 11.0 5.9 5,836 51 9 41.6 3.3 29.7 57.1 923 1,031 277 ..Syrian Arab Rep 48.1 49.8 3.0 17.4 898 6 8 9.7 2.3 3.7 11.2 1,051 938 413 626Tunisia 16.7 31.3 1.8 14.1 416 4 5 3.8 1.7 3.8 5.1 350 303 308 245Turkey 182.8 32.2 2.8 13.0 4,137 25 41 43.3 22.1 29.9 56.8 466 467 320 397United Arab Emirates 67.1 59.8 26.2 25.8 2,047 26 1 30.0 0.3 5.4 28.3 1,014 1,347 837 ..Yemen 8.6 17.9 0.5 (22.6) 295 r 6 5 0.5 1.6 3.9 1.3 734 664 199 97

(million metric tonsCO2 equivalent) Sectors

Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Emissions of

(million metric tons), 1999Total Per Capita

CO2 Emissions by EconomicSector

Carbon Intensity:CO2 Emissions per GDP (PPP)(tons CO2 per million $ intl)

SectorAll Economic Industry

Data Table 7 Climate and AtmosphereSources: Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC), International Energy Agency (IEA), Netherlands Institute forPublic Health (RIVM)

258W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 2 – 2 0 0 4

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (32)

Cumu- Nitrous(million (percent (metric (percent lative Methane Oxide metric change tons per change (million Road Public tons) since person) since metric tons) Resid- Trans- Electricity1999 1990) 1999 1990) 1800-2000 1995 1995 Industry ential portation and Heat 1990 1999 1990 1999

SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA .. .. .. .. 17,665 488 378 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Angola 4.8 11.6 0.4 (17.8) 219 14 5 1.6 0.3 1.2 0.4 410 428 401 185Benin 1.2 391.7 0.2 280.0 19 3 2 0.2 0.3 0.8 0.0 54 216 62 193Botswana .. .. .. .. 54 6 4 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Burkina Faso .. .. .. .. 16 8 11 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Burundi .. .. .. .. 6 2 1 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Cameroon 2.6 (5.5) 0.2 (26.1) 143 11 9 0.2 0.6 1.6 0.0 131 115 36 44Central African Rep .. .. .. .. 8 6 5 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Chad .. .. .. .. 7 9 8 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Congo 0.4 (53.2) 0.1 (65.7) 50 3 1 0.0 0.0 0.3 .. 321 164 59 ..Congo, Dem Rep 2.5 (41.0) 0.0 (63.6) 178 29 20 0.7 0.3 0.5 0.0 74 78 56 ..Côte d'Ivoire 4.7 52.8 0.3 20.8 156 6 3 0.7 0.4 1.3 3.3 162 184 130 112Equatorial Guinea .. .. .. .. 14 0 0 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Eritrea 0.6 .. 0.2 .. 9 2 1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 .. 181 .. 52Ethiopia 2.9 22.1 0.0 (20.0) 81 42 53 0.8 0.5 1.6 0.0 86 76 170 186Gabon 1.5 30.7 1.2 2.5 161 .. .. 0.4 0.1 0.5 0.3 190 209 80 132Gambia .. .. .. .. 5 1 0 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Ghana 4.4 67.6 0.2 35.3 127 6 7 0.5 0.6 1.9 1.0 112 129 123 53Guinea .. .. .. .. 40 5 2 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Guinea-Bissau .. .. .. .. 6 1 1 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Kenya 7.7 17.2 0.3 (7.4) 239 20 20 1.5 0.5 2.2 1.1 259 260 297 288Lesotho .. .. .. .. 3 1 1 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Liberia .. .. .. .. 42 1 1 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Madagascar .. .. .. .. 45 17 10 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Malawi .. .. .. .. 27 s 3 2 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Mali .. .. .. .. 15 11 12 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Mauritania .. .. .. .. 46 4 6 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Mozambique 1.1 7.0 0.1 (28.6) 102 10 3 0.1 0.1 0.8 0.0 115 76 88 26Namibia 2.2 .. 1.3 .. 16 4 4 0.2 .. 1.1 0.0 .. 252 .. 12Niger .. .. .. .. 25 6 4 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Nigeria 38.4 0.4 0.3 (22.7) 2,276 70 33 9.3 3.0 15.7 5.9 480 387 160 265Rwanda .. .. .. .. 14 t 2 1 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Senegal 3.3 49.8 0.4 20.7 99 6 8 0.6 0.3 1.0 1.2 225 255 131 182Sierra Leone .. .. .. .. 30 2 1 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Somalia .. .. .. .. 26 17 22 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..South Africa 346.3 19.0 8.1 1.3 12,162 54 24 60.6 5.9 33.4 167.8 916 960 521 508Sudan 5.4 (1.5) 0.2 (22.7) 166 42 42 0.7 0.2 3.5 0.9 589 316 .. 266Tanzania, United Rep 2.2 7.8 0.1 (14.3) 94 29 24 0.4 0.3 0.8 0.1 143 120 154 138Togo 0.9 63.0 0.2 33.3 24 2 2 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.1 91 143 129 256Uganda .. .. .. .. 38 10 8 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Zambia 1.9 (22.9) 0.2 (40.0) 167 s 10 5 0.8 .. 0.6 .. 352 259 318 387Zimbabwe 13.7 (6.0) 1.1 (22.0) 586 10 8 2.4 0.1 2.0 5.3 562 425 545 311NORTH AMERICA 6,074.0 15.3 19.5 4.8 .. 958 535 645.6 392.2 1528.2 2124.2 738 649 .. ..Canada 489.2 16.1 16.0 5.5 22,363 123 62 89.8 40.4 115.3 113.4 683 635 366 ..United States 5,584.8 15.2 19.9 4.7 301,279 835 473 555.8 351.8 1412.9 2010.9 743 650 .. ..C. AMERICA & CARIBBEAN 464.3 22.1 2.8 4.1 13,376 149 105 90.6 26.5 122.8 127.7 497 463 404 300Belize .. .. .. .. 9 0 0 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Costa Rica 4.7 67.3 1.2 29.3 110 3 3 0.8 0.1 3.0 0.1 161 169 139 80Cuba 28.4 (10.7) 2.5 (14.8) 1,179 9 9 11.9 0.9 2.1 11.2 834 906 .. 760Dominican Rep 17.8 91.1 2.2 64.1 284 6 4 1.4 2.5 5.6 3.5 342 396 93 94El Salvador 5.3 126.9 0.9 91.1 107 3 2 1.1 0.4 2.6 1.0 138 208 119 150Guatemala 8.3 126.7 0.8 82.9 173 6 5 1.4 0.5 3.7 0.8 136 212 147 171Haiti 1.4 46.8 0.2 30.8 33 3 3 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.3 72 127 78 176Honduras 4.3 97.7 0.7 54.5 93 5 3 1.2 0.1 1.9 0.8 194 290 258 246Jamaica 10.1 26.6 3.9 17.3 282 1 1 0.8 0.4 1.4 2.2 890 1,112 159 275Mexico 358.2 20.6 3.7 3.1 9,930 98 64 62.7 20.4 96.2 101.3 516 472 440 271Nicaragua 3.4 94.8 0.7 51.1 85 5 4 0.4 0.1 1.3 1.2 186 282 144 80Panama 4.8 77.5 1.7 51.3 179 3 3 0.9 0.2 1.9 1.2 264 311 328 357Trinidad and Tobago 15.6 27.6 12.1 20.4 699 3 0 7.2 0.1 1.6 3.7 1,494 1,489 1,251 1,679SOUTH AMERICA 744.9 41.3 2.2 22.5 .. 588 433 183.2 52.2 235.8 86.2 310 330 195 276Argentina 142.7 36.9 3.9 21.9 4,895 87 67 20.4 16.9 37.0 25.1 385 335 169 174Bolivia 9.8 85.0 1.2 50.0 190 16 15 1.1 0.9 3.0 1.8 404 526 225 304Brazil 305.6 52.0 1.8 34.1 8,140 302 244 87.2 17.0 109.9 17.5 222 271 158 267Chile 59.0 92.4 3.9 68.2 1,457 16 9 11.4 3.4 14.6 16.4 431 465 207 242Colombia 56.5 15.8 1.4 (2.2) 1,854 54 21 19.3 3.4 18.3 4.4 268 245 175 294Ecuador 19.3 44.3 1.6 19.2 490 14 10 2.6 1.8 5.5 2.4 440 544 186 196Guyana .. .. .. .. 57 1 1 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Paraguay 4.0 101.5 0.7 60.9 69 12 10 0.3 0.2 3.4 .. 108 179 34 48Peru 21.2 18.4 0.8 1.2 984 19 15 6.6 2.8 8.8 2.3 229 188 162 214Suriname .. .. .. .. 62 1 0 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Uruguay 6.8 73.8 2.0 63.2 254 17 16 1.1 0.5 2.7 1.3 187 240 98 143Venezuela 120.0 19.9 5.1 (1.4) 4,475 49 23 33.2 5.2 32.6 15.1 920 946 538 720OCEANIA .. .. .. .. 11,839 133 139 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Australia 321.6 23.8 17.0 10.4 10,524 101 95 50.5 6.7 63.9 166.3 779 687 420 352Fiji .. .. .. .. .. 1 1 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..New Zealand 30.6 33.1 8.2 19.5 1,229 26 31 7.9 0.5 6.7 4.7 429 449 409 ..Papua New Guinea .. .. .. .. 68 3 2 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Solomon Islands .. .. .. .. 4 0 0 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..DEVELOPED 14,196.7 .. 10.8 .. .. 2,494 1,367 2103.8 1231.6 2872.4 4742.2 .. 594 .. ..DEVELOPING 8,020.2 37.2 1.8 18.2 197,323 3,836 2,192 2180.8 564.4 1167.5 2613.3 628 532 561 413a. Emissions for the Former Soviet Union countries prior to 1992 are estimates. b. Emissions prior to 1972 are estimates. c. China includes the People's Republic of China and Hong Kong but excludes Taiwan. d. Includes the Ruyukui Islands only after 1949. e. Emissions prior to 1945 are estimates. f. Emissions from 1890-1949 and 1957-1969 are for Peninsular Malaysia. g. Estimatesfrom 1950-1956 are derived from figures for the Federation of Malaya Singapore. h. Emissions prior to 1970 are estimates. i. Emissions for Former Yugoslav Republics before 1992 are estimates.j. Emissions for countries of the former Czechoslovakia prior to 1992 are estimates. k. Denmark excludes Greenland and the Danish Faroes. l. France includes Monaco, and excludes overseas departments (French Polynesia, Guadeloupe, Martinique, and La Réunion). m. Germany includes the new federal states of Germany from 1970 and Western Germany only from 1960 to 1969. n. The Netherlands excludes Suriname and the Netherlands Antilles. o. Portugal includes the Azores and Madeira. p. Spain includes the Canary Islands. q. Switzerland includes Liechtenstein.r. Emissions prior to 1980 are estimates. s. Emissions from 1950 to 1963 are estimates derived from figures for Rhodesia-Nyasaland. t. 1950-61 data includes Rwanda-Urundi.

Total Per CapitaCarbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Emissions of

(million metric tons), 1999 (tons CO2 per million $ intl)

CO2 Emissions by Economic Carbon Intensity:CO2 Emissions per GDP (PPP)Sector

All Economic Industry CO2 equivalent) Sectors Sector

(million metric tons

259P a r t I I : D a t a T a b l e s

Data Table 7 continuedMore data tables are available. Log on to http://earthtrends.wri.org/datatables/climate or send an e-mail [emailprotected] with “Instructions” in the message body.

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (33)

VARIABLE DEFINITIONS AND METHODOLOGYTotal Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions and Per Capita CO2Emissions include the total and the average emissions of car-bon dioxide per person, respectively, from combustion of allfossil fuels used by a country.

The CO2 emissions presented here are based on the Interna-tional Energy Agency’s (IEA) energy data gathered and recti-fied for their Energy Balances of Organization for EconomicCooperation and Development (OECD) Countries and EnergyBalances of non-OECD Countries databases (please see thenotes for the Energy and Resource Use table in this book formore information on how these data are gathered andadjusted). Methods and emissions factors are spelled out in theRevised 1996 International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories availableat http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/gl/invs1.htm.The IPCC allows countries to use either the reference or thesectoral approach when reporting their emissions. The figuresprovided here are based on the reference approach, which cal-culates emissions using data on a country’s energy supply, andcaptures refining, flaring, and other “fugitive emissions” thatdo not result directly from end-use fossil fuel combustion. Incontrast, the sectoral approach estimates emissions based onthe combustion rather than the supply of fossil fuels.

The reference approach accounts for the carbon in fuels sup-plied to the economy. Apparent consumption of fuels is calcu-lated as production minus exports plus imports. Net stockchanges are either added or subtracted. International marineand aviation bunkers (fuels used for international transport)are subtracted from the national total as well, as these figuresare accounted for separately. The production of secondary fuelsis not accounted for, because the carbon contained in thosefuels is already included in the primary fuel. However, importsand exports of secondary fuels are included in the calculations.Stored carbon from fuels used for non-energy purposes is sub-tracted from the total carbon emissions. Emissions from bio-mass fuels are not included in these estimates because theIPCC assumes that such emissions are equal to sequestrationduring regrowth.

Cumulative CO2 Contribution, 1800–2000 consists of thesum of CO2 produced during consumption of solid, liquid, andgaseous fuels; gas flaring; and cement manufacture from 1800to the year 2000. The variable does not include emissions fromland use change, or from bunker fuels used in internationaltransportation.

WRI calculates cumulative CO2 emissions levels based onthe Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center’s (CDIAC)emissions data from 1800 to 1980, and on Energy InformationAdministration (EIA) data from 1980 to 2000. CDIAC and EIAboth report CO2 emissions as the weight of the elemental car-bon portion of CO2; WRI converted the values to the actualmass of CO2 by multiplying the carbon mass by 3.664 (the ratioof the mass of CO2 to that of carbon). CDIAC bases CO2 emis-sions from before 1950 on several compilations of fossil fuelproduction and trade: World Energy Production 1800–1985 byEtemad et al. and four regional volumes of International Histori-cal Statistics authored by B.R. Mitchell. Emissions and esti-mates from 1950 to the present are derived primarily fromenergy statistics published by the United Nations in their“Energy Statistics Yearbook.” U.N. gas flaring estimates aresupplemented with data from the U.S. Energy InformationAdministration, G. Marland at CDIAC, and a 1974 paperauthored by R.M. Rotty entitled “First estimates of global flar-ing of natural gas.” Emissions are calculated from data on fuelproduction, trade, and net apparent consumption by CDIAC.More information on the data, methodology, and sources usedcan be found at: http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/trends/emis/meth_reg.htm. A complete record of the formulas and

assumptions used to calculate CO2 emissions is available on-line at http://cdiac. esd.ornl.gov/trends/emis/factors.htm.

Methane and Nitrous Oxide emissions include emissions, inmillion metric tons of CO2 equivalent, from energy, agriculture,waste, and other sources. Energy emissions from energy com-prise the production, handling, transmission, and combustion offossil and biofuels (IPCC categories 1A and 1B). Agriculturecomprises animals, animal wastes, rice production, agriculturalwaste burning not intended for energy production, and savannaburning (IPCC category 4). Waste includes emissions fromlandfills, wastewater treatment and disposal, and waste incin-eration not intended for energy production (IPCC category 6).Other sources include industrial process emissions, and tropi-cal and temperate forest fires (IPCC categories 2 and 5).

The Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research(EDGAR) uses activity data taken from international statisticaldata to estimate emissions of the individual gases reported bythe database. Activity data were multiplied by emissions fac-tors specific to that activity. The emissions factors were prima-rily from Olivier et al. (1999), “Sectoral emission inventories ofgreenhouse gases for 1990 on a per country basis as well as on1o x 1o.” Various factors were taken from other international andnational-level sources. For more information, please see:http://www.rivm.nl/env/int/coredata/edgar/v2/index.html.

CO2 Emissions by Economic Sector represents total CO2emissions from fossil fuel burning by individual economic sec-tors. It is important to note that emissions from electricity gen-eration are not distributed to end users, but are treated in anindependent sector. Industry represents CO2 emissions frommanufacturing industries and construction. Carbon dioxideemissions from residential sources include emissions fromcombustion of all fossil fuel types in households but excludestransportation. Road transportation refers to emissions fromall road vehicles and agricultural vehicles while they are onhighways. Emissions from public electricity and heat produc-tion include the sum of emissions from combustion of all fossilfuel types used for public electricity generation, public com-bined heat and power generation, and public heat plants. Emis-sions from electricity and heat production for use by the pro-ducer (autoproduction) are not included in this variable.

These data are produced by IEA in the same manner asdescribed above under Total Carbon Dioxide Emissions.

Carbon Intensity: All Economic Sectors is the amount ofCO2 emitted per amount of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) inPurchasing Power Parity (PPP) terms generated by the coun-try’s economy. This measure provides an indicator of how effi-ciently a country performs, in carbon emission terms, relativeto its wealth generation. Please see the notes after the Eco-nomic Indicators data table for more information on GDP PPP.

WRI calculated CO2 emissions per GDP PPP using datafrom IEA. Total energy consumption in each country wasdivided by total GDP PPP in constant dollar terms.

Carbon Intensity: Industry Sector is the amount of CO2emitted by the sector per amount of income generated. Theindustry sector is defined as including International StandardIndustrial Classification (ISIC) divisions 15–37 (please seehttp://unstats.un.org/unsd/cr/registry/regcst.asp?Cl=17for more information on ISIC classifications). This measureprovides an indicator of how efficiently, in greenhouse gasemissions terms, a country’s industrial sector is able to gener-ate wealth.

Industrial carbon intensity was calculated as follows: Indus-trial CO2 emissions were divided by the amount of GDP PPPgenerated by the industry sector. Industrial GDP, as defined bythe World Bank, includes ISIC divisions 15–37. WRI adjusted

260W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 2 – 2 0 0 4

Data Table 7 continued

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (34)

IEA’s value for industrial CO2 emissions by subtracting emis-sions from mining and quarrying (ISIC Divisions 13–14) andconstruction (ISIC division 45) from IEA’s total industrial CO2emissions figure. The only differences remaining after thisadjustment are that the World Bank definition includes emis-sions from the manufacture of coke, petroleum products, andother derived fossil fuels (ISIC division 23), manufacture ofcoke oven products (ISIC group 231), manufacture of refinedpetroleum products (ISIC group 232), and processing of nuclearfuels. According to the IEA, however, the energy consumed forthese activities, and therefore the CO2 emissions, are capturedin the energy contained in the original fuels used for theseprocesses. The differences remaining between the World Bankand IEA definitions of the industry and manufacturing sectorshould therefore be small. After the definitions for industrialCO2 emissions and the percentage of GDP generated by indus-try were brought into agreement, industrial GDP PPP was cal-culated by dividing total GDP PPP by the percentage gener-ated by industry, and industrial CO2 emissions was divided bythis value.

FREQUENCY OF UPDATE BY DATA PROVIDERSThe IEA, World Bank, CDIAC, and IEA update their data annu-ally. The National Institute for Public Health and the Environ-ment (RIVM) calculates emissions of methane and nitrousoxide periodically. The UN Population Division updates popula-tion data every other year.

DATA RELIABILITY AND CAUTIONARY NOTESCO2 Emissions Data: The IEA CO2 emissions data are basedon well-established and institutionalized accounting method-ologies and undergo thorough review and adjustments. The ref-erence and sectoral approaches will, in most cases, give verysimilar results. However, because the reference approach iscalculated using energy supply, it can lead to slight overesti-mates. For some countries, especially developing countries,statistical differences in basic data or unexplained differencesin the two approaches can lead to significant discrepancies.Individual countries may use different energy figures than theIEA or treat bunker fuels differently. Countries may use spe-cific calorific values, instead of the averages used by IEA.Also, military emissions may be treated differently by the IEA.As a result, the data shown here can differ from the numbersreported by a country to the IPCC.

Cumulative CO2 contribution since 1900: The share of car-bon emissions for recently formed countries such as the inde-pendent republics of the former Soviet Union is estimatedbased on each country’s CO2 emissions in the years immedi-ately following its formation. For example, Kazakhstan wasformed in 1992. Total 1992–1996 emissions for the former SovietUnion were 3,802,544 tons; Kazakhstan’s emissions from1992–1996 were 6.3% of this total. It is then assumed that Kaza-khstan produced roughly 6.3% of the carbon emitted in the for-mer Soviet Union each year before 1992. As a result, total con-tributions from the former Soviet republics, the former Yugoslavrepublics, and other newly formed countries should be takenonly as rough approximations.

Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions: The methane andnitrous oxide emissions data are calculated using a standard-ized methodology and reviewed for accuracy by the United

Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).The data can therefore be used with considerable confidence intheir accuracy.

Carbon Intensity Indicators: While CO2 emissions per GDPPPP is a useful indicator of greenhouse gas efficiency at thescale of the entire economy, it does not necessarily indicatehow efficient the individual elements that make up the economyare. For example, it does not differentiate between economiesthat are more focused on industry as opposed to services,which generally require less energy and generate compara-tively more income than industry. Interpretation of between-country comparisons should therefore be made with care. Inaddition, a number of countries, particularly rapidly-developingcountries, over-report their GDP and GDP growth rate, whichmakes them appear more efficient than they actually are. Giventhe close match achieved between the World Bank and IEA’sdefinitions when calculating the industrial sector indicator,the results of WRI’s calculation can serve as an acceptableindicator of how efficiently, in terms of greenhouse gas emis-sions, the industry sector is able to generate economic goods.However, this match is not perfect and could lead to slight dis-tortions in some countries. In addition, while focusing in on theindustry sector reduces the potential for mismatched compar-isons as discussed above, industries in different countries canhave different foci. Between-country comparisons should there-fore be made with care.

SOURCESCarbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Variables: InternationalEnergy Agency (IEA), 2001. CO2 Emissions from Fossil FuelCombustion (2001 Edition). Paris: Organization for EconomicCooperation and Development (OECD). Electronic databaseavailable on-line at: http://data.iea.org/ieastore/default.asp. Cumulative CO2 Emissions Since 1900: Carbon DioxideInformation Analysis Center (CDIAC), Environmental SciencesDivision, Oak Ridge National Laboratory: 2001. Global, Regional,and National CO2 Emission Estimates from Fossil Fuel Burning,Cement Production, and Gas Flaring: 1751–1998, NDP-030. OakRidge, Tennessee: CDIAC. Available on-line at http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/ftp/ndp030/. Energy Information Administrationof the U.S. Department of Energy: 2001. Carbon Dioxide Emis-sions from Use of Fossil Fuels, International Energy Annual,2000. Washington, DC: EIA. Available on-line at http://www.eia.doe.gov/iea/carbon.html. Methane and Nitrous OxideEmissions: National Institute for Public Health (RIVM) andNetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research(TNO). 2001. The Emission Database for Global AtmosphereicResearch (EDGAR) 3.2: The Netherlands: RIVM. Databaseavailable on-line at http://www.rivm.nl/env/int/coredata/edgar/index.html. Carbon Intensity Indicators: Interna-tional Energy Agency (IEA), 2001. CO2 Emissions from FossilFuel Combustion (2001 Edition). Paris: Organisation for Eco-nomic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Electronicdatabase available on-line at: http://data.iea.org/ieastore/default.asp. Development Data Group, The World Bank. 2002.World Development Indicators 2002 online. Washington, DC: TheWorld Bank. Available on-line at http://www.worldbank.org/data/onlinedbs/onlinedbases.htm. Population (used to cal-culate per capita values): Population Division of the Depart-ment of Economic and Social Affairs of the United NationsSecretariat, 2002. World Population Prospects: The 2000 Revi-sion. New York: United Nations. Data set available on CD-ROM.

261P a r t I I : D a t a T a b l e s

Data Table 7 continued

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (35)

ElectricityTotal Cons-

(1000 Percent Per Fossil Hydro- Mod- Tradi- umptionmetric Change Capita Fuels Nuclear electric ern {b} tional {c} consumption), 1999 per Capita

toe) {d} Since (kgoe) {e} (kgoe) {e}1999 1989 1999 1999 1999 1999 1999 1999 portation 1999

WORLD 9,702,786 12.7 1,623 7,689,047 661,901 222,223 62,750 1,035,139 244 167 309 22 18 174ASIA (EXCL. MIDDLE EAST) 2,919,333 43.1 867 2,175,366 117,291 44,424 16,892 561,751 221 144 219 26 12 78Armenia 1,845 .. 487 1,220 542 103 0 1 213 165 45 26 3 83Azerbaijan 12,574 .. 1,575 12,376 0 130 0 4 665 300 404 15 5 151Bangladesh 17,935 44.4 133 10,395 0 72 0 7,469 98 84 65 21 7 7Bhutan .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Cambodia .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..China {f} 1,088,349 29.2 861 854,743 3,896 17,527 1,234 211,705 241 141 233 29 6 65Georgia 2,573 .. 487 1,944 0 554 0 70 183 144 114 13 21 107India 480,418 38.1 484 271,806 3,409 7,004 89 198,018 222 172 202 20 9 33Indonesia 136,121 57.3 650 86,325 0 806 2,346 46,748 250 77 299 14 15 29Japan 515,447 23.6 4,064 416,131 82,512 7,432 3,993 4,332 174 137 391 26 18 639Kazakhstan 35,439 .. 2,180 34,581 0 527 0 73 511 395 29 30 7 193Korea, Dem People's Rep 58,925 1.2 2,665 56,108 0 1,815 0 1,001 .. .. 11 67 5 20Korea, Rep 181,365 128.2 3,908 151,848 26,859 358 119 151 255 180 293 30 15 448Kyrgyzstan 2,451 .. 506 1,567 0 1,044 0 4 211 136 34 17 12 130Lao People's Dem Rep .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Malaysia 42,650 109.3 1,957 39,551 0 647 0 2,470 243 151 144 26 27 222Mongolia .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Myanmar 12,897 17.9 274 3,328 0 65 0 9,504 77 .. 196 7 9 6Nepal 8,051 37.1 358 1,002 0 98 0 6,937 287 72 316 5 3 4Pakistan 59,830 43.6 435 34,363 74 1,931 0 23,462 253 236 188 22 14 27Philippines 40,728 49.5 549 21,580 0 674 9,111 9,363 147 85 72 19 21 39Singapore 22,693 130.5 5,791 22,629 0 0 0 0 274 139 121 18 19 576Sri Lanka 7,728 41.7 412 3,181 0 359 0 4,189 130 104 178 22 24 22Tajikistan 3,344 .. 555 2,033 0 1,327 0 0 333 190 42 14 32 190Thailand 70,415 85.3 1,136 56,128 0 278 0 13,844 201 132 129 26 26 113Turkmenistan 13,644 .. 2,943 13,764 0 0 0 0 891 21 19 1 4 89Uzbekistan 49,383 .. 2,017 48,613 0 489 0 0 942 704 595 19 8 141Viet Nam 35,209 48.1 457 11,684 0 1,185 0 22,340 249 68 300 9 13 22EUROPE 2,559,701 .. 3,516 2,117,484 303,885 60,847 8,471 56,374 243 176 653 22 18 400Albania 1,052 (63.5) 336 511 0 451 0 60 102 54 81 14 20 73Austria 28,432 18.0 3,516 21,804 0 3,482 105 2,957 150 92 756 21 23 532Belarus 23,895 .. 2,337 22,484 0 2 0 794 357 253 593 30 10 228Belgium 58,642 21.2 5,731 44,995 12,774 29 25 349 241 232 937 27 17 626Bosnia and Herzegovina 2,008 .. 522 1,676 0 138 0 175 .. .. 45 3 21 47Bulgaria 18,203 (41.0) 2,264 13,610 4,128 237 0 406 477 404 271 24 11 255Croatia 8,156 .. 1,753 7,053 0 567 0 278 .. .. 370 23 19 216Czech Rep 38,584 (21.8) 3,751 34,549 3,481 144 41 473 300 190 535 27 11 402Denmark {g} 20,070 13.4 3,783 18,391 0 3 333 843 151 76 822 14 25 520Estonia 4,557 .. 3,231 4,101 0 0 3 505 401 213 713 14 11 290Finland 33,372 13.9 6,463 19,038 5,987 1,099 22 6,124 286 301 .. 35 14 1,236France 255,043 14.8 4,321 139,942 102,742 6,227 561 9,440 194 133 674 18 20 546Germany 337,196 (6.4) 4,111 286,465 44,304 1,671 715 1,361 182 119 774 21 20 490Greece 26,894 23.8 2,539 25,370 0 395 141 911 183 116 406 16 28 330Hungary 25,289 (16.5) 2,524 21,116 3,674 16 2 332 235 .. 538 17 13 248Iceland 3,173 57.2 11,452 899 0 520 1,753 0 444 .. 2,114 20 11 1,991Ireland 13,979 43.9 3,715 13,702 0 73 53 131 151 73 647 18 27 430Italy 169,041 12.0 2,938 156,777 0 3,901 2,926 1,477 137 115 617 25 25 391Latvia 3,822 .. 1,569 2,504 0 237 0 913 270 183 444 19 19 158Lithuania 7,909 .. 2,137 4,885 2,627 36 0 591 340 163 383 16 15 152Macedonia, FYR 3,058 .. 1,512 2,736 0 119 31 180 .. .. 248 16 13 218Moldova, Rep 2,813 .. 653 2,613 0 7 0 59 321 209 150 13 7 53Netherlands {h} 74,068 13.7 4,690 70,145 999 8 189 267 196 186 654 26 19 516Norway 26,606 22.3 5,980 14,862 0 10,398 6 1,343 232 178 854 28 19 2,090Poland 93,382 (23.2) 2,417 89,664 0 185 26 3,541 279 159 503 21 12 206Portugal {i} 23,627 47.2 2,364 21,761 0 626 99 1,158 151 136 208 29 26 311Romania 36,432 (47.3) 1,621 30,734 1,362 1,573 18 2,816 280 195 389 26 9 130Russian Federation 602,952 .. 4,124 550,704 32,120 13,802 24 4,972 601 378 929 23 14 349Serbia and Montenegro 13,375 .. 1,266 11,862 0 1,150 0 210 .. .. 130 20 12 242Slovakia 17,991 (20.4) 3,335 14,095 3,418 390 0 76 328 333 434 33 8 363Slovenia {j} 6,506 .. 3,268 4,838 1,224 322 7 230 .. .. 558 20 21 448Spain 118,467 32.9 2,970 96,314 15,337 1,966 377 3,605 172 123 298 22 28 382Sweden 51,094 8.9 5,773 17,513 19,073 6,157 67 8,084 261 .. 903 25 16 1,217Switzerland {k} 26,689 14.3 3,722 15,761 6,753 3,440 174 493 139 .. 820 16 26 624Ukraine 148,389 .. 2,966 128,625 18,790 1,008 0 262 912 627 518 26 5 198United Kingdom 230,324 8.8 3,886 201,296 25,091 460 773 944 189 117 716 18 22 465MIDDLE EAST & N. AFRICA 518,436 46.1 1,302 500,461 0 5,694 963 10,976 279 167 194 23 17 129Afghanistan .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Algeria 28,280 27.8 950 28,147 0 60 0 76 192 36 165 13 12 50Egypt 44,490 44.7 667 41,893 0 1,315 0 1,282 214 185 100 27 14 73Iran, Islamic Rep 103,635 68.4 1,497 102,422 0 427 0 786 308 317 303 23 22 110Iraq 28,802 17.9 1,290 28,726 0 50 0 26 1,000 .. 103 22 32 114Israel 18,493 56.9 3,129 18,053 0 3 538 4 171 .. 355 16 21 505Jordan 4,871 52.4 1,018 4,803 0 1 64 3 271 167 170 16 27 103Kuwait 17,289 0.9 9,356 17,289 0 0 0 0 729 .. 1,625 26 14 1,255Lebanon 5,469 136.1 1,591 5,234 0 29 7 125 307 243 259 17 29 190Libyan Arab Jamahiriya 12,254 13.1 2,368 12,117 0 0 0 136 459 .. 184 26 31 333Morocco 9,931 51.4 339 9,273 0 71 0 429 106 69 66 22 9 36Oman 8,469 197.1 3,447 8,469 0 0 0 0 209 .. 162 26 13 237Saudi Arabia 84,907 33.2 4,322 84,902 0 0 0 0 404 .. 282 17 15 416Syrian Arab Rep 18,049 69.1 1,144 17,296 0 748 0 5 352 255 92 22 9 74Tunisia 7,673 44.4 820 6,441 0 8 0 1,224 139 91 200 19 21 79Turkey 70,326 43.8 1,071 60,040 0 2,982 319 6,792 180 161 251 24 17 118United Arab Emirates 28,085 60.0 10,979 28,068 0 0 0 0 564 .. 433 44 9 1,007Yemen 3,139 8.0 178 3,061 0 0 0 77 242 .. 34 5 46 9

a percent of totalConsumption (as

Energy

Indus- Trans-(1000 metric toe) {d}

Energy Consumption by SourceTotal from all sources Renewables

19991999

Energy Intensity: Energy Use per GDP PPP {a}

All EconomicSectors

(toe per million $Intl)

Residentialper Capita(kgoe per

person) {e}trial1999

IndustrySector

Data Table 8 EnergySource: International Energy Agency (IEA)

262W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 2 – 2 0 0 4

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (36)

ElectricityTotal Cons-

(1000 Percent Per Fossil Hydro- Mod- Tradi- umptionmetric Change Capita Fuels Nuclear electric ern {b} tional {c} consumption), 1999 per Capita

toe) {d} Since (kgoe) {e} (kgoe) {e}1999 1989 1999 1999 1999 1999 1999 1999 portation 1999

SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 425 193 .. .. .. ..Angola 7,591 28.7 595 2,032 0 77 0 5,482 678 83 323 9 9 7Benin 1,973 19.5 323 433 0 0 0 1,511 355 69 164 3 15 5Botswana .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Burkina Faso .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Burundi .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Cameroon 6,103 22.5 419 939 0 287 0 4,877 270 214 280 16 10 16Central African Rep .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Chad .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Congo 720 (31.3) 246 124 0 8 0 571 295 5 141 1 15 4Congo, Dem Rep 14,525 26.0 293 888 0 489 0 13,238 454 .. 204 20 2 4Côte d'Ivoire 6,052 34.8 386 1,934 0 101 0 4,113 237 45 151 5 10 17Equatorial Guinea .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Eritrea {l} 681 .. 193 214 0 0 0 467 205 20 108 3 11 4Ethiopia {m} 18,227 24.9 297 1,052 0 138 22 17,016 477 65 6 2 3 2Gabon 1,608 16.4 1,341 647 0 60 0 901 224 111 659 20 16 60Gambia .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Ghana 7,108 37.7 376 1,555 0 344 0 5,196 209 81 206 10 10 17Guinea .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Guinea-Bissau .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Kenya 14,690 18.8 489 2,549 0 282 335 11,512 495 228 243 8 8 11Lesotho .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Liberia .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Madagascar .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Malawi .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Mali .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Mauritania .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Mozambique 6,985 (5.5) 389 387 0 588 0 6,468 480 462 278 23 4 4Namibia 1,108 .. 643 748 0 101 0 169 127 1 98 5 41 101Niger .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Nigeria 87,286 25.7 787 14,410 0 486 0 72,390 881 258 585 10 7 8Rwanda .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Senegal 2,957 36.9 322 1,279 0 0 0 1,678 229 122 138 14 19 10Sierra Leone .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Somalia .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..South Africa 109,334 17.3 2,557 93,483 3,345 62 0 12,466 303 198 272 24 12 320Sudan 15,372 52.4 505 1,851 0 95 0 13,426 900 174 205 3 8 4Tanzania, United Rep 15,033 22.7 438 762 0 187 0 14,079 823 544 312 11 2 5Togo 1,373 44.8 313 321 0 0 0 1,014 218 49 57 5 9 9Uganda .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Zambia 6,190 19.0 608 648 0 690 0 4,985 843 .. 309 18 4 45Zimbabwe 10,170 15.2 820 3,976 0 254 0 5,487 315 .. 430 11 8 77NORTH AMERICA 2,511,765 15.2 8,075 2,127,336 221,874 54,524 19,498 74,745 268 .. 913 17 26 1,052Canada 241,780 10.9 7,929 184,529 19,152 29,711 20 10,851 314 .. 968 28 22 1,312United States {n} 2,269,985 15.7 8,095 1,942,807 202722 24813 19,477 63,894 264 .. 906 16 26 1,023C. AMERICA & CARIBBEAN 205,471 22.9 1,207 169,759 2,607 4,236 6,235 22,586 205 148 178 24 23 105Belize .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Costa Rica 3,052 56.9 776 1,741 0 441 700 181 110 50 77 16 38 116Cuba 12,464 (26.1) 1,117 9,619 0 8 51 2,786 398 .. 65 51 9 84Dominican Rep 7,451 86.4 905 5,960 0 95 0 1,396 166 63 247 13 28 56El Salvador 4,005 61.6 651 1,848 0 152 514 1,470 157 94 214 18 23 49Guatemala 6,074 46.5 548 2,812 0 229 0 3,053 155 90 270 12 21 29Haiti 2,067 27.9 258 489 0 23 0 1,555 187 128 146 14 12 3Honduras 3,267 36.2 522 1,439 0 183 0 1,633 221 126 251 18 20 39Jamaica 4,136 68.6 1,619 3,495 0 10 0 631 456 200 121 14 22 200Mexico 148,991 23.4 1,530 130,612 2,607 2,819 4,882 8,026 196 145 172 22 24 134Nicaragua 2,664 28.9 539 1,176 0 34 88 1,361 221 115 233 14 18 23Panama 2,347 67.1 835 1,648 0 242 0 462 152 144 195 16 28 113Trinidad and Tobago 8,022 56.8 6,225 7,990 0 0 0 32 766 1,021 100 55 8 304SOUTH AMERICA 383,514 34.4 1,126 272,172 2,888 43,346 7,432 57,856 170 174 154 30 25 137Argentina 63,182 38.9 1,727 56,028 1,852 1,864 3 2,975 148 119 253 22 22 167Bolivia 4,572 73.9 562 3,571 0 154 0 846 245 238 121 17 27 34Brazil 179,701 30.8 1,068 107,150 1,036 25,188 7,415 35,645 159 201 121 36 27 156Chile 25,348 95.6 1,688 20,079 0 1,222 7 4,040 200 139 305 25 23 199Colombia 28,081 17.8 678 19,920 0 2,902 0 5,259 122 105 108 25 26 67Ecuador 8,750 45.4 705 6,745 0 620 0 1,383 247 95 153 14 28 53Guyana .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Paraguay 4,140 28.9 773 1,351 0 4,465 7 2,269 185 233 240 33 28 68Peru 13,101 15.3 519 7,442 0 1,251 0 4,409 116 101 198 24 26 56Suriname .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Uruguay 3,232 32.9 976 2,228 0 473 0 488 114 72 216 17 28 161Venezuela 53,406 32.9 2,253 47,658 0 5,208 0 541 421 340 151 29 22 214OCEANIA .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 235 172 .. .. .. ..Australia 107,930 26.6 5,701 101,140 0 1,434 234 4,943 231 172 466 22 25 765Fiji .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..New Zealand 18,176 37.1 4,850 12,346 0 2,023 2,667 835 267 .. 367 29 27 737Papua New Guinea .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Solomon Islands .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..DEVELOPED 5,962,100 .. 4,550 5,002,071 612,157 130,499 35,401 153,852 248 170 651 20 21 568DEVELOPING 3,597,314 38.5 771 2,604,225 39,733 90,276 27,349 833,261 232 149 212 25 13 63a. GDP PPP is Gross Domestic Product in Purchasing Power Parity terms. b. Modern renewables include wind, solar, geothermal, wave/tide, liquids such as ethanol and gas derived from biomass. c. Traditional renewables include fuelwood, crop residues, and biomass left from industrial sources such as papermaking. d. Toe is tons of oil equivalent.e. Kgoe is kilograms of oil equivalent. f. Data for China do not include Taiwan. g. Denmark excludes Greenland and the Danish Faroes. h. The Netherlands excludes Suriname and the Netherlands Antilles. i. Portugal includes the Azores and Madeira. j. Spain includes the Canary Islands. k. Switzerland includes Liechtenstein. l. Data for Eritrea previous to 1992 are included under Ethiopia. m. Data for Ethiopia prior to 1992 include Eritrea. n. The United States includes Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands.

Indus-

a percent of total

Trans-

Consumption (as

(kgoe perper Capita

EnergyEnergy Consumption by Source Energy Intensity: Energy Use

(1000 metric toe) {d} (toe per million $Intl)

Total from all sources Renewables per GDP PPP {a}All Economic

Sectors

1999 1999 1999person) {e}

Sector

trial

IndustryResidential

Data Table 8 continuedMore data tables are available. Log on to http://earthtrends.wri.org/datatables/energy or send an e-mail [emailprotected] with “Instructions” in the message body.

263P a r t I I : D a t a T a b l e s

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (37)

VARIABLE DEFINITIONS AND METHODOLOGYEnergy Consumption by Source is the total amount of pri-mary energy consumed by each country in the year specified,and is reported in thousands of metric tons of oil equivalent(toe). Primary energy also includes losses from transportation,friction, heat loss, and other inefficiencies. Specifically, con-sumption equals indigenous production plus imports, minusexports plus stock changes, minus international marinebunkers. IEA calls this value Total Primary Energy Supply(TPES).

Total From All Sources is total consumption from all energysources including fossil, nuclear, hydroelectric, modern renew-ables, and all renewable fuels and wastes.

Total Fossil Fuels includes energy consumption from oil andnatural gas liquids, coal and coal products, and natural gas.

Nuclear energy consumption shows the primary heat equiva-lent of the electricity produced by nuclear power plants. Heat-to-electricity conversion efficiency is assumed to be 33% (itsaverage in Europe). Hydroelectric includes the energy contentof the electricity produced in hydro power plants. Hydro outputexcludes output from pumped storage.

Modern Renewables include energy from wind; tide, wave andocean; thermal and photovoltaic solar; liquid biomass fuelssuch as ethanol; biogas from digesters; and geothermal sys-tems. Wind includes electrical power generated from windenergy. Tide, wave, ocean represents the amount of energy fromwave, ocean, and tide activity that is captured and transformedinto electrical power. Thermal solar represents solar radiationexploited for hot water production and electricity generationby: (1) flat plate collectors, mainly of the thermosiphon type, fordomestic hot water or for the seasonal heating of swimmingpools and (2) solar thermal-electric plants. Passive solarenergy for the direct heating, cooling, and lighting of dwellingsor other buildings is not included. Solar from photovoltaicsincludes solar energy converted by photovoltaic cells to elec-tricity. Energy from liquid biomass includes liquid derivativesfrom biomass used as a fuel. Biogases are gases derived prin-cipally from the anaerobic fermentation of biomass and solidwastes which are combusted to produce heat and electricalpower. Landfill gases and gases from sewage and animal wastefacilities are included in this category. Ethanol is the main formof liquid biomass produced.

Traditional Renewables include primary solid biomass, i.e.,any plant matter used directly as a fuel or converted into otherforms before combustion, including wood; vegetal waste includ-ing wood waste and crop waste used for energy; animal materi-als and wastes; sulphite lyes (also known as black liquor, this isa sludge that contains the lignin digested from wood for papermaking); and other solid biomass.

All energy consumption values presented here are calculatedand reported by the International Energy Agency (IEA) using anenergy balance methodology that uses metric tons (tonnes) ofoil equivalent (toe)—a common unit based on the calorific con-tent of energy commodities. One toe is defined as 10 Exp.7 kilo-calories, 41.868 gigajoules, or 11,628 giga watt-hours (GWh).This amount of energy is roughly equal to the amount of energycontained in a ton of crude oil. To account for the differences inquality between types of coal and other energy sources, the IEAhas applied specific conversion factors supplied by nationaladministrations for the main categories of energy sources andflows or uses (i.e., production, imports, exports, industry).

Energy statistics are expressed in terms of net calorific valueand therefore may be slightly lower than statistics presented byother statistical compendia. The difference between the net andthe gross calorific value for each fuel is the latent heat of

vaporization of the water produced during combustion of thefuel. For oil and coal, net calorific value is 5 percent less thangross; for most forms of natural and manufactured gas the dif-ference is 9–10 percent. Using net calorific values is consistentwith the United Nations and European Community statisticaloffices.

The IEA has used the following conventions in accountingfor primary energy such as nuclear, solar, geothermal, hydro,wind, etc.: (1) The first form of energy production with multiplepractical uses is reported. This means that heat is the formreported for geothermal heat and electrical production, nuclearheat and electrical production, and solar heat production. Elec-tricity is the form reported for hydro, wind, wave, and photo-voltaic solar electricity production. (2) The physical energy con-tent of the energy source is reported as energy production. Fornuclear fuels, this is the heat energy produced in a nuclearreactor; for hydropower, it is the amount of energy in the elec-tricity produced. Please refer to the original source for furtherinformation on the variables and collection methodologies.

Energy Intensity: All Economic Sectors is the amount ofenergy consumed per unit of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) inPurchase Power Parity (PPP) terms; the units are toe per mil-lion international dollars GDP PPP. This variable provides anindicator of how efficiently, in terms of energy, the economygenerates wealth. Please see the notes in the Economic Indica-tors table for more information on GDP PPP.

WRI calculated energy consumption per GDP PPP usingIEA’s energy consumption data as defined above under TotalFrom All Sources, and IEA’s data on GDP in PPP terms. Totalenergy consumption in each country was divided by total GDPPPP for that country. IEA’s GDP PPP data were used insteadof the World Bank’s figures (which were used for the EconomicIndicators table) as they are reported in constant dollar terms,allowing WRI to calculate a meaningful time series (available inthe EarthTrends searchable database). The calculation wasmade by dividing total energy consumption by total GDP PPP.

Energy Intensity: Industry Sector is the amount of energyconsumed by the industry sector per unit of Gross DomesticProduct (GDP) in Purchase Power Parity (PPP) terms gener-ated by industry. This variable, reported in toe per million inter-national dollars GDP PPP, indicates, in energy terms, how effi-ciently the industry sector generates wealth. The industrysector is defined as including International Standard IndustrialClassification (ISIC) divisions 15–37 (please see http://unstats.un.org/unsd/cr/registry/regcst.asp?Cl=17 for moreinformation on ISIC classifications).

Industrial energy intensity was calculated in a similar fash-ion as described above for all economic sectors: Industrialenergy consumption was divided by the amount of GDP PPPgenerated by the industry sector. Unlike the indicator abovewhich used data in the form provided by IEA, WRI adjustedsome data elements to make this calculation. The definition ofindustry was determined by the percent of GDP generated byindustry, provided by World Development Indicators.This vari-able defines industry as including International StandardIndustrial Classification (ISIC) divisions 15–37. WRI adjustedIEA’s value for industrial energy consumption by subtractingenergy consumed by mining and quarrying (ISIC Divisions13–14) and construction (ISIC division 45) from IEA’s totalindustrial energy consumption. The only differences remainingafter this adjustment are that the World Bank definitionincludes the manufacture of coke, petroleum products, andother derived fossil fuels (ISIC division 23), manufacture ofcoke oven products (ISIC group 231), manufacture of refinedpetroleum products (ISIC group 232), and processing of nuclearfuels. According to the IEA, however, the energy consumed forthese activities is captured by the energy contained in the origi-nal fuels used for these processes. The differences remaining

264W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 2 – 2 0 0 4

Data Table 8 continued

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (38)

between the World Bank and IEA definitions of the industry andmanufacturing sector should therefore be small. After the defi-nitions for industrial energy consumption and the percentage ofGDP generated by industry were brought into agreement,industrial GDP PPP was calculated by multiplying total GDPPPP by the percent generated by industry, and industrialenergy consumption was divided by this value.

Residential Energy Use Per Capita, reported in kilograms ofoil equivalent (kgoe) is the average amount of energy consumedper person by the residential sector. The residential sectorincludes all energy used for activities by households except fortransportation. The variable provides an indicator of how muchenergy people in different countries require for housing.

Energy Consumption by Residences Per Capita was calcu-lated by dividing the IEA data defined above by total populationprovided by the United Nations Population Division. Please seethe Population, Health, and Human Well-Being table for moreinformation on the population data.

Energy Consumption by Industry as a Percent of TotalConsumption and Energy Consumption by Transportationas a Percent of Total Consumption is the percentage of thetotal amount of energy, from all sources, consumed by industryand transportation, respectively. Units for both variables arethe percentage of the total energy consumed by that country.

The industry sector is defined for this variable as the com-bination of all industrial sub-sectors, such as mining and quar-rying, iron and steel, construction, etc. Energy used for trans-port by industry is not included here but is reported undertransportation.

Transportation represents both road and air transportation.Road transport includes all fuels used in road vehicles, includ-ing military, as well as agricultural and industrial highway use.The sector excludes motor gasoline used in stationary enginesand diesel oil used in tractors. Air transportation includes bothdomestic and international transport. The domestic sectorincludes deliveries of aviation fuels to all domestic air trans-port: commercial, private, agricultural, military, etc. It alsoincludes use for purposes other than flying, e.g., bench testingof engines, but not airline use of fuel for road transport. Formany countries this also incorrectly includes fuel used bydomestically owned carriers for outbound international traffic.The international air transportation sector includes deliveriesof aviation fuels to all international civil aviation.

The amount of energy consumed by industry and transporta-tion as a percent of total energy consumption was calculated bydividing the amount of energy consumed by these sectors bythe total energy consumption in that country.

Electricity Consumption Per Capita is the amount of elec-tricity consumed on average by each person, regardless ofsource, and is represented in kilograms of oil equivalent. Thefigure reported is final consumption, which measures only theamount of energy delivered to the end user. Losses due totransportation, friction, heat loss, and other inefficiencies arenot included.

Final Electricity Consumption Per Capita was calculated bydividing total electricity consumption in each country by thatcountry’s total population.

FREQUENCY OF UPDATE BY DATA PROVIDERSIEA updates their energy data annually. The UN PopulationDivision updates the figures used for per capita calculationsevery other year. These updates also often include revisions ofpast data. Data may therefore differ from those reported in pasteditions of the World Resources report.

DATA RELIABILITY AND CAUTIONARY NOTESEnergy DataThe energy balances data are based primarily on well-established and institutionalized accounting methodologies,and are therefore considered reliable. One exception is fuel-wood and other biomass fuels, which are estimated by the IEAbased on small sample surveys or other incomplete informa-tion. The data give only a broad impression of trends and shouldnot be strictly compared between countries. The IEA reportsthat it can be difficult to distinguish between agriculture, com-mercial, and public sectors, and there may be some overlap inthese sectors. IEA data do not distinguish between “no data”(denoted in these tables with .. ) and zero values. WRI has dis-tinguished between the two where possible, but some valuesrepresented as zero should probably be indicated by .. and viceversa.

Please note that, in a departure from World Resources2000–01, energy consumption by energy sector is based on pri-mary energy supply as opposed to total final consumption. Thefigures should therefore not be used in conjunction with datafrom that edition to indicate change in any sector’s relativeenergy use. Please see the EarthTrends searchable database athttp://earthtrends.wri.org for a time series on energy data.

Energy Intensity VariablesAs is the case with the energy data, economic data collectionin most countries is well-established and institutionalized,resulting in accurate information. A number of countries, par-ticularly rapidly developing countries, however, over-reportGDP and the rate of GDP growth in their countries. This willmake those countries appear more energy efficient than theyactually are.

SOURCESEnergy Variables: International Energy Agency (IEA), 2001.Energy Balances of OECD Countries (2001 Edition) and EnergyBalances of non-OECD Countries (2001 Edition). Paris: Organi-sation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).Electronic database available on-line at: http://data.iea.org/.Population (used to calculate per capita values): PopulationDivision of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs ofthe United Nations Secretariat, 2002. World PopulationProspects: The 2000 Revision. New York: United Nations. Dataset available on CD-ROM.

265P a r t I I : D a t a T a b l e s

Data Table 8 continued

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (39)

Food Supply Fish Populationfrom Fish Protein as withinand Fish a Percent Number 100 km

Metric Percent Metric Percent Metric Percent Products of All Number of Decked of the Tons Change Tons Change Tons Change (kg/person/ Animal of Fishery Coast(000) Since (000) Since (000) Since Exports Imports year) {d} Protein Fishers Vessels {e} (percent)

1998-00 1988-90 1998-00 1988-90 1998-00 1988-90 1998-00 1998-00 1997-99 1997-99 2000 1995 1995WORLD 81,601.9 2 9,550.7 31 33,179.7 63 52,548.9 57,624.7 16.0 16 34,501,411 1,256,841 39ASIA (EXCL. MIDDLE EAST) 36,527.8 20 5,751.2 61 26,625.3 62 15,235.0 20,418.1 18.0 28 28,890,352 1,057,966 38Armenia .. .. 1.0 (63) 0.7 .. 0.3 1.0 0.5 1 244 f 6 0Azerbaijan 0.0 (67) 14.8 (70) 0.2 .. 1.7 1.3 0.9 1 1,500 f .. 56Bangladesh 179.6 27 754.6 47 597.4 69 313.6 2.5 10.2 47 1,320,480 61 55Bhutan .. .. 0.3 - 0.0 67 .. .. .. .. 450 f .. 0Cambodia 36.4 25 184.1 212 14.5 62 35.3 3.1 12.0 35 73,425 g .. 24China 14,395.9 170 2,367.1 188 22,722.0 73 3,081.3 1,315.0 24.5 21 12,233,128 h 432,674 24Georgia 2.2 (99) 0.2 (60) 0.1 .. 0.3 1.6 1.3 2 1,900 f 82 39India 2,726.5 33 753.5 48 2,039.2 52 1,221.4 24.0 4.7 14 5,958,744 f 56,600 26Indonesia 3,624.7 69 375.3 18 722.5 37 1,582.2 69.7 19.0 56 5,118,571 67,325 96Japan 4,836.3 (52) 285.1 (3) 763.0 (5) 756.2 14,406.3 65.4 45 260,200 360,747 96Kazakhstan 0.0 (83) 23.3 (70) 1.2 .. 13.2 13.3 1.9 2 16,000 f 1,970 4Korea, Dem People's Rep 190.2 (87) 20.0 (66) 67.9 23 69.6 5.6 9.4 36 129,000 f 2,900 93Korea, Rep 1,968.3 (16) 16.4 (59) 317.9 (30) 1,346.6 1,037.6 47.3 39 176,928 j 76,801 100Kyrgyzstan .. .. 0.1 (79) 0.1 .. .. 2.0 0.7 1 154 f .. 0Lao People's Dem Rep .. .. 26.3 34 31.2 73 0.0 1.4 10.0 31 15,000 f .. 6Malaysia 1,201.8 42 20.4 74 146.8 65 189.6 262.6 57.0 35 100,666 f 17,965 98Mongolia .. .. 0.4 91 .. .. 0.2 0.0 0.1 0 0 .. 0Myanmar 772.7 33 166.2 21 90.7 93 162.0 1.0 16.0 45 610,000 f 140 49Nepal .. .. 13.8 131 13.6 48 0.2 0.3 1.1 3 50,000 f .. 0Pakistan 448.3 28 173.9 78 17.6 50 141.9 0.4 2.5 3 272,273 5,064 9Philippines 1,719.0 14 146.4 (37) 342.7 (5) 408.7 109.2 29.6 42 990,872 f 3,220 100Singapore 6.5 (44) 0.04 (68) 4.3 55 413.6 483.9 .. .. 364 110 100Sri Lanka 255.3 67 32.7 4 10.2 45 103.5 66.5 21.2 54 146,188 2,990 100Tajikistan .. .. 0.1 (81) 0.1 .. .. 0.2 0.1 0 200 f .. 0Thailand 2,654.6 14 206.5 77 664.5 61 4,180.5 841.3 28.2 37 354,495 17,600 39Turkmenistan 0.0 (93) 9.4 (79) 0.6 (338) 0.4 0.1 1.7 2 611 i 45 8Uzbekistan .. .. 3.0 (40) 5.9 (257) 0.0 2.0 0.5 1 4,800 .. 3Viet Nam 1,217.6 92 156.3 19 463.6 66 1,080.4 12.1 18.1 37 1,000,000 140 83EUROPE 15,710.1 (24) 674.7 (18) 1,726.0 13 19,063.8 22,875.8 20.6 10 855,333 105,324 40Albania 2.1 (73) 0.8 (64) 0.2 .. 6.5 4.5 2.4 1 1,590 j 2 97Austria .. .. 0.6 4 2.9 (37) 9.0 189.7 14.3 4 2,300 .. 2Belarus .. .. 0.5 (84) 5.6 (203) 16.4 72.8 8.5 4 5,000 f .. 0Belgium 29.7 (27) 0.5 4 1.4 49 471.9 1,059.0 .. .. 544 j 156 83Bosnia and Herzegovina 0.0 .. 2.5 .. .. .. .. 8.3 1.9 2 3,500 f .. 47Bulgaria 10.2 (87) 1.9 37 5.2 (102) 7.2 15.5 4.2 3 1,483 f 30 29Croatia 20.6 .. 0.4 .. 6.3 .. 40.9 38.1 5.2 5 65,151 l 305 38Czech Rep .. .. 4.3 .. 18.5 .. 27.7 79.4 12.7 5 2,243 .. 0Denmark 1,497.3 (15) 1.5 (71) 42.9 19 2,856.3 1,804.9 26.0 10 6,711 j 4,285 100Estonia 110.2 (72) 4.4 (36) 0.2 (286) 86.6 37.6 19.7 12 13,346 186 86Finland 108.7 28 56.4 (16) 15.6 (14) 19.1 127.5 33.6 14 5,879 3,838 73France 573.2 (10) 3.3 (40) 266.8 11 1,104.7 3,275.8 31.3 9 26,113 g 6,586 40Germany 212.6 (33) 24.5 96 66.8 (1) 1,044.5 2,403.1 14.9 7 4,358 2,406 15Greece 104.4 (16) 4.4 15 73.1 92 248.5 301.0 26.0 11 19,847 18,375 99Hungary .. .. 7.3 (58) 11.7 (60) 8.1 45.7 4.3 2 4,900 .. 0Iceland 1,799.9 13 0.3 (57) 3.8 50 1,352.0 80.3 93.1 n 30 6,100 826 100Ireland 290.2 38 2.6 (52) 45.8 52 356.4 113.5 16.0 6 8,478 i 1,353 100Italy 298.7 (24) 5.2 (61) 208.8 34 370.5 2,705.7 24.2 11 48,770 16,000 79Latvia 120.2 (77) 1.2 (43) 0.4 (853) 54.4 35.9 15.4 11 6,571 351 75Lithuania 57.8 (85) 1.9 (63) 1.7 (152) 40.0 56.1 22.0 15 4,700 f 131 23Macedonia, FYR .. .. 0.2 .. 1.5 .. 0.6 8.8 5.1 5 8,472 .. 14Moldova, Rep .. .. 0.3 (86) 1.1 (537) 2.0 4.6 3.3 4 40 f .. 9Netherlands 513.6 27 2.1 (47) 101.4 5 1,490.2 1,237.0 19.7 9 3,743 1,008 93Norway 2,726.8 59 1.4 (56) 458.2 74 3,668.3 635.4 52.2 26 23,552 8,664 95Poland 211.1 (60) 19.5 23 33.1 21 266.8 293.7 12.8 11 8,640 i 445 14Portugal 206.6 (37) 0.04 (23) 7.1 (12) 276.6 936.1 65.7 23 25,021 9,265 93Romania 3.0 (98) 5.1 (75) 9.4 (369) 5.4 38.8 2.5 2 8,519 33 6Russian Federation 3,700.0 (50) 488.3 (10) 68.6 (179) 1,269.1 230.6 21.7 15 316,300 3,584 15Serbia and Montenegro 0.4 .. 1.2 .. 4.3 .. 0.8 44.0 2.9 1 1,429 f 5 8Slovakia .. .. 1.7 .. 0.8 .. 2.2 36.3 8.3 5 215 .. 0Slovenia 1.8 .. 0.2 .. 1.1 .. 6.4 28.5 6.9 3 231 11 61Spain 1,133.8 (8) 8.9 (6) 316.3 26 1,582.1 3,399.6 44.4 18 75,434 f 15,243 68Sweden 363.2 51 3.6 (46) 5.5 (55) 472.0 688.9 30.4 14 2,783 1,240 88Switzerland .. .. 1.8 (49) 1.1 26 3.1 374.1 18.3 7 522 .. 0Ukraine 409.3 (57) 11.6 (81) 31.0 (193) 56.4 109.6 11.4 10 120,000 f 444 21United Kingdom 830.6 (1) 4.2 81 148.2 69 1,421.8 2,294.9 21.8 10 17,847 i 9,562 99MIDDLE EAST & N. AFRICA 2,348.0 24 411.0 74 355.9 62 .. 756.3 7.2 9 746,955 21,990 47Afghanistan .. .. 1.1 10 .. .. .. .. .. .. 1,500 f .. 0Algeria 98.2 (1) 0.0 .. 0.3 (35) 2.7 11.2 3.5 6 26,151 i 2,184 69Egypt 156.0 81 219.8 44 235.3 75 1.6 157.3 11.2 19 250,000 .. 53Iran, Islamic Rep 248.3 23 140.3 424 35.2 25 48.2 56.1 4.4 7 138,965 900 24Iraq 12.5 204 10.1 (43) 3.8 16 .. 0.6 1.5 8 12,000 f 8 6Israel 4.2 (57) 1.8 8 19.1 23 8.2 133.2 23.4 9 1,535 f 384 97Jordan 0.1 .. 0.4 10 0.5 87 .. 23.4 5.1 5 721 .. 29Kuwait 5.8 (19) 1.0 127 0.3 .. 5.3 16.4 12.1 5 670 j 917 100Lebanon 3.6 122 0.0 .. 0.4 75 .. 24.2 8.0 7 9,825 5 100Libyan Arab Jamahiriya 33.0 45 0.0 - 0.1 50 35.0 11.3 6.1 7 9,500 f 93 79Morocco 782.3 43 1.8 16 2.2 89 815.3 11.3 8.4 17 106,096 3,052 65Oman 110.1 (18) 0.0 - 5.1 22 46.6 5.3 .. .. 28,003 j 390 88Saudi Arabia 49.1 10 0.1 .. 5.4 78 8.6 108.5 7.6 6 25,360 23 30Syrian Arab Rep 2.6 81 4.6 282 6.7 58 .. 48.9 1.8 2 11,292 5 34Tunisia 90.9 (4) 1.0 291 1.5 37 94.7 13.1 9.4 12 50,815 17 84Turkey 491.3 5 28.9 (12) 66.2 93 96.4 62.7 8.0 10 33,614 f 9,710 58United Arab Emirates 112.5 22 0.1 82 0.0 .. 36.8 27.5 25.9 12 15,543 4,050 85Yemen 122.3 64 0.0 .. .. .. 26.1 4.8 6.8 22 12,200 j 71 63

(annual average)million US$)

(annual average) (annual averageCatch {a}Marine Freshwater

ProductionCatch {b}(annual average)

Total Aquaculture Trade in Fish andFish Products {c}

Data Table 9 Fisheries and AquacultureSources: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, United Nations Population Division

266W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 2 – 2 0 0 4

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (40)

Food Supply Fish Populationfrom Fish Protein as withinand Fish a Percent Number 100 km

Metric Percent Metric Percent Metric Percent Products of All Number of Decked of the Tons Change Tons Change Tons Change (kg/person/ Animal of Fishery Coast(000) Since (000) Since (000) Since Exports Imports year) {d} Protein Fishers Vessels {e} (percent)

1998-00 1988-90 1998-00 1988-90 1998-00 1988-90 1998-00 1998-00 1997-99 1997-99 2000 1995 1995SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA 2806.5 15 1808.0 13 37.2 25 1,691.4 845.5 7.6 25 1,995,694 j 71 21Angola 186.4 50 6.0 (25) .. .. 10.8 14.3 10.4 28 30,364 f 580 29Benin 13.8 6 24.5 (6) 0.0 .. 2.2 4.7 8.7 26 61,793 5 62Botswana .. .. 0.2 (89) .. .. 0.1 5.3 6.1 5 2,620 f .. 0Burkina Faso .. .. 8.1 7 0.0 .. 0.0 1.4 1.9 6 8,300 .. 0Burundi .. .. 10.9 (18) 0.1 60 0.2 0.1 2.3 23 7,030 j .. 0Cameroon 59.6 21 50.0 138 0.1 (117) 2.7 30.2 12.3 31 24,500 25 22Central African Rep .. .. 14.8 14 0.1 20 .. 0.4 4.2 9 5,410 .. 0Chad .. .. 84.0 31 .. .. .. .. 6.9 14 300,000 g .. 0Congo 20.6 (6) 25.5 10 0.2 (29) 2.4 19.7 21.4 46 10,500 26 25Congo, Dem Rep 3.9 97 194.4 21 0.4 (66) 0.5 42.5 6.7 34 108,400 23 3Côte d'Ivoire 65.5 (2) 11.5 (59) 1.0 86 171.0 171.7 14.2 42 19,707 f 63 40Equatorial Guinea 4.5 34 1.0 162 .. .. 2.8 2.1 .. .. 9,218 5 72Eritrea 7.0 .. 0.0 .. .. .. 1.0 0.1 0.9 3 14,500 f .. 73Ethiopia {k} .. .. 15.2 365 0.0 .. .. .. 0.2 1 6,272 .. 1Gabon 40.4 114 10.1 421 0.4 .. 14.0 7.1 49.6 37 8,258 39 63Gambia 26.5 69 2.5 (7) 0.0 .. 4.9 1.3 24.1 64 2,000 f .. 91Ghana 384.6 24 77.9 24 0.5 18 81.1 97.3 28.1 66 230,000 f 500 42Guinea 78.9 108 4.0 33 0.0 .. 23.1 14.3 11.2 51 10,707 f 15 41Guinea-Bissau 5.1 3 .. .. .. .. 3.1 0.4 4.4 14 2,500 f 8 95Kenya 6.0 (29) 191.7 25 0.3 (188) 36.8 6.3 5.4 10 59,565 32 8Lesotho .. .. 0.0 494 0.00 .. .. .. 0.0 0 60 f .. 0Liberia 8.5 3 4.1 (1) 0.0 .. 0.0 1.9 5.9 26 5,143 14 58Madagascar 98.9 47 30.0 (10) 5.9 96 77.0 6.4 7.5 16 83,310 j 65 55Malawi .. .. 43.8 (41) 0.4 55 0.2 0.3 4.5 34 42,922 j 57 0Mali .. .. 102.1 55 0.1 80 0.4 2.2 8.8 15 70,000 i .. 0Mauritania 32.9 (51) 5.0 (17) .. .. 70.1 0.5 10.6 11 7,944 g 126 40Mozambique 25.8 (16) 10.8 215 0.0 .. 84.0 8.8 2.7 21 20,000 f 291 59Namibia 305.0 191 1.5 49 0.0 50 266.1 .. 11.6 20 2,700 f 218 5Niger .. .. 11.4 226 0.0 (100) 0.7 0.6 0.9 3 7,983 f .. 0Nigeria 316.4 66 136.9 46 22.6 35 4.8 231.6 8.8 32 481,264 g 318 26Rwanda .. .. 6.6 287 0.2 65 .. 0.1 1.0 7 5,690 .. 0Senegal 378.8 42 27.3 47 0.1 82 287.6 7.0 32.1 45 55,547 j 180 83Sierra Leone 49.5 32 16.3 (0) 0.03 33 14.6 3.3 13.6 61 17,990 f 27 55Somalia 20.7 (2) 0.2 (50) .. .. 3.7 .. 2.9 2 18,900 f 12 55South Africa 596.4 (34) 0.9 10 4.4 47 259.0 64.1 6.9 8 10,500 f 600 39Sudan 5.7 336 44.0 52 1.0 88 0.4 0.4 1.7 2 27,700 j .. 3Tanzania, United Rep 49.6 (4) 280.0 (18) 0.2 (30) 66.8 0.4 8.9 32 92,529 30 21Togo 15.4 34 5.2 20 0.1 89 1.8 14.2 13.4 51 14,120 3 45Uganda .. .. 267.5 19 0.2 80 33.8 0.1 8.9 28 57,862 j .. 0Zambia .. .. 68.0 6 4.2 70 0.4 0.9 7.4 25 23,833 f 235 0Zimbabwe .. .. 14.0 (41) 0.2 11 2.2 9.3 2.7 10 1,804 i .. 0NORTH AMERICA 5457.1 (19) 419.4 (19) 559.8 32 5,682.6 10,840.9 21.5 12 303,784 45,480 41Canada 933.5 (37) 68.9 (56) 109.1 70 2,575.9 1,318.9 23.8 10 8,696 18,280 24United States 4365.8 (15) 350.5 (3) 450.7 23 2,847.5 9,511.3 21.3 7 290,000 f 27,200 43C. AMERICA & CARIBBEAN 1582.5 (7) 117.0 (25) 132.8 (697) 1,529.2 423.0 8.8 14 446,390 7,161 55Belize 37.8 .. 0.0 (50) 2.5 92 27.7 2.4 13.0 13 1,872 12 100Costa Rica 23.2 40 1.0 233 9.0 95 177.4 27.4 5.9 5 6,510 j 1,003 100Cuba 58.4 (68) 5.0 (61) 51.5 86 90.1 26.9 13.1 16 11,865 f 1,250 100Dominican Rep 9.2 (44) 0.6 (57) 1.2 80 0.9 52.4 12.6 10 9,286 .. 100El Salvador 7.5 2 2.6 (5) 0.3 (119) 31.9 6.9 2.9 4 24,534 80 99Guatemala 13.7 324 6.9 477 4.0 79 29.9 7.6 1.6 3 17,275 85 61Haiti 4.6 (9) 0.5 58 .. .. 3.4 7.4 3.1 11 4,700 f 1 100Honduras 10.8 (25) 0.1 115 8.3 62 40.2 14.8 2.9 3 21,000 i 280 65Jamaica 6.5 (18) 0.5 1 4.0 23 13.0 56.0 25.5 20 23,465 5 100Mexico 1130.8 (9) 98.5 (27) 47.7 60 694.0 125.2 9.6 8 262,401 3,100 29Nicaragua 21.7 444 1.2 813 4.8 99 87.1 6.5 3.3 7 14,502 280 72Panama 182.2 27 0.0 21 5.3 28 232.8 15.4 11.0 8 13,062 695 100Trinidad and Tobago 9.1 12 0.0 - 0.02 .. 11.8 7.7 14.2 14 7,297 19 100SOUTH AMERICA 14649.6 1 345.7 6 318.2 61 4,980.1 687.7 8.9 12 784,051 13,106 49Argentina 1006.7 101 24.7 133 1.3 77 824.7 86.5 8.5 4 12,320 800 45Bolivia 0.9 (64) 5.2 59 0.4 21 0.1 5.6 1.7 2 7,754 f .. 0Brazil 520.5 (16) 180.9 (6) 132.7 86 168.7 357.0 6.5 4 290,000 f 1,450 49Chile 4150.8 (26) 0.0 (97) 319.6 94 1,694.4 54.1 17.6 10 50,873 563 82Colombia 101.7 71 25.1 (37) 53.6 88 195.1 86.5 4.5 5 129,410 i 167 30Ecuador 466.4 (18) 0.4 (32) 112.0 33 915.7 16.1 7.0 9 162,870 g 515 61Guyana 51.2 44 0.7 (16) 0.5 92 38.6 0.7 59.9 47 6,571 55 77Paraguay .. .. 25.0 124 0.1 44 0.1 2.3 5.5 4 4,469 g .. 0Peru 7773.0 15 34.6 2 7.6 34 852.2 15.4 20.3 21 66,361 7,710 57Suriname 16.0 209 0.2 (27) 0.2 .. 6.9 4.1 24.6 24 3,628 f 22 87Uruguay 117.9 11 2.2 878 0.0 .. 115.0 13.4 8.6 4 4,023 958 78Venezuela 389.9 37 46.7 41 11.1 94 126.9 45.5 18.3 19 44,302 i 866 73OCEANIA 1110.1 75 23.0 (1) 127.6 62 1,681.7 629.9 22.7 25 85,324 1,917 87Australia 214.6 13 4.1 9 33.9 62 885.7 518.8 21.3 7 13,800 i 246 90Fiji 27.9 17 5.5 18 1.3 99 28.5 16.8 32.1 21 8,985 j .. 100New Zealand 594.9 97 1.6 (20) 90.4 69 682.2 55.9 30.3 13 1,928 1,375 100Papua New Guinea 47.1 271 11.7 (7) 0.0 .. 31.7 11.5 15.1 31 16,000 f 35 61Solomon Islands 46.8 (0) 0.0 - 0.0 .. 10.2 0.2 52.5 82 11,000 m 130 100DEVELOPED 27258.0 (30) 1439.3 (21) 3180.4 12 27,094.4 48,905.7 23.7 10 1,467,401 516,259 45DEVELOPING 53010.2 32 8110.6 49 26702.3 60 24,010.7 8,571.6 13.8 20 32,640,482 740,322

Production

Negative values are shown in parentheses. a. Includes marine fish and diadromous fish caught in marine areas, as well as molluscs and crustaceans. b. Includes freshwater fish and diadromous fish caught in inland waters or low-salinity marine areas, as well as molluscs and crustaceans. c. Includes trade of all marine and freshwater catch, and total aquaculture production, excluding aquatic plants. d. Per capita values are expressed on a live-weight equivalent basis, which means that all parts of the fish, including bones, are taken into account when estimating consumption of fish and fishery products. e. Includes fishing vessels such as trawlers, long liners, etc., and non-fishing vessels such as motherships, fish carriers, etc. f. Data were collected between 1991 and 1996. g. Data are for 1997. h. Does not include Taiwan or Hong Kong. i. Data are for 1998. j. Data are for 1999. k. Data for Ethiopia before 1993 include Eritrea l. Since independence, data include a substantial but unquantifiable number of sport fishers. m. Data are for 1980. n. Per capita fish consumption in Iceland includes quantities of fish and fish products destined for the export market.

(annual average) (annual average) (annual average(annual average)Catch {a} Catch {b}

Total AquacultureMarine Freshwater

million US$)

Trade in Fish andFish Products {c}

267P a r t I I : D a t a T a b l e s

Data Table 9 continuedMore Fisheries and Aquaculture data tables are available. Log on to http://earthtrends.wri.org/datatables/coastal or send ane-mail to [emailprotected] with “Instructions” in the message body.

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (41)

VARIABLE DEFINITIONS AND METHODOLOGYMarine and Freshwater Catch data refer to marine and fresh-water fish caught or trapped for commercial, industrial, andsubsistence use (catches from recreational activities areincluded where available); data refer to fish caught by a coun-try’s fleet anywhere in the world. Statistics for mariculture,aquaculture, and other kinds of fish or shellfish farming are notincluded in the country totals. Marine fish includes demersalfish (flounders, halibuts, soles, etc.; cods, hakes, haddocks,etc.; redfishes, basses, congers, etc.; and sharks, rays,chimeras, etc.), pelagic fish (jacks, mullets, sauries, etc.; her-rings, sardines, anchovies, etc.; tunas, bonitos, billfishes, etc.;and mackerels, snooks, cutlassfishes, etc.), and diadromousfish caught in marine areas (i.e., sturgeons, paddlefishes, rivereels, salmons, trouts, smelt, shads, and miscellaneous diadro-mous fishes), marine molluscs (squids, cuttlefishes, octopuses,etc.; abalones, winkles, conchs, etc.; oysters; mussels; scallops,pectens, etc.; clams, cockles, arkshells, etc.; and miscellaneousmarine molluscs) and marine crustaceans (sea-spiders, crabs,etc.; lobsters, spiny-rock lobsters, etc.; squat lobsters; shrimps,prawns, etc.; krill, planktonic crustaceans, etc.; and miscella-neous marine crustaceans).

Freshwater fish includes fish caught in inland waters (i.e.,carps, barbels, and other cyprinids; tilapias and other cichlids;and miscellaneous and freshwater fishes), and diadromous fishcaught in inland waters, as well as freshwater molluscs andcrustaceans. Catch figures are the national totals averagedover a 3-year period.

Data are represented as nominal catches, which are thelandings converted to a live-weight basis, that is, the weightwhen caught. Fish catch does not include discards. Landingsfor some countries are identical to catches. Catch data are pro-vided annually to the Food and Agriculture Organization of theUnited Nations (FAO) Fisheries Department by national fisheryoffices and regional fishery commissions. Some recent data areprovisional. If no data are submitted, FAO uses the previousyear’s figures or makes estimates based on other information.

Aquaculture is defined by FAO as “the farming of aquaticorganisms, including fish, molluscs, and crustaceans. Farmingimplies some form of intervention in the rearing process toenhance production, such as regular stocking, feeding, and pro-tection from predators, etc. [It] also implies ownership of thestock being cultivated.…” Aquatic organisms that areexploitable by the public as a common property resource areincluded in the harvest of fisheries.

FAO’s global collection of aquaculture statistics from ques-tionnaires to national fishery offices was begun in 1984. FAO’saquaculture database has 337 “species items” that are groupedinto six categories. Total Aquaculture Production includesmarine, freshwater, and diadromous fishes, molluscs and crus-taceans cultivated in marine, inland, or brackish environments.For a detailed listing of species, please refer to the originalsource. Aquaculture production is expressed as an annual aver-age over a 3-year period.

Trade in Fish and Fish Products expresses the value associ-ated with imports and exports of fish that are live, fresh,chilled, frozen, dried, salted, smoked, or canned, and otherderived products and preparations. Trade includes freshwaterand marine fish, aquaculture, molluscs and crustaceans, meals,and solubles. Aquatic plants are not included. Figures are thenational totals averaged over a 3-year period in millions of U.S.dollars. Exports are generally on a free-on-board basis (i.e., notincluding insurance or freight costs). Imports are usually on acost, insurance, and freight basis (i.e., insurance and freightcosts added in).

Regional totals are calculated by adding up imports orexports of each country included in that region. Therefore, theregional totals should not be taken as a net trade for that

region, since there may also be trade occurring within a region.To collate national data, FAO uses its International StandardStatistical Classification of Fishery Commodities. Commodi-ties produced by aquaculture and other kinds of fish farmingare also included.

Food Supply from Fish and Fish Products is defined as thequantity of both freshwater and marine fish, seafood andderived products available for human consumption. Data werecalculated by taking a country’s fish production plus imports offish and fishery products, minus exports, minus the amount offishery production destined to non-food uses (i.e., reduction tomeal, etc.), and plus or minus variations in stocks. The quantityof fish and fish products consumed include the bones and allparts of the fish.

Fish Protein as a Percent of Animal Protein Supply isdefined as the quantity of protein from both freshwater andmarine fish, seafood, and derived products available for humanconsumption as a percentage of all available animal protein.FAO calculates food supply for all products, including fish, inits food balance sheets. FAOSTAT maintains statistics onapparent consumption of fish and fishery products, in liveweight, for 220 countries in a collection of Supply/UtilizationAccounts (SUAs). For each product, the SUA traces suppliesfrom production, imports, and stocks to its utilization in differ-ent forms—addition to stocks; exports; animal feed; seed; pro-cessing for food and non-food purposes; waste (or losses); andlastly; as food available for human consumption, where appro-priate. For more detailed information, please refer to the fol-lowing article: “Supply Utilization Accounts and Food BalanceSheets in the Context of a National Statistical System,” main-tained on-line by FAO at http://www.fao.org/es/ESS/Suafbs.htm.

Number of Fishers includes the number of people employed incommercial and subsistence fishing (both personnel on fishingvessels and on shore), operating in freshwater, brackish andmarine areas, and in aquaculture production activities. Data onpeople employed in fishing and aquaculture are collected by theFAO through annual questionnaires submitted to the nationalreporting offices of the member countries. When possible,other national and/or regional published sources are also usedto estimate figures. Please refer to the original source for fur-ther information on collection methodologies (available on-lineat http://www.fao.org/fi/statist/fisoft/fishers.asp) or to thefollowing publication: Numbers of Fishers 1970–1997, FAO Fish-eries Circular N. 929 Revision 2, Fishery Information, Data andStatistics Unit (FAO, Rome, 1999).

Decked Fishery Vessels include trawlers, purse seiners, gillnetters, long liners, trap setters, other seiners and liners, multi-purpose vessels, dredgers, and other fishing vessels. Data onundecked vessels are being collected by FAO, but are not yetavailable. Fleet data are collected by the FAO through ques-tionnaires submitted to the national reporting offices of themember countries. Other national or regional publishedsources, such as the registry of fishing vessels, are also usedto estimate fleet size. The flag of the vessel is used to assignits nationality. However, in many cases vessels are flagged inone country, while the ownership, landings, and trade resideswith another nation. This approach is referred to as a “flag ofconvenience,” and fishers or corporations use this method tofacilitate registration of a vessel (i.e., some countries havefewer registration restrictions), to gain access to fish in differ-ent Exclusive Economic Zones, or to avoid having to follow setfishing quotas in their own nation.

Population within 100 km of the Coast refers to estimates ofthe percentage of the population living within the coastal area

268W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 2 – 2 0 0 4

Data Table 9 continued

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (42)

based on 1995 population figures. These estimates were calcu-lated using a data set that provides information on the spatialdistribution of the world’s human population on a 2.5-minutegrid. Populations are distributed according to administrativedistricts, which vary in scale, level, and size from country tocountry. A 100-km coastal buffer was used to calculate thenumber of people in the coastal zone for each country. The per-centage of the population in the coastal zone was calculatedfrom 1995 United Nations Population Division totals for eachcountry.

FREQUENCY OF UPDATE BY DATA PROVIDERSFAO updates the FishStat database annually. Updates can befound on the FishStat website at http://www.fao.org/fi/statist/FISOFT/FISHPLUS.asp. The FAO updates the dataon Food Supply variables annually; the most recent updatesincorporated in these tables are from July 2002. Data on thenumber of fishers and decked fishery vessels are updated bythe Fishery Information, Data and Statistics Unit (FIDI) ofFAO.

DATA RELIABILITY AND CAUTIONARY NOTESMarine Catch, Freshwater Catch, Total Aquaculture Pro-duction, and Trade in Fish and Fishery Products. While theFAO data set provides the most extensive, global time series offishery statistics since 1970, there are some problems associ-ated with the data. Funding for the development and mainte-nance of fisheries statistics at the national level has beendecreasing in real terms since 1992, while the demand is grow-ing for a variety of global statistics on discards, fish invento-ries, aquaculture, and illegal activities. Country-level data areoften submitted with a 1–2 year delay, and countries are declar-ing an increasing percentage of their catch as “unidentifiedfish.” Stock assessment working groups can more accuratelyestimate the composition of a catch; however, due to financialconstraints, these groups are rare, especially in developingcountries. Statistics from smaller artisanal and subsistencefisheries are particularly sparse. In addition, fishers sometimesunderreport their catches because they have not kept withinharvest limits established to manage the fishery. In somecases, catch statistics are inflated to increase the importanceof the fishing industry to the national economy. FAO states that“general trends are probably reliably reflected by the availablestatistics…but the annual figures and the assessments involvea certain degree of uncertainty and small changes from year toyear are probably not statistically significant.” The quality of theaquaculture production estimates varies because many coun-tries lack the resources to adequately monitor landings withintheir borders.

These statistics provide a good overview of regional fish-eries trends. However, when reviewing the state of fisheriesstocks, evaluating food security, etc., these data should beused with caution and supplemented with estimates fromregional organizations, academic literature, expert consulta-tions, and trade data. For more information, please consultFishery Statistics: Reliability and Policy Implications, publishedby the FAO Fisheries Department and available on-line athttp://www.fao.org/fi/statist/nature_china/30jan02.asp.

Food Supply from Fish and Fishery Products and FishProtein as a Percent of Total Protein: Food supply as repre-sented here is different from actual consumption. Figures donot account for discards (including bones) and losses during

storage and preparation. Supply data should only be used toassess food security if it is combined with an analysis of foodavailability and accessibility. Per capita supply averages canalso mask disparate food availability within a particular coun-try. Nonetheless, the data are subject to “vigorous consistencychecks.” According to FAO, the food supply statistics, “whileoften far from satisfactory in the proper statistical sense, doprovide an approximate picture of the overall food situation in acountry and can be useful for economic and nutritional studies,for preparing development plans and for formulating relatedprojects.” For more information see Food Balance Sheets: AHandbook, maintained on-line by FAO at http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/003/X9892E/X9892E00.htm.

Number of Fishers: Numbers presented in this table are grossestimates. Many countries do not submit data on fishers, orsubmit incomplete information; therefore the quality of thesedata is poor. Apart from the gaps and the heavy presence ofestimates due to non-reporting, the information provided bynational statistical offices may not be strictly comparable sincedifferent definitions and methods are used in assessing thenumber of people engaged in fishing and aquaculture.

FAO recognizes that these statistics are incomplete and maynot accurately reflect the current level of employment in thefishing sector. Specifically, it is aware that some countriesfailed to report for several years. Those which report regularlyhave occasionally omitted fish farmers from the total orincluded subsistence and sport fishers as well as family mem-bers living on fishing.

Decked Fishery Vessels: As with the number of fishers, FAOrecognizes that these fleet statistics are incomplete and maynot accurately reflect current world fishing capacity. These datamay include vessels that are no longer in operation. The qualityof the estimates varies because many countries lack theresources to adequately monitor and report on fleet size. Forfurther information, please refer to the original source or toFishery Fleet Statistics, 1970, 1975, 1980, 1985, 1989–95, Bulletin ofFishery Statistics No. 35 (FAO, Rome, 1998).

SOURCESCatch, Aquaculture Production, and Trade in Fish andFishery Products: Fishery Information, Data and StatisticsUnit, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations(FAO). 2002. FISHSTAT Plus: Universal software for fishery sta-tistical time series, Version 2.3 Rome: FAO. Available on-line at:http://www.fao.org/fi/statist/FISOFT/FISHPLUS.asp.Food Supply Variables: Food and Agriculture Organization ofthe United Nations (FAO), FAOSTAT on-line statistical service.2002. Rome: FAO. Available on-line at: http://apps.fao.org.Data on the Number of Fishers: Food and Agriculture Orga-nization of the United Nations (FAO), Fishery Information,Data and Statistics Unit (FIDI) December, 1999. Number ofPeople within 100 km of the Coast: Center for InternationalEarth Science Information Network (CIESIN), World ResourcesInstitute, and International Food Policy Research Institute.2000. Gridded Population of the World, Version 2 alpha ColumbiaUniversity, Palisades, NY. Available on-line at: http://sedac.ciesin.org/plue/gwp. Population (used to calculate percapita values): Population Division of the Department of Eco-nomic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat.2002. World Population Prospects: The 2000 Revision. Data seton CD-ROM. New York: United Nations.

269P a r t I I : D a t a T a b l e s

Data Table 9 continued

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (43)

All Certifi-Annual Annual Annual Annual cation Average Percent Shrub- Savan- Herbaceous

Area % Change Area % Change Area % Change Area % Change Schemes Area of Total lands nas Grasslands(1000 ha) 1990- (1000 ha) 1990- (1000 ha) 1990- (1000 ha) 1998- (1000 ha) (1000 ha) Land

2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2002 2002 2000 1950-1981 Area 1992-93 1992-93 1992-93WORLD 3,869,455 (0.2) 3,682,722 .. 186,733 .. 27,227 30.9 80,717 5,060 .. 23,343 16,013 10,542ASIA (EXCL. MIDDLE EAST) 504,180 (0.1) 375,824 (0.1) 110,953 5.3 245 29.9 .. 1,078 .. 4,003 1,061 4,054Armenia 351 1.3 338 .. 13 .. 0 .. 0 3 98 1 4 2Azerbaijan 1,094 1.3 1,074 .. 20 .. 0 .. 0 7 84 9 2 4Bangladesh 1,334 1.3 709 (0.8) 625 4.4 0 .. 0 0 0 3 0 1Bhutan 3,016 .. 2,995 (0.0) 21 4.7 0 .. 0 0 0 3 0 4Cambodia 9,335 (0.6) 9,245 (0.6) 90 3.3 0 .. 0 0 0 4 3 0China 163,480 1.2 118,397 0.6 45,083 3.0 0 .. 0 318 34 1,829 415 1,815Georgia 2,988 .. 2,788 .. 200 .. 0 .. 0 2 34 5 2 1India 64,113 0.1 31,535 (3.8) 32,578 6.2 0 .. 0 185 60 285 246 26Indonesia 104,986 (1.2) 95,116 (1.5) 9,871 3.2 152 .. 72 5 3 1 111 48Japan 24,081 .. 13,399 .. 10,682 .. 6 .. 3 0 0 18 43 2Kazakhstan 12,148 2.2 12,143 .. 5 .. 0 .. 0 269 99 479 8 1,180Korea, Dem People's Rep 8,210 .. .. .. .. .. 0 .. 0 0 0 0 45 1Korea, Rep 6,248 (0.1) .. .. .. .. 0 .. 0 0 0 1 37 0Kyrgyzstan 1,003 2.6 946 .. 57 .. 0 .. 0 11 55 53 4 53Lao People's Dem Rep 12,561 (0.4) 12,507 (0.5) 54 .. 0 .. 0 0 0 2 6 0Malaysia 19,292 (1.2) 17,543 (1.4) 1,750 2.2 68 4.1 55 0 0 3 0 1Mongolia 10,645 (0.5) .. .. .. .. 0 .. 0 101 65 450 45 806Myanmar 34,419 (1.4) 33,598 (1.5) 821 5.9 0 .. 0 .. .. 8 43 2Nepal 3,900 (1.8) 3,767 (2.0) 133 5.1 0 .. 0 1 9 25 4 11Pakistan 2,361 (1.5) 1,381 (4.1) 980 3.7 0 .. 0 73 83 300 1 19Philippines 5,789 (1.4) 5,036 (2.1) 753 5.1 15 .. 15 0 0 0 0 0Singapore 2 .. .. .. .. .. 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 0Sri Lanka 1,940 (1.6) 1,625 (2.2) 316 1.5 5 .. 13 2 24 1 0 0Tajikistan 400 0.5 390 .. 10 .. 0 .. 0 6 40 50 1 18Thailand 14,762 (0.7) 9,842 (2.9) 4,920 6.1 0 .. 0 3 7 12 33 0Turkmenistan 3,755 .. 3,743 .. 12 .. 0 .. 0 47 100 259 0 35Uzbekistan 1,969 0.2 1,669 .. 300 .. 0 .. 0 44 99 187 0 22Viet Nam 9,819 0.5 8,108 (0.3) 1,711 6.3 0 .. 0 0 0 15 7 2EUROPE {c} 1,035,344 0.0 1,007,236 0.1 32,015 0.0 16,255 31.6 46,703 488 .. 3,650 686 715Albania 991 (0.8) 889 .. 102 .. 0 .. 0 0 0 0 1 0Austria 3,886 0.2 .. .. .. .. 0 .. 550 0 0 3 0 1Belarus 9,402 3.2 9,207 .. 195 .. 0 .. 0 .. .. 0 0 0Belgium {d} 728 (0.2) .. .. .. .. 4 .. .. 0 0 0 0 0Bosnia and Herzegovina 2,273 .. 2,216 .. 57 .. 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 0Bulgaria 3,690 0.6 2,722 .. 969 .. 0 .. 0 6 53 0 0 0Croatia 1,783 0.1 1,736 .. 47 .. 373 .. 167 0 0 0 1 0Czech Rep 2,632 .. .. .. .. .. 10 .. 10 1 13 0 0 0Denmark 455 0.2 114 .. 341 .. 0 .. .. 0 0 0 0 0Estonia 2,060 0.6 1,755 .. 305 .. 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 0Finland 21,935 .. .. .. .. .. 0 .. 21,900 0 0 15 0 3France 15,341 0.4 14,380 .. 961 .. 15 .. 1 0 0 6 5 2Germany 10,740 .. .. .. .. .. 418 55.2 3,242 2 5 0 0 1Greece 3,599 0.9 3,479 .. 120 .. 0 .. 0 6 45 15 8 1Hungary 1,840 0.4 1,704 .. 136 .. 0 .. 0 4 46 0 0 0Iceland 31 2.2 19 .. 12 .. 0 .. 0 .. .. 23 0 2Ireland 659 3.0 69 .. 590 .. 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 0Italy 10,003 0.3 9,870 .. 133 .. 11 0.0 11 6 21 47 2 3Latvia 2,923 0.4 2,780 .. 143 .. 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 0Lithuania 1,994 0.2 1,710 .. 284 .. 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 0Macedonia, FYR 906 .. 876 .. 30 .. 0 .. 0 1 37 0 0 0Moldova, Rep 325 0.2 324 .. 1 .. 0 .. 0 3 100 0 0 0Netherlands 375 0.3 275 .. 100 .. 103 .. 69 0 0 0 0 0Norway 8,868 0.4 8,568 .. 300 .. 0 .. 5,600 0 0 76 1 17Poland 9,047 0.2 9,008 .. 39 .. 3,592 16.1 2,743 6 19 0 0 0Portugal 3,666 1.7 2,832 .. 834 .. 0 .. 0 3 29 18 5 0Romania 6,448 0.2 6,357 .. 91 .. 0 .. 0 9 38 0 0 2Russian Federation 851,392 .. 834,052 .. 17,340 .. 216 .. 33 367 22 3,323 638 667Serbia and Montenegro 2,887 (0.1) 2,848 .. 39 .. 0 .. 0 .. .. 0 0 0Slovakia 2,177 0.9 2,162 .. 15 .. 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 0Slovenia 1,107 0.2 1,106 .. 1 .. 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 0Spain 14,370 0.6 12,466 .. 1,904 .. 0 .. 0 35 69 85 23 2Sweden 27,134 .. 26,565 .. 569 .. 10,130 35.8 11,167 0 0 34 0 4Switzerland 1,199 0.4 1,195 .. 4 .. 84 73.6 49 0 0 5 0 2Ukraine 9,584 0.3 5,159 .. 4,425 .. 238 .. 203 39 65 0 0 6United Kingdom 2,794 0.6 866 1.5 1,928 0.3 1,061 93.4 958 0 0 0 0 0MIDDLE EAST & N. AFRICA 29,104 0.2 20,448 .. 6,533 .. 0 .. .. 553 .. 2,476 76 596Afghanistan 1,351 .. .. .. .. .. 0 .. 0 60 94 310 0 161Algeria 2,145 1.3 1,427 (0.2) 718 5.3 0 .. 0 49 21 192 2 10Egypt 72 3.3 0 0.0 72 3.3 0 .. 0 8 8 6 3 4Iran, Islamic Rep 7,299 .. 5,015 (1.2) 2,284 3.2 0 .. 0 147 90 567 10 225Iraq 799 .. 789 (0.0) 10 2.7 0 .. 0 44 100 166 4 4Israel 132 4.9 41 .. 91 .. 0 .. 0 1 69 7 0 0Jordan 86 .. 41 (1.5) 45 1.6 0 .. 0 6 72 46 0 0Kuwait 5 3.5 0 .. 5 3.4 0 .. 0 2 92 4 0 0Lebanon 36 (0.4) 34 .. 2 .. 0 .. 0 1 59 2 0 2Libyan Arab Jamahiriya 358 1.4 190 0.0 168 3.3 0 .. 0 37 23 34 0 2Morocco 3,025 .. 2,491 (0.4) 534 2.0 0 .. 0 37 92 155 1 15Oman 1 5.3 0 (17.3) 1 5.1 0 .. 0 4 14 43 0 0Saudi Arabia 1,504 .. 1,500 0.0 4 4.8 0 .. 0 46 24 532 0 0Syrian Arab Rep 461 .. 232 (6.9) 229 .. 0 .. 0 18 98 99 0 2Tunisia 510 0.2 308 (3.5) 202 11.7 0 .. 0 15 94 38 1 9Turkey 10,225 0.2 8,371 .. 1,854 .. 0 .. 0 60 77 46 55 160United Arab Emirates 321 2.8 7 .. 314 0.0 0 .. 0 0 0 6 0 0Yemen 449 (1.9) .. .. .. .. 0 .. 0 13 30 216 0 2

(1000 km2)

Drylands {a} Grassland AreaTotal Forest Natural Forest Plantations FSC {b} Certified

Forest Area Certified Forest Area

Data Table 10 Forests, Grasslands, and DrylandsSources: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), United Nations EnvironmentProgram—Global Resource Information Database, Global Land Cover Characteristics Database (GLCCD).

270W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 2 – 2 0 0 4

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (44)

All Certifi-Annual Annual Annual Annual cation Average Percent Shrub- Savan- Herbaceous

Area % Change Area % Change Area % Change Area % Change Schemes Area of Total lands nas Grasslands(1000 ha) 1990- (1000 ha) 1990- (1000 ha) 1998- (1000 ha) 1990- (1000 ha) (1000 ha) Land

2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2002 2002 2000 2000 1950-1981 Area 1992-93 1992-93 1992-93SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA 486,571 (0.9) 478,576 .. 6,210 .. 1,070 30.5 974 1,121 .. 2,513 7,749 1,830Angola 69,756 (0.2) 69,615 (0.2) 141 0.1 0 .. 0 24 19 43 537 35Benin 2,650 (2.3) 2,538 (2.5) 112 1.0 0 .. 0 10 88 0 109 0Botswana 12,427 (0.9) 12,426 (0.9) 1 4.1 0 .. 0 58 100 127 97 226Burkina Faso 7,089 (0.2) 7,023 (0.3) 67 11.3 0 .. 0 27 100 2 199 31Burundi 94 (9.0) 21 (21.9) 73 3.4 0 .. 0 0 0 1 4 0Cameroon 23,858 (0.9) 23,778 (0.9) 80 0.3 0 .. 0 6 13 0 202 2Central African Rep 22,907 (0.1) 22,903 .. 4 .. 0 .. 0 12 20 0 473 0Chad 12,692 (0.6) 12,678 (0.6) 14 2.5 0 .. 0 87 68 68 445 120Congo 22,060 (0.1) 21,977 (0.1) 83 11.5 0 .. 0 0 0 0 91 2Congo, Dem Rep 135,207 (0.4) 135,110 (0.4) 97 0.1 0 .. 0 1 0 7 493 4Côte d'Ivoire 7,117 (3.1) 6,933 (3.3) 184 2.9 0 .. 0 .. .. 0 201 0Equatorial Guinea 1,752 (0.6) .. .. .. .. 0 .. 0 0 0 0 3 0Eritrea 1,585 (0.3) 1,563 (0.5) 22 .. 0 .. 0 10 83 25 29 15Ethiopia 4,593 (0.8) 4,377 (0.9) 216 1.0 0 .. 0 65 58 410 347 57Gabon 21,826 .. 21,790 .. 36 .. 0 .. .. 0 0 1 48 2Gambia 481 1.0 479 .. 2 .. 0 .. 0 1 97 0 5 0Ghana 6,335 (1.7) 6,259 (1.8) 76 2.5 0 .. 0 16 66 0 154 0Guinea 6,929 (0.5) 6,904 (0.5) 25 7.4 0 .. 0 3 14 0 205 0Guinea-Bissau 2,187 (0.9) 2,186 .. 2 .. 0 .. 0 0 6 1 24 0Kenya 17,096 (0.5) 16,865 (0.5) 232 0.9 0 .. 0 40 68 221 152 19Lesotho 14 .. 0 .. 14 .. 0 .. 0 0 0 0 13 9Liberia 3,481 (2.0) 3,363 (2.0) 119 0.1 0 .. 0 0 0 0 24 1Madagascar 11,727 (0.9) 11,378 (1.0) 350 1.7 0 .. 0 14 23 1 333 43Malawi 2,562 (2.4) 2,450 (2.6) 112 1.5 0 .. 0 0 0 1 43 0Mali 13,186 (0.7) 13,172 (0.7) 15 6.6 0 .. 0 101 80 138 304 126Mauritania 317 (2.7) 293 (3.5) 25 .. 0 .. 0 47 46 56 10 71Mozambique 30,601 (0.2) 30,551 (0.2) 50 1.5 0 .. 0 30 38 4 283 3Namibia 8,040 (0.9) 8,040 .. 0 .. 61 .. 54 75 91 356 86 168Niger 1,328 (3.7) 1,256 (4.1) 73 4.2 0 .. 0 74 62 149 42 253Nigeria 13,517 (2.6) 12,824 (2.8) 693 4.0 0 .. 0 53 58 1 662 17Rwanda 307 (3.9) 46 (15.2) 261 0.6 0 .. 0 0 0 4 4 0Senegal 6,205 (0.7) 5,942 (0.9) 263 5.3 0 .. 0 19 94 17 97 31Sierra Leone 1,055 (2.9) 1,049 .. 6 .. 0 .. 0 0 0 0 27 0Somalia 7,515 (1.0) 7,512 .. 3 .. 0 .. 0 51 80 504 50 5South Africa 8,917 (0.1) 7,363 (0.3) 1,554 0.8 898 29.2 828 81 66 240 138 290Sudan 61,627 (1.4) 60,986 (1.5) 641 6.3 0 .. 0 168 67 84 1,029 178Tanzania, United Rep 38,811 (0.2) 38,676 .. 135 .. 0 .. 0 .. .. 26 168 65Togo 510 (3.4) 472 (3.8) 38 1.7 0 .. 0 2 34 0 50 0Uganda 4,190 (2.0) 4,147 (2.0) 43 3.6 0 .. 0 4 16 11 92 3Zambia 31,246 (2.4) 31,171 (2.4) 75 2.9 0 .. 0 12 16 3 355 9Zimbabwe 19,040 (1.5) 18,899 (1.6) 141 1.7 111 29.9 92 26 67 3 122 41NORTH AMERICA 470,564 0.1 209,755 0.1 16,238 0.8 5,860 27.4 30,489 547 .. 4,531 415 1,334Canada 244,571 .. .. .. .. .. 1,972 76.1 4,360 157 16 2,385 8 55United States 225,993 0.2 209,755 0.1 16,238 0.8 3,888 19.8 26,129 390 41 2,132 407 1,279C. AMERICA & CARIBBEAN 78,737 (1.1) 76,556 (1.2) 1,295 (0.5) 1,033 31.7 427 138 .. 437 348 333Belize 1,348 (2.3) 1,345 (2.4) 3 3.6 96 0.0 96 0 0 0 0 1Costa Rica 1,968 (0.8) 1,790 (1.4) 178 9.6 86 38.8 41 0 0 0 3 0Cuba 2,348 1.3 1,867 0.1 482 7.6 0 .. 0 1 11 0 19 8Dominican Rep 1,376 .. 1,346 (0.3) 30 .. 0 .. 0 0 5 0 6 6El Salvador 121 (4.6) 107 (6.1) 14 .. 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 0Guatemala 2,850 (1.7) 2,717 (2.2) 133 .. 312 64.8 100 0 0 0 3 6Haiti 88 (5.7) 68 (7.6) 20 5.1 0 .. 0 0 3 0 3 5Honduras 5,383 (1.0) 5,335 (1.1) 48 .. 14 11.1 20 0 0 0 5 2Jamaica 325 (1.5) 317 .. 9 .. 0 .. 0 0 31 0 1 1Mexico 55,205 (1.1) 54,938 (1.1) 267 .. 516 36.6 169 136 69 436 293 301Nicaragua 3,278 (3.0) 3,232 (3.2) 46 14.3 0 .. 0 0 0 0 4 0Panama 2,876 (1.6) 2,836 (1.8) 40 17.3 8 87.2 1 0 0 0 6 1Trinidad and Tobago 259 (0.8) 244 .. 15 .. 0 .. 0 0 4 0 0 0SOUTH AMERICA {c} 885,618 (0.4) 875,163 (0.5) 10,455 6.7 2,110 30.3 1,551 444 .. 1,674 3,168 1,101Argentina 34,648 (0.8) 33,722 (1.1) 926 .. 0 .. 0 147 53 746 324 541Bolivia 53,068 (0.3) 53,022 (0.3) 46 3.7 927 35.7 885 .. .. 219 279 66Brazil 543,905 (0.4) 538,924 (0.4) 4,982 3.2 1,183 26.9 666 131 15 251 1,751 116Chile 15,536 (0.1) 13,519 (0.8) 2,017 5.5 0 .. 0 16 21 105 23 87Colombia 49,601 (0.4) 49,460 (0.4) 141 6.2 0 .. 0 20 17 47 182 45Ecuador 10,557 (1.2) 10,390 (1.3) 167 2.4 0 .. 0 16 63 43 29 17Guyana 16,879 (0.3) 16,867 .. 12 .. 0 .. 0 0 0 2 13 2Paraguay 23,372 (0.5) 23,345 (0.5) 27 11.3 0 .. 0 22 55 0 247 11Peru 65,215 (0.4) 64,575 (0.5) 640 15.2 0 .. 0 48 37 240 44 134Suriname 14,113 .. 14,100 0.0 13 0.8 0 .. 0 0 0 0 2 0Uruguay 1,292 5.0 670 0.0 622 16.3 0 .. 0 0 0 0 4 66Venezuela 49,506 (0.4) 48,643 (0.5) 863 8.7 0 .. 0 45 49 21 267 18OCEANIA 201,271 (0.2) 194,718 (0.2) 2,848 0.6 654 91.9 410 661 .. 4,023 2,505 567Australia 154,539 (0.2) 153,496 .. 1,043 .. 0 .. 0 661 86 4,007 2,397 411Fiji 815 (0.2) 718 (1.4) 97 29.3 .. .. 0 0 0 0 0 0New Zealand 7,946 0.5 6,404 .. 1,542 .. 610 111.6 363 0 0 0 44 122Papua New Guinea 30,601 (0.4) 30,511 (0.4) 90 5.9 4 0.0 4 0 1 13 56 32Solomon Islands 2,536 (0.2) 2,486 (0.2) 50 2.2 39 .. 43 0 0 2 5 0DEVELOPED 1,725,231 0.1 1,377,765 .. 63,695 .. 23,630 30.9 78,386 2,168 .. 13,483 3,745 4,190DEVELOPING 1,962,481 (0.5) 1,817,491 (0.2) 122,764 4.4 3,597 31.1 2,326 2,862 .. 9,825 12,263 6,341a. Drylands area is determined using aridity zones; arid, semi-arid and dry sub-humid zones are included. Hyper-arid (bare sand deserts) are excluded. b. Forest Stewardship Council.c. Regional totals are from the original source and are not calculated by WRI. d. Belgium includes Luxembourg.

(1000 km2)

Drylands {a} Grassland AreaTotal Forest Natural Forest Plantations FSC {b} Certified

Forest Area Certified Forest Area

271P a r t I I : D a t a T a b l e s

Data Table 10 continuedMore Forests, Grasslands, and Drylands data tables are available. Log on to http://earthtrends.wri.org/datatables/forests orsend an e-mail to [emailprotected] with “Instructions” in the message body.

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (45)

VARIABLE DEFINITIONS AND METHODOLOGYFAO Total Forest Area includes both natural forests andplantations, which are determined by the presence of trees andthe absence of other predominant land uses, such as agro-forestry. Data are presented in thousands of hectares. TotalForests are areas where tree crowns cover over 10 percent ofthe ground, and cover areas greater than 0.5 hectares. Treeheight at maturity should exceed 5 meters. Natural Forestsare forests composed primarily of indigenous (native) treespecies. Plantations are forest stands established artificiallyby afforestation and reforestation, and can include either nonnative or indigenous (native) trees. Reforestation does notinclude regeneration of old tree crops.

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) published theGlobal Forest Resources Assessment 2000 (FRA 2000) inresponse to international interest in a global forest assessmentwith a single definition of forest cover. FAO compiles countryinformation to create one internationally comparable database,and national data gathering methodologies can be found athttp://www.fao.org/forestry/fo/fra/index.jsp.

Forest statistics are based primarily on forest inventoryinformation provided by national governments. FAO harmo-nized these national assessments with the 10-percent forestdefinition mentioned above. In tropical regions, national inven-tories are supplemented by a remote sensing survey. FAO ana-lyzed high resolution Landsat satellite data from a number ofsample sites covering a total of 10 percent of the tropical forestzone. Where only limited or outdated inventory data were avail-able, FAO used linear projections and expert opinion to fill indata gaps. If no forest statistics existed for 1990 and 2000, FAOprojected forward or backward in time to estimate forest areain the two reference years.

World Resources Institute (WRI) staff used data from theFRA 2000 to estimate natural forest and plantation area for1990 and to calculate the rate of change from 1990 to 2000. FAO,assuming a fixed rate of tree planting for each country, com-piled country data from various years and extrapolated forwardto the year 2000. WRI reversed this approach and extrapolatedbackward from 2000 to 1990 by subtracting tree planting rates.Plantations area was then subtracted from total forest area tocalculate natural forest area. Countries where this methodol-ogy resulted in a negative plantations area in 1990 wereassigned a value of “..” (no data available). Rates of change forthe decade were calculated using an exponential growth rateequation.

Certified Forest Area, expressed in thousands of hectares,includes forests certified by major forest certification schemes.Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) Certified Forestsinclude all natural forests, plantations, and mixed and semi-natural forests certified as managed in accordance with the tenFSC principles and criteria. The FSC certifies forests as natu-ral forests when most of the principal characteristics and keyelements of the native ecosystems, such as complexity, struc-ture, and diversity are still present. Forests are certified asplantations when they are the result of human activities andlack most of the principal characteristics and key elements ofnative ecosystems. According to FSC, certified plantationsshould decrease the pressures on natural forests; representdiverse species and age classes; preferentially choose nativeover exotic species; improve soil function, fertility and struc-ture; and have a portion of their area managed for the restora-tion of natural forest cover. Semi-natural and mixed forest areaincludes mixed areas of natural forest and plantations. FullFSC certification involves two steps. First, the site is assessedfor sustainability. Second, a chain of custody is traced from for-est, to processor, to distributors, to the final consumer toensure that only wood from the certified forests are being soldand delivered as FSC-certified.

For a complete list of the Principles and Criteria, please referto Document 1.2 at http://www.fscoax.org/principal.htm.

Forest Area Certified by All Certification Schemes aggre-gates the total area of forests certified by international,regional, and national forest certification schemes, and isreported in thousands of hectares. Certifications by ISO 14000are not included. The only, or primary, certifier in most countrieswith active certification programs is the Forest StewardshipCouncil (FSC). Other certification bodies include the AmericanTree Farm Program (ATFP), Canadian Standards Association(CSA), Green Tag (GT), Pan-European Forest Certification(PEFC), and the Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) of theAmerican Forest and Paper Association (AFPA). Data arecompiled by FAO.

Drylands Area is the terrestrial area, in thousands of hectares,that falls within three of the world’s six aridity zones—the arid,semi-arid, and dry sub-humid zones—as a percent of Earth’stotal terrestrial area. This definition of drylands has beenadopted by the United Nations Convention to Combat Deserti-fication (UNCCD) to identify areas where efforts combatingland degradation should be focused and where methods forattaining sustainable development should be promoted.

The world is divided into six aridity zones based on the arid-ity index—the ratio of mean annual precipitation (PPT) tomean annual potential evapotranspiration (PET). Drylands ofconcern to the CCD include those lands with an aridity indexbetween .05 and .65 (excluding polar and sub-polar regions).Ratios of less than .05 indicate hyperarid zones, or true deserts.Ratios of 0.65 or greater identify humid zones. The areas withan aridity index between .05 and .65 encompasses the arid,semi-arid, and dry sub-humid areas. See the UNCCD’s websiteat http://www.unccd.int/main.php for more information.

Climatic data from 1950 to 1981 were used to define aridityzone boundaries for the globe with a resolution of about 50 km.The amount of land within each aridity zone for individual coun-tries was calculated by WRI.

Grasslands Area includes five categories under the Interna-tional Geosphere- Biosphere Programme (IGBP) as classifiedby the Global Land Cover Classification Database (GLCCD).Data are reported in thousands of square kilometers. Shrub-lands is the combination of IGBP’s closed and open shrub-lands categories; Savannas is IGBP’s savannas and woodysavannas; Herbaceous Grasslands is the IGBP grasslandclassification.

The Global Land Cover Classification team describes themethod used to classify vegetation types as a “multitempo-ral unsupervised classification of NDVI data with post-classification refinement using multi-source earth sciencedata.” NDVI data are a measure of “greenness” derived fromsatellite data. The satellite data in this study were from theAdvanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR), andhave a resolution of 1 X 1 km. Other data sets used were a digi-tal elevation model to help define ecological factors that gov-ern natural vegetation distribution, ecoregions data, and mapsof soils, vegetation, and land cover. For a description of thefive-step classification process, please see technical notesavailable at http://earthtrends.wri.org/searchable_db/variablenotes_static.cfm?varid=750&themeid=9.

FREQUENCY OF UPDATE BY DATA PROVIDERSFAO forestry data is compiled each decade; data in this tableare from the 2000 assessment. FRA 2000 uses different defini-tions for total forest area than FRA 1990; the data from thesetwo volumes cannot be directly compared. Certified ForestArea data are updated periodically. WRI has compiled data

272W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 2 – 2 0 0 4

Data Table 10 continued

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (46)

from these periodic updates to cover a five-year time span. Themost recent data are up-to-date as of June 30, 2002. Data from1998 were captured on December 31 of that year. Drylands datawere prepared in 1991. Raw data for Grassland area estimateswere recorded from April 1992 to March 1993. Data were classi-fied, refined, and released in a database version 2.0 in 2001.

DATA RELIABILITY AND CAUTIONARY NOTESFAO’s FRA 2000 Forest Extent and Change Data: FAOacknowledges that the quality of primary data available on trop-ical forest resources remains very poor. The accuracy ofnational estimates provided to FAO is affected by two majorsources of error. First, in most tropical countries, forests arenot monitored comprehensively or frequently enough to maptheir extent accurately or to track their rate of change. In theabsence of inventory data for specific dates (1990 and 2000),FAO’s latest estimates of forest area and change over time areoften based on projections and expert opinion and thus remaineducated guesses. Just one or two satellite scenes appear tohave been the prime source of new information for some coun-tries with very poor inventory data. Second, estimates of openwoodland areas are far less accurate than those of closed for-est because it is difficult to monitor woodlands by remote sens-ing techniques, and government forestry agencies tend not tosurvey them as part of normal forest inventories. Differences indefinitions used among countries further complicate this issue.The quality of data from developed countries is generally bet-ter than from developing countries, but problems still arise withestimates because of differences in national forestry defini-tions and systems of measurement, and the use of different ref-erence periods. In Northern countries, the boundary betweenforest and tundra is vague, and the additional forest that shouldbe counted under the new (globally harmonized) 10-percentcrown cover threshold proved difficult to quantify. Non-produc-tion forests are classified as “other wooded land” in FRA 2000,even though many of them appear to meet the FAO definition offorests. This results in significant underreporting in some coun-tries. For a more complete discussion of some data reliabilityissues associated with the FRA 2000, please see:http://www.wri.org/wri/forests/fra2000.html.

WRI-calculated natural and plantation forest area:Thesedata are based on the FRA 2000 and are subject to all the con-cerns those data raise. Moreover, the calculations are based onassumptions of linear change that are not supported by fieldresearch. WRI chose to make this calculation and present thedata despite FAO’s decision not to include them in the FRA2000. These data represent the only available indicators of for-est change based on consistent definitions. However, the datashould be used as very rough approximations.

Certified Forest Area: The certification schemes are eitherperformance-based or systems-based. Performance-based cer-tification requires that landowners meet performance criteriaset by the certification body. Systems-based schemes requirethat landowners manage the forest within broad system compo-nents. While there is some disagreement about which schemebest guarantees sustainable forestry, many groups feel thatthose using performance-based criteria carry the most weight.

More information on certification is available at: http://eesc.orst.edu/agcomwebfile/edmat/EC1518.pdf. While the num-bers reported are reliable, it is worth noting that certifiedforests do not represent the total area of well-managed forests.Many uncertified forests are under sound management.Increasing trends in forest certification indicate the importancethat consumers attach to forest management issues ratherthan the total area of well-managed forests.

Drylands:The accuracy of land area totals is limited by the 50kilometer resolution of the data set. The climate data set wasderived from a limited number of field observations. Actualboundaries between aridity zones are neither abrupt nor static,making delineated borders somewhat artificial. The data shouldtherefore be considered useful as a general indicator of theextent of drylands within each country, rather than as an exactdepiction of the climatic situation on the ground.

Alternative methods for measuring extent of drylands areainclude use of soil moisture and agricultural production sys-tems, although these methods may also be subject to similarproblems such as low resolution data, limited field observa-tions, and subjectivity when delineating exact boundaries onthe ground.

Grasslands area: Following publication of the GLCC databaseversion 1, a number of scientific teams assessed its accuracyby comparing the results with higher-resolution satelliteimagery. These teams found that the accuracy of the GLCC’sapproach was in a range from 60 to nearly 80 percent—meaningthat the assessment teams’ classification of a given areaagreed with the GLCC’s classification between 60 and 80 per-cent of the time. Given the relatively high level of potential formisclassification, the area of land in each classification shouldbe treated as estimated rather than an exact interpretation ofthe earth’s surface.

SOURCESFAO Forest Area Variables and All Certification Schemes:Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations(FAO). 2001. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000—MainReport. FAO Forestry Paper No. 140. Rome: FAO. Data can alsobe obtained electronically at: http://www.fao.org/forestry/fo/fra/index.jsp. FSC-certified Forests: Forest StewardshipCouncil (FSC). 1998, 2002. Forests Certified by FSC-AccreditedCertification Bodies. Document 5.3.3. Oaxaca, Mexico, FSC.Available on-line at: http://www.fscoax.org/principal.htm.Drylands: U. Deichmann and L. Eklundh. 1991. Global digitaldata sets for land degradation studies: a GIS approach. UnitedNations Environment Program/Global Resource InformationDatabase (UNEP/GRID) GRID Case Study Series No. 4.,Nairobi, Kenya. Grasslands area:T.R. Loveland, B.C. Reed, J.F.Brown, D.O. Ohlen, Z. Zhu, L. Yang, J. Merchant. 2000. GlobalLand Cover Characteristics Database (GLCCD) Version 2.0.Available on-line at: http://edcdaac.usgs.gov/glcc/globdoc2_0.html. Loveland, T.R., B.C. Reed, J.F. Brown, D.O.Ohlen, Z. Zhu, L. Yang, and J.W. Merchant. 2000. “Developmentof a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DIS-Cover from 1-km AVHRR data.” International Journal of RemoteSensing 21: 1303–1330.

273P a r t I I : D a t a T a b l e s

Data Table 10 continued

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (47)

as a % DesalinatedGround- Sur- Per of Renew- Water

water face Over- Per Capita Total Capita able ProductionRecharge Water lap Total {d} Total (m3 per (million (m3 per Water Agri- Dom- Indus- (million (km3) {e} (km3) {e} (km3) (km3) (km3) person) {f} Year m3) person) Resources culture estic try m3) {g}

WORLD 11,358 40,594 10,067 43,219 .. .. 1990 3,414,000 650 .. 71 9 20 ..ASIA (EXCL. MIDDLE EAST) 2,472 10,985 2,136 11,321 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Armenia 4.2 6.3 1.4 9.1 11 2,778 1994 2,925 784 28 66 30 4 0Azerbaijan 6.5 6.0 4.4 8.1 30 3,716 1995 16,533 2,151 58 70 5 25 0Bangladesh 21 84 0 105 1,211 8,444 1990 14,636 133 2 86 12 2 0Bhutan .. 95 .. 95 95 43,214 1987 20 13 0 54 36 10 0Cambodia 18 116 13 121 476 34,561 1987 520 60 0 94 5 1 0China 829 2,712 728 2,812 2,830 2,186 1993 525,489 439 20 78 5 18 0Georgia 17 57 16 58 63 12,149 1990 3,468 635 5 59 21 20 0India 419 1,222 380 1,261 1,897 h 1,822 h 1990 500,000 592 32 92 5 3 0Indonesia 455 2,793 410 2,838 2,838 13,046 1990 74,346 407 3 93 6 1 0Japan 27 420 17 430 430 3,372 1992 91,400 735 22 64 19 17 0Kazakhstan 6.1 69 0 75 110 6,839 1993 33,674 2,010 29 81 2 17 1,328Korea, Dem People's Rep 13 66 12 67 77 3,415 1987 14,160 742 22 73 11 16 0Korea, Rep 13 62 11 65 70 1,471 1994 23,668 531 36 63 26 11 0Kyrgyzstan 14 44 11 46 21 h 4,078 h 1994 10,086 2,231 55 94 3 3 0Lao People's Dem Rep 38 190 38 190 334 60,318 1987 990 259 0 82 8 10 0Malaysia 64 566 50 580 580 25,178 1995 12,733 636 3 77 11 13 0Mongolia 6.1 33 4.0 35 35 13,451 1993 428 182 1 53 20 27 0Myanmar 156 875 150 881 1,046 21,358 1987 3,960 103 0 90 7 3 0Nepal 20 198 20 198 210 8,703 1994 28,953 1,451 17 99 1 0 0Pakistan 55 47 50 52 223 h 2,812 h 1991 155,600 1,382 100 97 2 2 0Philippines 180 444 145 479 479 6,093 1995 55,422 811 13 88 8 4 0Singapore .. .. .. .. .. .. 1975 .. .. .. 4 45 51 ..Sri Lanka 7.8 49 7.0 50 50 2,592 1990 9,770 574 22 96 2 2 0Tajikistan 6.0 63 3.0 66 16 h 2,587 h 1994 11,874 2,096 81 92 3 4 0Thailand 42 199 31 210 410 6,371 1990 33,132 605 10 91 5 4 0Turkmenistan 0.4 1.0 0 1.4 25 h 5,015 h 1994 23,779 5,801 116 98 1 1 0Uzbekistan 8.8 9.5 2 16 50 h 1,968 h 1994 58,051 2,598 132 94 4 2 0Viet Nam 48 354 35 367 891 11,109 1990 54,330 822 7 87 4 10 0EUROPE 1,318 6,223 986 6,590 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Albania 6.2 23 2.4 27 42 13,178 1995 1,400 440 3 71 29 0 ..Austria 6.0 55 6.0 55 78 9,629 1991 2,360 303 3 9 33 58 ..Belarus 18 37 18 37 58 5,739 1990 2,734 266 5 35 22 43 0Belgium 0.9 12 0.9 12 18 1,781 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Bosnia and Herzegovina .. .. .. 36 38 9,088 1995 1,000 292 3 60 30 10 ..Bulgaria 6.4 20 5.5 21 21 2,734 1988 13,900 1,573 58 22 3 75 ..Croatia 11 27 0.5 38 106 22,654 1996 764 164 1 0 50 50 ..Czech Rep 1.4 13 1.4 13 13 1,283 1991 2,740 266 21 2 41 57 ..Denmark 4.3 3.7 2.0 6.0 6 1,123.0 1990 1,200 233 21 43 30 27 ..Estonia 4.0 12 3.0 13 13 9,413 1995 158 106 1 5 56 39 0Finland 2.2 107 2.0 107 110 21,223 1991 2,200 439 2 3 12 85 ..France 100 177 98 179 204 3,414 1999 32,300 547 16 10 18 72 ..Germany 46 106 45 107 154 1,878 1991 46,270 579 31 20 11 69 ..Greece 10 56 7.8 58 74 6,984 1997 8,700 826 12 87 10 3 ..Hungary 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 104 10,541 1991 6,810 659 6 36 9 55 ..Iceland 24 166 20 170 170 599,944 1991 160 622 0 6 31 63 ..Ireland 11 48 10 49 52 13,408 1980 790 232 2 10 16 74 ..Italy 43 171 31 183 191 3,330 1998 42,000 730 22 48 19 34 ..Latvia 2.2 17 2.0 17 35 14,820 1994 285 112 1 13 55 32 0Lithuania 1.2 15 1.0 16 25 6,763 1995 254 68 1 3 81 16 0Macedonia, FYR .. 5.4 .. 5.4 6 3,120.6 1996 1,850 936 30 74 12 15 ..Moldova, Rep 0.4 1.0 0.4 1.0 12 2,726 1992 2,963 678 25 26 9 65 0Netherlands 4.5 11 4.5 11 91 5,691 1991 7,810 519 9 34 5 61 ..Norway 96 376 90 382 382 84,787 1985 2,030 489 1 8 20 72 ..Poland 13 53 12 54 62 1,598 1991 12,280 321 20 11 13 76 ..Portugal 4.0 38 4.0 38 69 h 6,837 h 1990 7,290 736 11 48 15 37 ..Romania 8.3 42 8.0 42 212 9,486 1994 26,000 1,141 12 59 8 33 ..Russian Federation 788 4,037 i 512 4,313 i 4,507 i 31,354 i 1994 77,100 519 2 20 19 62 0Serbia and Montenegro 3.0 42 1.4 44 209 19,815 1995 13,000 1,233 6 8 6 86 ..Slovakia 1.7 13 1.7 13 50 9,265 1991 1,780 337 4 .. .. .. ..Slovenia 14 19 13 19 32 16,070 1996 1,280 642 4 1 20 80 ..Spain 30 110 28 111 112 2,793 1997 35,210 884 32 68 13 19 ..Sweden 20 170 19 171 174 19,721 1991 2,930 340 2 9 36 55 ..Switzerland 2.5 40 2.5 40 54 7,464 1991 1,190 172 2 4 23 73 ..Ukraine 20 50 17 53 140 2,868 1992 25,991 500 17 30 18 52 0United Kingdom 9.8 144 9.0 145 147 2,464 1991 11,790 204 8 3 20 77 ..MIDDLE EAST & N. AFRICA 149 374 60 518 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Afghanistan .. .. .. 55 65 2,790 1987 26,110 2,007 72 99 1 0 0Algeria 1.7 13 1.0 14 14 460 1995 5,000 181 39 52 34 14 64Egypt 1.3 0.5 0 1.8 58 h 830 h 1996 66,000 1,055 127 82 7 11 25Iran, Islamic Rep 49 97 18 129 138 1,900 1993 70,034 1,122 59 92 6 2 2.9Iraq 1.2 34 0 35 75 h 3,111 h 1990 42,800 2,478 80 92 3 5 0Israel 0.5 0.3 0 0.8 2 265.0 1997 1,620 287 108 54 39 7 ..Jordan 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.7 1 169.4 1993 984 255 151 75 22 3 2.0Kuwait 0 0 0 0 0.02 9.9 1994 538 306 3,097 60 37 2 231Lebanon 3.2 4.1 2.5 4.8 4 h 1,219.5 h 1996 1,300 400 33 68 27 6 0Libyan Arab Jamahiriya 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.6 1 108.5 1999 4,500 870 801 84 13 3 70Morocco 10 22 3.0 29 29 936 1998 11,480 399 43 89 10 2 3.4Oman 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 1 363.6 1991 1,223 658 181 94 5 2 34Saudi Arabia 2.2 2.2 2.0 2.4 2 110.6 1992 17,018 1,056 955 90 9 1 714Syrian Arab Rep 4.2 4.8 2.0 7.0 26 h 1,541 h 1995 12,000 844 55 90 8 2 0Tunisia 1.5 3.1 0.4 4.2 5 576.5 1996 2,830 312 54 86 13 1 8.3Turkey 69 186 28 227 229 h 3,344 h 1997 35,500 558 17 73 16 12 0.5United Arab Emirates 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0 55.5 1995 2,108 896 1,614 67 24 9 385Yemen 1.5 4.0 1.4 4.1 4 205.9 1990 2,932 253 123 92 7 1 10

Sectoral ShareResources {b}

Water Withdrawals (annual)

(percent) {c}

Renewable Water Resources (annual) {a}

Water Resources (IRWR)Internal Renewable Natural

Renewable Water

Data Table 11 Freshwater ResourcesSources: AQUASTAT Information System on Water and Agriculture, The Blue Plan: Environment and Development in MediterraneanCountries

274W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 2 – 2 0 0 4

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (48)

as a % DesalinatedGround- Sur- Per of Renew- Water

water face Over- Per Capita Total Capita able ProductionRecharge Water lap Total {d} Total (m3 per (million (m3 per Water Agri- Dom- Indus- (million (km3) {e} (km3) {e} (km3) (km3) (km3) person) {f} Year m3) person) Resources culture estic try m3) {g}

SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA 1,549 3,812 1,468 3,901 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Angola 72 182 70 184 184 13,203 1987 480 54 0 76 14 10 0Benin 1.8 10 1.5 10 25 3,741 1994 145 27 1 67 23 10 0Botswana 1.7 1.7 0.5 2.9 14 9,209 1992 113 86 1 48 32 20 0Burkina Faso 9.5 8.0 5.0 13 13 1,024 1992 376 40 4 81 19 0 0Burundi 2.1 3.5 2.0 3.6 4 538.3 1987 100 19 4 64 36 0 0Cameroon 100 268 95 273 286 18,378 1987 400 38 0 35 46 19 0Central African Rep 56 141 56 141 144 37,565 1987 70 25 0 74 21 5 0Chad 12 14 10 15 43 5,125 1987 180 34 1 82 16 2 0Congo 198 222 198 222 832 259,547 1987 40 20 0 11 62 27 0Congo, Dem Rep 421 899 420 900 1,283 23,639 1990 357 10 0 23 61 16 0Côte d'Ivoire 38 74 35 77 81 4,853 1987 709 62 1 67 22 11 0Equatorial Guinea 10 25 9.0 26 26 53,841 1987 10 30 0 6 81 13 0Eritrea .. .. .. 2.8 6 1,577.7 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 0Ethiopia 40 110 40 110 110 1,666 1987 2,200 51 3 86 11 3 0Gabon 62 162 60 164 164 126,789 1987 60 70 0 6 72 22 0Gambia 0.5 3.0 0.5 3.0 8 5,836.0 1982 20 29 1 91 7 2 0Ghana 26 29 25 30 53 2,637 1970 300 35 1 52 35 13 0Guinea 38 226 38 226 226 26,964 1987 740 132 0 87 10 3 0Guinea-Bissau 14 12 10 16 31 24,670 1991 17 17 0 36 60 4 0Kenya 3.0 17 0 20 30 947 1990 2,050 87 9 76 20 4 0Lesotho 0.5 5.2 0.5 5.2 3 h 1,455.6 h 1987 50 32 2 56 22 22 0Liberia 60 200 60 200 232 70,348 1987 130 59 0 60 27 13 0Madagascar 55 332 50 337 337 19,925 1984 16,300 1,611 8 99 1 .. 0Malawi 1.4 16 1.4 16 17 1,461 1994 936 95 6 86 10 3 0Mali 20 50 10 60 100 8,320 1987 1,360 167 2 97 2 1 0Mauritania 0.3 0.1 0 0.4 11 4,029 1985 1,630 923 23 92 6 2 1.7Mozambique 17 97 15 99 216 11,382 1992 605 42 0 89 9 2 0Namibia 2.1 4.1 0.04 6.2 18 h 9,865 h 1991 249 175 2 68 29 3 0Niger 2.5 1.0 0 3.5 34 2,891 1988 500 69 2 82 16 2 0Nigeria 87 214 80 221 286 2,384 1987 3,630 46 2 54 31 15 0Rwanda 3.6 5.2 3.6 5.2 5 638.2 1993 768 141 22 94 5 2 0Senegal 7.6 24 5.0 26 39 3,977 1987 1,360 202 5 92 5 3 0Sierra Leone 50 150 40 160 160 33,237 1987 370 98 0 89 7 4 0Somalia 3.3 5.7 3.0 6.0 14 1,413 1987 810 119 8 97 3 0 0.1South Africa 4.8 43 3.0 45 50 1,131 1990 13,309 366 32 72 17 11 0Sudan 7.0 28 5.0 30 65 h 1,981 h 1995 17,800 637 32 94 4 1 0.4Tanzania, United Rep 30 80 28 82 91 2,472 1994 1,165 39 2 89 9 2 0Togo 5.7 11 5.0 12 15 3,076 1987 91 29 1 25 62 13 0Uganda 29 39 29 39 66 2,663 1970 200 21 1 60 32 8 0Zambia 47 80 47 80 105 9,676 1994 1,706 190 2 77 16 7 0Zimbabwe 5.0 13 4.0 14 20 1,530 1987 1,220 131 9 79 14 7 0NORTH AMERICA 1,670 4,702 1,522 4,850 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Canada 370 2,840 360 2,850 2,902 92,810 1991 45,100 1,607 2 12 18 70 ..United States 1,300 j 1,862 j 1,162 j 2,800 3,051 10,574 1990 467,340 1,834 26 42 13 45 ..C. AMERICA & CARIBBEAN 359 1,050 231 1,186 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Belize .. .. .. 16 19 78,763 1993 95 485 1 0 12 88 0Costa Rica 37 75 0 112 112 26,764 1997 5,772 1,540 6 80 13 7 0Cuba 6.5 32 0 38 38 3,382 1995 5,211 475 14 51 49 0 0Dominican Rep 12 21 12 21 21 2,430 1994 8,339 1,102 45 89 11 0 0El Salvador 6.2 18 6 18 25 3,872 1992 729 137 4 46 34 20 0Guatemala 34 101 25 109 111 9,277 1992 1,158 126 1 74 9 17 0Haiti 2.2 11 .. 13 14 1,670 1991 980 139 8 94 5 1 0Honduras 39 87 30 96 96 14,250 1992 1,520 294 2 91 4 5 0Jamaica 3.9 5.5 0 9.4 9 3,587.5 1993 900 371 10 77 15 7 0Mexico 139 361 91 409 457 4,490 1998 77,812 812 18 78 17 5 0Nicaragua 59 186 55 190 197 36,784 1998 1,285 267 1 84 14 2 0Panama 21 144 18 147 148 50,299 1990 1,643 685 1 70 28 2 0Trinidad and Tobago .. .. .. 3.8 4 2,940.4 1997 297 233 8 6 68 26 0SOUTH AMERICA 3,693 12,198 3,645 12,246 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Argentina 128 276 128 276 814 21,453 1995 28,583 822 4 75 16 9 0Bolivia 130 277 104 304 623 71,511 1987 1,210 197 0 87 10 3 0Brazil 1,874 5,418 1,874 5,418 8,233 47,125 1992 54,870 359 1 61 21 18 0Chile 140 884 140 884 922 59,143 1987 20,289 1,629 3 84 5 11 0Colombia 510 2,112 510 2,112 2,132 49,017 1996 8,938 228 0 37 59 4 0Ecuador 134 432 134 432 432 32,948 1997 16,985 1,423 4 82 12 6 0Guyana 103 241 103 241 241 314,963 1992 1,460 1,993 1 99 1 1 0Paraguay 41 94 41 94 336 58,148 1987 430 112 0 78 15 7 0Peru 303 1,616 303 1,616 1,913 72,127 1992 18,973 849 1 86 7 7 0Suriname 80 88 80 88 122 289,848 1987 460 1,171 0 89 6 5 0Uruguay 23 59 23 59 139 41,065 1965 650 .. .. 91 6 3 0Venezuela 227 700 205 722 1,233 49,144 1970 4,100 382 1 46 44 10 0OCEANIA .. 1,241 20 1,693 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Australia 72 440 20 492 492 25,185 1985 14,600 933 4 33 65 2 ..Fiji .. .. .. 29 29 34,330 1987 30 42 0 60 20 20 ..New Zealand .. .. .. 327 327 85,221 1991 2,000 588 1 44 46 10 ..Papua New Guinea .. 801 .. 801 801 159,171 1987 100 29 0 49 29 22 0Solomon Islands .. .. .. 45 45 93,405 1987 .. .. .. 40 40 20 ..DEVELOPED 3,153 12,084 2,584 13,016 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..DEVELOPING 8,128 28,500 7,483 29,289 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..a. Although data were obtained from FAO in 2002, they are long-term averages originating from multiple sources and years. For more information, please consult the original source athttp://www.fao.org/waicent/faoinfo/agricult/agl/aglw/aquastat/water_res/index.stm. b. Natural Renewable Water Resources include Internal Renewable Water Resources plus or minus the flows of surface and groundwater entering or leaving the country. c. Sectoral withdrawal data may not add up to 100 because of rounding. d. At the country level, Total Internal Renewable Water Resources = Surface water + Groundwater - Overlap. Regional and global totals represent a sum of available country-level data. e. Groundwater and surface water cannot be added together to calculate total available water resources because of overlap--water that is counted in both the groundwater and surface water totals. f. Calculation is based on withdrawals from various years, and population datafrom 2002. g. Data on desalinated water originate from FAO country surveys conducted in various regions between 1992 and 2000. h. Data account for the portion of flow secured throughtreaties or agreements to other countries. i. River discharges in Siberia are not well documented and highly uncertain. j. Data are for the continental United States.

Resources {b} Sectoral Share(percent) {c}

Renewable Water Resources (annual) {a}Internal Renewable Natural Water Withdrawals (annual)

Water Resources (IRWR) Renewable Water

275P a r t I I : D a t a T a b l e s

Data Table 11 continuedMore data tables are available. Log on to http://earthtrends.wri.org/datatables/freshwater or send an e-mail [emailprotected] with “Instructions” in the message body.

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (49)

VARIABLE DEFINITIONS AND METHODOLOGYInternal Renewable Water Resources (IRWR) include theaverage annual flow of rivers and the recharge of groundwater(aquifers) generated from endogenous precipitation—precipi-tation occurring within a country’s borders. IRWR are meas-ured in cubic kilometers per year (km3/year).

Groundwater Recharge is the total volume of water enteringaquifers within a country’s borders from endogenous precipita-tion and surface water flow. Groundwater resources are esti-mated by measuring rainfall in arid areas where rainfall isassumed to infiltrate into aquifers. Where data are available,groundwater resources in humid areas have been considered asequivalent to the base flow of rivers.

Surface Water produced internally includes the averageannual flow of rivers generated from endogenous precipitationand base flow generated by aquifers. Surface water resourcesare usually computed by measuring or assessing total riverflow occurring in a country on a yearly basis.

Overlap is the volume of water resources common to both sur-face and groundwater. It is subtracted when calculating IRWRto avoid double counting. Two types of exchanges create over-lap: contribution of aquifers to surface flow, and recharge ofaquifers by surface run-off. In humid temperate or tropicalregions, the entire volume of groundwater recharge typicallycontributes to surface water flow. In karstic domains (regionswith porous limestone rock formations), a portion of ground-water resources are assumed to contribute to surface waterflow. In arid and semi-arid countries, surface water flowsrecharge groundwater by infiltrating through the soil duringfloods. This recharge is either directly measured or inferred bycharacteristics of the aquifers and piezometric levels.

Total Internal Renewable Water Resources is the sum ofsurface and groundwater resources minus overlap; in otherwords, IRWR = Surface Water Resources + GroundwaterRecharge – Overlap.

Natural Renewable Water Resources, measured in cubickilometers per year (km3/year), is the sum of internal renewablewater resources and natural flow originating outside of thecountry. Natural Renewable Water Resources are computed byadding together both internal renewable water resources(IRWR—see above) and natural flows (flow to and from othercountries). Natural incoming flow is the average amount ofwater which would flow into the country without human influ-ence. In some arid and semi-arid countries, actual waterresources are presented instead of natural renewable waterresources. These actual totals, labeled with a footnote in thefreshwater data table, include the quantity of flows reserved toupstream and downstream countries through formal and infor-mal agreements or treaties. The actual flows are often muchlower than natural flow due to water scarcity in arid and semi-arid regions.

Per Capita Natural Renewable Water Resources are meas-ured in cubic meters per person per year (m3/person/year). Percapita values were calculated by using national population datafor 2002. For more information about the collection methodologyand reliability of the UN data, please refer to the technicalnotes in the population data table.

Water Withdrawals (annual), measured in million cubicmeters, refers to total water removed for human uses in a sin-gle year, not counting evaporative losses from storage basins.Water withdrawals also include water from nonrenewablegroundwater sources, river flows from other countries, anddesalination plants.

Per Capita Annual Withdrawals were calculated usingnational population data for the year the withdrawal data werecollected.

Water Withdrawals as a Percent of Renewable WaterResources is the proportion of renewable water resourceswithdrawn on a per capita basis, expressed in cubic meters perperson per year (m3/person/year). The value is calculated bydividing water withdrawals per capita by actual renewablewater resources per capita.

Sectoral Share of water withdrawals, expressed as a percent-age, refers to the proportion of water used for one of three pur-poses: agriculture, industry, and domestic uses. All water with-drawals are allocated to one of these three categories.

Agricultural uses of water primarily include irrigation and, to alesser extent, livestock maintenance.

Domestic uses include drinking water plus water withdrawnfor homes, municipalities, commercial establishments, andpublic services (e.g. hospitals).

Industrial uses include cooling machinery and equipment, pro-ducing energy, cleaning and washing goods produced as ingre-dients in manufactured items, and as a solvent.

Desalinated Water Production, expressed in million cubicmeters, refers to the amount of water produced by the removalof salt from saline waters—usually seawater—using a varietyof techniques including reverse osmosis. Most desalinatedwater is used for domestic purposes.

Most Freshwater resources data were provided by AQUA-STAT, a global database of water statistics maintained by theFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations(FAO). AQUASTAT collects its information from a number ofsources—national water resources and irrigation master plans;national yearbooks, statistics and reports; FAO reports andproject documents; international surveys; and, results from sur-veys done by national or international research centers. In mostcases, a critical analysis of the information was necessary toensure consistency among the different data collected for agiven country.

When possible, cross-checking of information among coun-tries was used to improve assessment in countries where infor-mation was limited. When several sources gave different orcontradictory figures, preference was always given to informa-tion collected at the national or sub-national level. This prefer-ence is based on the assumption by FAO that no regional infor-mation can be more accurate than studies carried out at thecountry level. Unless proven to be wrong, official rather thanunofficial sources were used. In the case of shared waterresources, a comparison among countries was made to ensureconsistency at river-basin level.

For more information on the methodology used to collectthese data, please refer to the original source or: Food andAgriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): WaterResources, Development and Management Service. October,2001. Statistics on Water Resources by Country in FAO’s AQUA-STAT Programme (available on-line at http://www.fao.org/ag/agl/aglw/aquastat/water_res/index.stm). Rome: FAO.

FREQUENCY OF UPDATE BY DATA PROVIDERSAQUASTAT was developed by the Food and Agriculture Orga-nization of the United Nations in 1993; data have been availableon-line since 2001. Most freshwater data are not available in atime series, and the global data set contains data collectedover a time span of up to 30 years. AQUASTAT updates theirwebsite as new data become available, or when FAO conducts

276W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 2 – 2 0 0 4

Data Table 11 continued

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (50)

special regional studies. Studies were conducted in Africa in1994, the Near East in 1995–96, the former Soviet republics in1997, selected Asian countries in 1998–99, and Latin America &the Caribbean in 2000. Data from the Blue Plan on Mediter-ranean water withdrawals were last updated in 2002. Most dataupdates include revisions of past data.

DATA RELIABILITY AND CAUTIONARY NOTESWhile AQUASTAT represents the most complete and carefulcompilation of country-level water resources statistics to date,freshwater data are generally of poor quality. Informationsources are various but rarely complete. Some governmentswill keep internal water resources information confidentialbecause they are competing for water resources with borderingcountries. Many instances of water scarcity are highly localizedand are not reflected in national statistics. In addition, theaccuracy and reliability of information vary greatly amongregions, countries, and categories of information, as does theyear in which the information was gathered. As a result, noconsistency can be ensured among countries on the durationand dates of the period of reference. All data should be consid-ered order-of-magnitude estimates.

Groundwater Recharge tends to be overestimated in aridareas and underestimated in humid areas.

Natural Renewable Water Resources vary with time.Exchanges between countries are complicated when a rivercrosses the same border several times. Part of the incomingwater flow may thus originate from the same country in which itenters, making it necessary to calculate a “net” inflow to avoiddouble counting of resources. In addition, the water that isactually accessible to humans for consumption is often muchsmaller than the total renewable water resources indicated inthe data table.

Renewable Water Resources Per Capita contains waterresources data from a different set of years than the populationdata used in the calculation. While the water resources dataare usually long-term averages, inconsistencies may arisewhen combining it with 2002 population data.

Water Withdrawals as a Percentage of Actual WaterResources are also calculated using per capita data from twodifferent years. While this ratio can indicate that some coun-tries are depleting their water resources, it does not accuratelyreflect localized over-extraction from aquifers and streams. Inaddition, the calculation does not distinguish between groundand surface water.

Sectoral Withdrawal Data may not add to 100 because ofrounding. Evaporative losses from storage basins are not con-sidered; users should keep in mind, however, that in some partsof the world up to 25 percent of water that is withdrawn andplaced in reservoirs evaporates before it is used by any sector.

Desalinated Water Production may exist in some countrieswhere the volume of production is indicated to be zero, sinceAQUASTAT assumes that production is zero if no value hasbeen given for those countries where information on water useis available.

SOURCESRenewable Water Resources: Food and Agriculture Organi-zation of the United Nations (FAO): Water Resources, Develop-ment and Management Service. 2002. AQUASTAT InformationSystem on Water in Agriculture: Review of Water Resource Sta-tistics by Country. Rome: FAO. Available on-line at http://www.fao.org/waicent/faoinfo/agricult/agl/aglw/aquastat/water_res/index.htm.

Water Withdrawals: Food and Agriculture Organization of theUnited Nations (FAO): Water Resources, Development andManagement Service. 2002. AQUASTAT Information System onWater in Agriculture. Rome: FAO. Available on-line at http://www.fao.org/waicent/faoinfo/agricult/agl/aglw/aquastat/dbase/index.htm. Data for Mediterranean countries were pro-vided directly to WRI from: J. Margat, 2002. Present Water With-drawals in Mediterranean Countries. Paris: Blue Plan.

Population Data (for per capita calculations): PopulationDivision of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs ofthe United Nations Secretariat. 2002. World PopulationProspects: The 2000 Revision. New York: United Nations. Dataset on CD-ROM.

277P a r t I I : D a t a T a b l e s

Data Table 11 continued

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (51)

Under 65 & Pri- Secon-2002 2025 15 Over 2000 Urban Rural mary dary Women Men

WORLD 6,211,082 7,936,741 29 7 2.7 83 66.0 57.0 1.2 85 40 .. .. 75 86 dASIA (EXCL. MIDDLE EAST) 3,493,424 4,345,549 29 6 2.5 .. 67.9 57.4 0.4 70 31 .. .. 68 83Armenia 3,790 3,736 21 9 1.1 30 73.4 59.0 0.2 .. .. .. .. 98 99Azerbaijan 8,147 9,076 27 7 1.5 105 72.2 55.4 <0.1 90 70 96 82 .. ..Bangladesh 143,364 210,823 38 3 3.6 82 60.7 49.3 <0.1 71 41 104 e .. 31 50Bhutan 2,198 3,843 42 4 5.1 100 63.2 49.2 <0.1 65 70 16 5 .. ..Cambodia 13,776 22,310 43 3 4.8 135 56.2 47.1 2.7 56 10 103 e 20 59 81China 1,294,377 1,470,787 24 7 1.8 f 40 71.2 f 62.1 0.1 69 27 91 50 80 93Georgia 5,213 4,377 19 14 1.4 29 73.6 58.2 <0.1 100 99 .. 78 .. ..India 1,041,144 1,351,801 33 5 3.0 96 64.2 52.0 0.8 61 15 .. 39 47 70Indonesia 217,534 272,911 30 5 2.3 48 67.3 57.4 0.1 69 46 .. .. 83 93Japan 127,538 123,798 14 18 1.3 4 81.5 73.8 <0.1 .. .. 102 e .. .. ..Kazakhstan 16,027 16,090 26 7 2.0 75 65.0 54.3 0.1 100 98 .. 74 99 100Korea, Dem People's Rep 22,586 25,872 26 6 2.1 30 65.1 55.4 .. 99 100 .. .. .. ..Korea, Rep 47,389 52,065 20 8 1.5 5 75.5 66.0 <0.1 76 4 97 .. 97 99Kyrgyzstan 5,047 6,460 32 6 2.3 63 68.6 52.6 <0.1 100 100 85 .. .. ..Lao People's Dem Rep 5,530 8,721 42 4 4.8 105 54.5 44.7 <0.1 67 19 76 27 56 77Malaysia 23,036 31,326 34 4 2.9 9 73.0 61.6 0.4 .. 98 98 93 85 92Mongolia 2,587 3,478 33 4 2.3 78 63.9 52.4 <0.1 46 2 85 53 98 99Myanmar 48,956 60,243 32 5 2.8 110 56.2 49.1 .. 84 57 .. .. 81 89Nepal 24,153 38,706 41 4 4.5 100 59.8 45.8 0.5 73 22 .. .. 26 62Pakistan 148,721 250,981 41 4 5.1 110 61.0 48.1 g 0.1 95 43 .. .. 30 59Philippines 78,611 107,073 37 4 3.2 40 70.0 59.0 <0.1 93 69 .. .. 95 96Singapore 4,188 4,998 21 8 1.5 4 78.1 67.8 0.2 100 .. .. .. 89 97Sri Lanka 19,287 22,529 25 6 2.1 19 72.6 61.1 <0.1 97 93 102 e .. 90 95Tajikistan 6,177 8,066 37 5 2.9 73 68.0 50.8 <0.1 97 88 .. .. 99 100Thailand 64,344 77,480 26 6 2.0 29 70.8 59.7 1.8 96 96 77 55 94 97Turkmenistan 4,930 6,844 36 4 3.2 70 67.1 52.1 <0.1 .. .. .. .. .. ..Uzbekistan 25,618 34,203 34 5 2.3 67 69.7 54.3 <0.1 97 85 .. .. 99 100Viet Nam 80,226 105,488 32 5 2.3 39 69.2 58.9 0.3 82 38 97 49 91 95EUROPE 725,124 683,532 17 15 1.3 .. 74.1 64.7 0.4 .. .. .. .. 99 99 dAlbania 3,164 3,676 29 6 2.3 31 73.7 59.4 .. 99 85 .. .. 79 93Austria 8,069 7,605 16 16 1.2 5 78.5 70.3 0.2 100 100 88 .. .. ..Belarus 10,106 9,335 17 14 1.2 20 68.5 60.1 0.3 .. .. .. .. 100 100Belgium 10,276 10,205 17 17 1.5 6 78.8 69.4 0.2 .. .. .. .. .. ..Bosnia and Herzegovina 4,126 4,165 18 11 1.3 18 74.0 63.7 <0.1 h .. .. .. .. .. ..Bulgaria 7,790 6,125 15 16 1.1 16 70.9 63.4 <0.1 h 100 100 93 81 98 99Croatia 4,657 4,519 18 15 1.7 9 74.2 64.0 <0.1 .. .. .. .. 98 99Czech Rep 10,250 9,727 16 14 1.2 5 75.4 65.6 <0.1 .. .. 90 79 .. ..Denmark 5,343 5,359 18 15 1.7 5 76.6 69.5 0.2 .. .. 101 e 89 .. ..Estonia 1,361 1,062 16 15 1.2 21 71.2 60.8 1.0 93 .. 96 77 100 100Finland 5,183 5,138 18 15 1.6 5 78.0 68.8 <0.1 100 100 99 95 .. ..France 59,670 62,753 18 16 1.8 5 79.0 70.7 0.3 .. .. 100 94 .. ..Germany 81,990 78,897 15 17 1.3 5 78.2 69.4 0.1 .. .. 87 88 .. ..Greece 10,631 10,149 15 18 1.2 6 78.5 71.0 0.2 .. .. 95 86 96 99Hungary 9,867 8,783 16 15 1.2 9 72.0 59.9 0.1 100 98 82 85 99 100Iceland 283 319 23 12 1.9 4 79.4 71.2 0.2 .. .. 99 85 .. ..Ireland 3,878 4,745 21 11 2.0 6 77.0 69.3 0.1 .. .. 104 e 77 .. ..Italy 57,449 52,364 14 19 1.2 6 78.7 71.2 0.4 .. .. 101 e 88 98 99Latvia 2,392 2,090 16 15 1.1 21 71.2 57.7 0.4 .. .. 94 83 100 100Lithuania 3,682 3,418 18 14 1.2 21 72.7 58.4 0.1 .. .. 94 85 100 100Macedonia, FYR 2,051 2,067 22 10 1.5 26 73.6 64.9 <0.1 .. .. 96 79 .. ..Moldova, Rep 4,273 4,052 21 10 1.4 33 66.6 58.4 0.2 100 98 .. .. 99 100Netherlands 15,990 16,571 18 14 1.5 5 78.3 69.7 g 0.2 100 100 100 93 .. ..Norway 4,505 4,800 20 15 1.7 4 78.9 70.5 0.1 .. .. 102 e 96 .. ..Poland 38,542 37,254 18 13 1.3 10 73.9 61.8 0.1 h .. .. .. .. 100 100Portugal 10,049 9,831 17 16 1.5 6 76.2 66.3 0.5 .. .. 108 e 88 91 95Romania 22,332 20,585 17 14 1.3 22 69.8 61.7 <0.1 86 10 94 76 98 99Russian Federation 143,752 125,687 16 13 1.1 22 66.0 55.5 0.9 .. .. .. .. 100 100Serbia and Montenegro 10,522 10,044 19 14 1.6 20 73.2 64.3 0.2 100 99 .. .. 100 ..Slovakia 5,408 5,317 18 12 1.3 9 73.7 62.4 <0.1 100 100 .. .. .. ..Slovenia 1,983 1,847 15 15 1.1 5 76.1 66.9 <0.1 .. .. 94 89 100 100Spain 39,924 37,395 14 17 1.1 5 78.8 70.6 0.5 .. .. 105 e 92 97 99Sweden 8,823 8,518 17 18 1.3 4 80.1 71.4 0.1 100 100 103 e 100 .. ..Switzerland 7,167 6,729 16 16 1.4 4 79.1 72.1 0.5 100 100 94 83 .. ..Ukraine 48,652 39,569 17 15 1.1 21 68.1 56.8 1.0 100 98 .. .. 100 100United Kingdom 59,657 61,243 19 16 1.6 6 78.2 69.9 0.1 100 100 102 e 94 .. ..MIDDLE EAST & N. AFRICA 423,296 631,320 35 4 3.5 64 i 68.0 56.4 .. 91 70 .. .. 62 81Afghanistan 23,294 45,193 43 3 6.8 257 43.2 33.8 .. 25 8 .. .. .. ..Algeria 31,403 42,738 34 4 2.8 65 70.3 58.4 0.1 h 99 81 94 58 60 78Egypt 70,278 94,777 34 4 2.9 43 68.3 57.1 <0.1 100 96 92 .. 46 68Iran, Islamic Rep 72,376 99,343 35 3 2.8 44 69.7 58.8 <0.1 86 79 .. .. 71 85Iraq 24,246 40,298 41 3 4.8 130 64.9 52.6 <0.1 93 31 80 31 .. ..Israel 6,303 8,486 28 10 2.7 6 79.2 69.9 0.1 .. .. 95 85 93 97Jordan 5,196 8,666 40 3 4.3 34 71.0 58.5 <0.1 100 98 64 60 86 96Kuwait 2,023 3,219 28 3 2.7 10 76.5 64.7 .. .. .. 67 57 81 85Lebanon 3,614 4,581 30 6 2.2 32 73.5 60.7 .. 100 87 78 76 82 93Libyan Arab Jamahiriya 5,529 7,972 33 4 3.3 20 70.9 58.5 0.2 97 96 .. 71 71 92Morocco 30,988 42,002 34 4 3.0 46 68.7 54.9 0.1 86 44 79 .. 38 63Oman 2,709 5,411 43 3 5.5 14 71.5 59.7 0.1 98 61 66 58 65 82Saudi Arabia 21,701 40,473 42 3 5.5 29 72.2 59.5 .. 100 100 59 .. 70 84Syrian Arab Rep 17,040 27,410 39 3 3.7 29 71.8 59.6 .. 98 81 93 38 63 89Tunisia 9,670 12,343 28 6 2.1 28 70.9 61.4 .. 96 62 98 55 63 83Turkey 68,569 86,611 30 6 2.3 45 70.5 58.7 <0.1 h 97 70 100 .. 78 94United Arab Emirates 2,701 3,468 25 3 2.9 9 75.4 63.1 .. .. .. 83 70 81 76Yemen 19,912 48,206 51 2 7.6 117 61.9 49.1 0.1 89 21 61 35 29 70

RateRatio1998-1999 (percent) {c}

Percent of

in SpecificImproved Net SchoolSanitation Enrollment

TotalPopulation

MortalityUnder

2002 (thousands) {a}

Age GroupsPopulation

Total (percent ofper

(children

woman)2000-2005

Access to

population)

FertilityRate {a}

2000 2002

Adult LiteracyAge 5(per

1000 livebirths) (years)

2000

Life Expect-ancy at

Birth

Adults Ages 15-49

Living

(years) ancy {b}

Health-Adjusted

Life Expect- HIV or

AIDS(percent)

2001 2000-2005

Data Table 12 Population, Health, and Human Well-BeingSources: United Nations Population Division, United Nations Children’s Fund, World Health Organization, Joint United NationsProgram on HIV/AIDS, United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization.

278W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 2 – 2 0 0 4

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (52)

Data Table 12 continuedMore data tables are available. Log on to http://earthtrends.wri.org/datatables/population or send an e-mail [emailprotected] with “Instructions” in the message body.

Under 65 & Pri- Secon-2002 2025 15 Over 2000 Urban Rural mary dary Women Men

SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA 683,782 1,157,847 44 3 5.6 175 i 49.1 38.8 9.0 j 72 44 .. .. 56 71Angola 13,936 28,213 48 3 7.2 295 45.8 36.9 5.5 70 30 57 .. .. ..Benin 6,629 11,992 46 3 5.7 154 54.0 42.5 3.6 46 6 .. 16 26 55Botswana 1,564 1,826 42 3 3.9 101 36.1 37.3 38.8 88 43 81 57 82 76Burkina Faso 12,207 25,227 49 3 6.8 198 48.1 34.8 6.5 39 27 34 9 16 36Burundi 6,688 12,390 47 3 6.8 190 40.6 33.4 8.3 68 90 38 .. 44 58Cameroon 15,535 23,986 43 4 4.7 154 50.0 40.4 11.8 92 66 .. .. 67 81Central African Rep 3,844 5,886 43 4 4.9 180 44.3 34.1 12.9 38 16 53 .. 38 62Chad 8,390 16,383 47 3 6.7 198 46.3 39.3 3.6 81 13 55 7 38 55Congo 3,206 6,284 47 3 6.3 108 51.6 42.6 7.2 14 .. .. .. 77 89Congo, Dem Rep 54,275 114,876 49 3 6.7 207 52.1 34.4 4.9 54 6 32 12 54 75Côte d'Ivoire 16,691 25,024 41 3 4.6 173 47.9 39.0 9.7 71 35 59 .. 40 61Equatorial Guinea 483 889 44 4 5.9 156 52.0 44.8 3.4 60 46 83 26 77 93Eritrea 3,993 7,063 44 3 5.3 114 52.4 41.0 2.8 66 1 34 19 47 69Ethiopia 66,040 113,418 45 3 6.8 174 43.3 35.4 6.4 33 7 35 16 34 49Gabon 1,293 2,178 41 6 5.4 90 52.9 46.6 .. 55 43 .. .. .. ..Gambia 1,371 2,077 40 3 4.8 128 47.1 46.9 1.6 41 35 61 23 32 46Ghana 20,176 30,936 40 3 4.2 102 57.2 46.7 3.0 74 70 .. .. 66 82Guinea 8,381 14,120 44 3 5.8 175 48.5 40.3 .. 94 41 46 13 .. ..Guinea-Bissau 1,257 2,170 44 4 6.0 215 45.4 36.6 2.8 95 44 .. .. 26 57Kenya 31,904 44,897 42 3 4.2 120 49.3 40.7 15.0 96 82 .. .. 79 90Lesotho 2,076 2,225 39 4 4.5 133 40.2 35.3 31.0 72 40 60 14 94 74Liberia 3,298 7,638 43 3 6.8 235 55.6 37.8 .. .. .. 41 .. 39 72Madagascar 16,913 30,759 45 3 5.7 139 53.6 42.9 0.3 70 30 63 13 62 75Malawi 11,828 19,544 46 3 6.3 188 39.3 30.9 15.0 96 70 .. 7 49 76Mali 12,019 23,461 46 4 7.0 233 52.1 34.5 1.7 93 58 42 .. 17 38Mauritania 2,830 5,351 44 3 6.0 183 52.5 41.5 .. 44 19 60 .. 31 52Mozambique 18,986 28,012 44 3 5.9 200 38.0 31.3 13.0 68 26 41 7 31 62Namibia 1,819 2,776 43 4 4.9 69 44.3 35.6 22.5 96 17 86 31 83 84Niger 11,641 25,725 50 2 8.0 270 46.2 33.1 .. 79 5 26 6 9 25Nigeria 120,047 202,957 45 3 5.4 184 52.1 41.6 5.8 66 45 .. .. 59 74Rwanda 8,148 12,883 44 3 5.8 187 40.9 31.9 8.9 12 8 91 .. 63 75Senegal 9,908 16,511 44 3 5.1 139 54.3 44.9 0.5 94 48 59 .. 30 49Sierra Leone 4,814 9,052 45 3 6.5 316 40.5 29.5 7.0 88 53 .. .. .. ..Somalia 9,557 21,192 48 2 7.3 225 48.9 35.1 1.0 .. .. .. .. .. ..South Africa 44,203 43,772 33 4 2.9 70 47.4 43.2 20.1 93 80 .. .. 85 87Sudan 32,559 49,556 40 4 4.5 108 57.0 45.1 2.6 87 48 46 .. 49 71Tanzania, United Rep 36,820 60,395 44 3 5.0 165 51.1 38.1 7.8 99 86 48 4 69 85Togo 4,779 8,219 44 3 5.4 142 52.2 42.7 6.0 69 17 88 23 45 74Uganda 24,780 53,765 49 2 7.1 127 46.0 35.7 5.0 93 77 .. 9 59 79Zambia 10,872 19,026 47 3 5.7 202 42.2 33.0 21.5 99 64 73 22 74 86Zimbabwe 13,076 18,672 45 3 4.5 117 42.9 38.8 33.7 71 57 .. .. 86 94NORTH AMERICA 319,925 383,678 21 12 1.9 8 77.7 67.5 0.6 100 100 .. .. .. ..Canada 31,268 36,717 19 13 1.6 6 79.0 70.0 0.3 100 99 96 94 .. ..United States 288,530 346,822 21 12 1.9 8 77.5 67.2 0.6 100 100 95 90 .. ..C. AMERICA & CARIBBEAN 178,512 233,965 33 5 2.7 37 k 71.2 61.4 0.8 86 49 .. .. 86 89Belize 236 324 37 4 2.9 41 74.4 59.2 2.0 71 25 99 39 94 94Costa Rica 4,200 5,929 31 5 2.7 12 76.7 65.3 0.6 89 97 .. .. 96 96Cuba 11,273 11,733 20 10 1.6 9 76.4 65.9 <0.1 99 95 97 75 97 97Dominican Rep 8,639 10,924 32 4 2.7 48 66.9 56.2 2.5 70 60 87 53 84 84El Salvador 6,520 8,975 35 5 2.9 40 70.3 57.3 0.6 89 76 81 37 77 82Guatemala 11,995 19,624 43 4 4.4 59 65.6 54.7 1.0 83 79 83 .. 63 77Haiti 8,400 11,549 39 4 4.0 125 53.3 43.1 6.1 50 16 80 .. 50 54Honduras 6,732 10,106 41 3 3.7 40 65.8 56.8 1.6 93 55 .. .. 76 76Jamaica 2,621 3,264 31 7 2.4 20 75.7 64.0 1.2 99 99 92 79 91 84Mexico 101,842 130,194 32 5 2.5 30 73.0 64.2 0.3 88 34 102 e 56 90 94Nicaragua 5,347 8,606 42 3 3.8 45 69.1 56.9 0.2 95 72 .. .. 67 67Panama 2,942 3,779 30 6 2.4 26 74.5 63.9 1.5 99 83 .. .. 92 93Trinidad and Tobago 1,306 1,437 23 7 1.5 20 74.8 61.7 2.5 .. .. 93 72 98 99SOUTH AMERICA 355,695 460,770 30 6 2.4 37 k 70.2 59.2 0.6 86 51 .. .. 90 91Argentina 37,944 47,160 27 10 2.4 21 73.8 63.9 0.7 .. .. 107 e 74 97 97Bolivia 8,705 13,131 39 4 3.9 80 63.5 51.4 0.1 86 42 97 .. 81 93Brazil 174,706 218,980 28 5 2.2 38 68.3 57.1 g 0.7 84 43 98 .. 88 88Chile 15,589 19,548 28 7 2.4 12 75.6 65.5 0.3 96 97 88 70 96 96Colombia 43,495 59,161 32 5 2.6 30 71.9 60.9 0.4 96 56 87 .. 92 92Ecuador 13,112 17,796 33 5 2.8 32 70.5 60.3 0.3 92 74 97 46 91 94Guyana 765 703 30 5 2.3 74 62.4 52.1 2.7 97 81 85 .. 98 99Paraguay 5,778 9,355 39 4 3.8 31 70.7 60.9 .. 94 93 92 42 93 95Peru 26,523 35,518 32 5 2.6 50 69.5 58.8 0.4 79 49 103 e 61 86 95Suriname 421 442 29 6 2.1 33 71.1 60.6 1.2 99 75 .. .. .. ..Uruguay 3,385 3,871 25 13 2.3 17 75.0 64.1 0.3 95 85 92 66 98 97Venezuela 25,093 34,775 33 5 2.7 23 73.3 62.3 0.5 h 71 48 .. .. 93 94OCEANIA 31,281 40,020 24 10 2.3 25 74.8 66.3 0.2 97 92 .. .. 98 99 dAustralia 19,536 23,523 20 12 1.8 l 6 79.2 l 71.5 0.1 100 100 .. .. .. ..Fiji 832 954 33 4 3.0 22 69.8 59.6 0.1 75 12 101 e 76 92 95New Zealand 3,837 4,302 23 12 2.0 6 78.0 70.8 0.1 .. .. .. .. .. ..Papua New Guinea 5,032 8,023 40 2 4.3 112 57.7 46.8 0.7 92 80 85 22 59 72Solomon Islands 479 943 45 3 5.3 25 69.2 59.0 .. 98 18 .. .. .. ..DEVELOPED 1,321,286 1,359,805 19 14 1.6 .. 74.6 65.1 1.1 .. .. .. .. 99 99 dDEVELOPING 4,889,753 6,576,876 32 5 3.0 91 65.3 54.8 1.2 73 37 .. .. 68 82a. Medium variant population projections. b. Health-Adjusted Life Expectancy (HALE) is number of years that a newborn can expect to live in full health based on current rates of ill-health and mortality. c. Includes all adults aged 15 years and over. d. Regional values were interpolated by WRI from UNESCO's literacy data for 2000 and 2005. e. Inconsistencies with enrollment or population numbers can skew enrollment ratios, erroneously reporting them to be greater than 100% (see the technical notes for more information). f. Data for China do not include Hong Kong and Macao. g. Figure not yet endorsed by Member States as official statistics. h. Data are from 1999. i. Regional totals were calculated by UNICEF; the countries included maybe slightly different from those in WRI's regional definitions. j. Regional estimate calculated by UNAIDS. k. Regional totals were calculated by UNICEF and combine South America, Central America, and the Caribbean. l. Including Christmas Island, Cocos (Keeling) Islands, and Norfolk Island.

Access to

2002

in SpecificAge Groups

2002Rate

(percent) {c}1998-1999

EnrollmentRatio

Adult LiteracyNet School

Percent of Total

Rate {a} Sanitation

2000-20052000

(percent ofpopulation)

Fertility Improved

Total (childrenper

(thousands) {a}Population

woman)

PopulationMortality Life Health- Adults

Under Expect- Adjusted Ages 15-49Age 5 ancy at Life Living (per Birth Expect- HIV or

1000 live (years) ancy {b} AIDS

2005 2000 2001births) 2000- (years) (percent)

279P a r t I I : D a t a T a b l e s

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (53)

VARIABLE DEFINITIONS AND METHODOLOGYTotal Population is the mid-year population projected for aspecific country, area or region, measured in thousands of peo-ple. The values are estimated using models based on variousdemographic parameters: a country’s population size, age andsex distribution, fertility and mortality rates by age and sexgroups, growth rates of urban and rural populations, and levelsof internal and international migration.

Percent of Population Under Age 15 is the proportion of thetotal population younger than 15 years of age.

Percent of Population Age 65 and Over is the proportion ofthe total population 65 years of age and older.

Total Fertility Rate is an estimate of the average number ofchildren a woman would have over the course of her entire lifeif current age-specific fertility rates remained constant duringher reproductive years.

Life Expectancy at Birth is the average number of years that anewborn baby is expected to live if the age-specific mortality rateseffective at the year of birth apply throughout his or her lifetime.

For the variables defined above, the U.N. Population Divisionevaluates census and survey results from all countries. Thesedata are adjusted for over-enumeration and under-enumerationof certain age and sex groups (e.g., infants, female children,and young males), misreporting of age and sex distributions,and changes in definitions, when necessary. These adjustmentsincorporate data from civil registrations; population surveys;earlier censuses; and, when necessary, population modelsbased on information from economically similar countries.After the figures for population size and age/sex compositionhave been adjusted, these data are scaled to 1990. Historicaldata are used when deemed accurate, also with adjustmentsand scaling. However, accurate historical data do not exist formany developing countries. In such cases, the U.N. PopulationDivision uses available information and demographic models toestimate the main demographic parameters. Projections arebased on estimates of the 1990 base-year population. Age- andsex-specific mortality rates are applied to the base-year popu-lation to determine the number of survivors at the end of each5-year period. Births are projected by applying age-specific fer-tility rates to the projected female population. Births are dis-tributed by an assumed sex ratio, and the appropriate age- andsex-specific survival rates are applied. Future migration ratesare also estimated on an age- and sex-specific basis. Combin-ing future fertility, mortality, and migration rates yields the pro-jected population size. Assumptions about future mortality, fer-tility, and migration rates are made on a country-by-countrybasis and, when possible, are based on historical trends. TheU.N. Population Division publishes projections for high-,medium- and low-fertility scenarios; all projections in this tableare for the medium-case fertility scenario.

Mortality Under Age 5 is the probability of a child dyingbetween birth and age five expressed per 1,000 live births. Thedata on mortality of children after infancy is typically obtainedfrom population census information, civil registration records ondeaths of young children, United Nations Childrens’ Fund(UNICEF) Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS) and Demo-graphic and Health Surveys (DHS). For each country, UNICEFand its partners plotted all data from 1960 to the present on agraph; a curve was fitted through this data using a weightedleast-squares regression model. The basic model assumes thatthe rate of change of mortality is linear with respect to time.

Health-Adjusted Life Expectancy (HALE) is defined as thenumber of years that a newborn can expect to live in full health

based on current rates of ill health and mortality. Healthy lifeexpectancy combines information on mortality and disability,making it a valuable policy tool for assessing health burdensinternationally. These data are the product of more than 15years of work by WHO to measure severity-weighted inci-dences of ill health. To determine healthy life expectancies, reg-ular life expectancy is first calculated for each age group in apopulation according to standard methodologies. Next, the fre-quency of different states of health is measured along with theseverity of these disabilities. Finally, the length of time that apopulation is affected by disabilities compared to full health isvalued and reported in years.

Adults Ages 15–49 Living With HIV or AIDS is the esti-mated percentage of people aged 15–49 living with HIV/AIDS.These estimates include all people with HIV infection—whether or not they have developed symptoms of AIDS—whoare alive at the end of the year specified. Data for adults ages15 to 49 captures those in their most sexually active years.While the risk of HIV infection continues beyond the age of 50,the vast majority of people with substantial risk behavior arelikely to have become infected by this age. Measuring infectionwithin this age range also makes populations with different agestructures more comparable. In order to estimate prevalencerates of HIV, prevalence estimates for a single point in time andthe starting date of the epidemic were used to plot an epidemiccurve charting the spread of HIV in a particular country. Preva-lence data were collected in developing countries with general-ized epidemics using surveillance data from antenatal clinics;in other cases, epidemiologists examined high risk populations(sex workers, intravenous drug users, homosexual males).

Access to Improved Sanitation measures the percentage ofthe population with access to any of the following excreta dis-posal facilities: connection to a public sewer, connection to aseptic tank, pour-flush latrine, simple pit latrine, and ventilatedimproved pit latrine. A poor water supply and sanitation systemcan lead to a number of diseases, including diarrhoea, intestinalworms, and cholera. Examples of an unimproved sanitation sys-tem include: open pit latrines, public or shared latrines, andservice or bucket latrines (where excreta are manuallyremoved). WHO emphasizes that these data measure access toan improved excreta disposal system—access to a sanitary sys-tem cannot be adequately measured on a global scale. Datawere collected from assessment questionnaires and householdsurveys and plotted on a graph for each country to show cover-age in available years (not necessarily 1990 and 2000). A trendline was drawn and reviewed by a panel of experts to determinethe level of sanitation available in 1990 and 2000. Particular carewas taken with the 40 most populous developing countries.

Net School Enrollment Ratio (NER) is defined as the enroll-ment of the official age group for a given level of educationexpressed as a percentage of the population from the same agegroup. The theoretical maximum value is 100%. A high NERdenotes a high degree of participation of the official school-agepopulation. If the NER is below 100%, users should not assumethat the remaining school-aged population is not enrolled inany school; they could be enrolled in school at other grade lev-els. Primary Education is defined by the International StandardClassification of Education (ISCED) as the “beginning of sys-tematic apprenticeship of reading, writing and mathematics.”Programs are typically six years long and represent the begin-ning of compulsory education in many countries. Secondaryeducation follows primary education, and is characterized asbeing subject-oriented with specialized fields of learning. Pro-grams may be vocational or technical in nature, and studentsachieve a full implementation of basic skills. Net enrollmentratio is calculated by dividing the number of pupils enrolledwho are of the official age group for a given level of education

280W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 2 – 2 0 0 4

Data Table 12 continued

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (54)

by the total population of the same age group. National govern-ments provide the United Nations Educational, Scientific, andCultural Organization (UNESCO) with enrollment data basedon a series of electronic questionnaires. When data fromnational governments are not available or are of inferior quality,UNESCO will estimate enrollment ratios from background data,if available.

Adult Literacy Rate is the proportion of adults aged 15 yearsand over who can both read and write with understanding ashort, simple statement on their everyday life. Most literacydata are collected during national population censuses andsupplemented by household surveys, labor force surveys,employment surveys, industry surveys, and agricultural surveyswhen they are available. UNESCO uses this data to graph alogistic regression model. Male and female literacy rates aremodeled separately. When census and survey data are notavailable, literacy rates for a specific country are estimatedbased on neighboring countries with similar characteristics.

FREQUENCY OF UPDATE BY DATA PROVIDERSBoth the UN Population Division and the Joint United NationsProgram on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) publish country-level statis-tics every two years with annual revisions of key estimates.UNICEF publishes the most recent available data each year.Other data sets in this table are updated irregularly—educa-tional statistics are updated as new country-level data are sentto UNESCO, and healthy life expectancy was calculated for thefirst time in 2001. Most updates include revisions of past data.

DATA RELIABILITY AND CAUTIONARY NOTESTotal Population, Fertility, and Life Expectancy: Althoughprojections cannot factor in unforeseen events (e.g. famine),U.N. demographic models are based on surveys and censuseswith well-understood qualities, which make these data fairlyreliable.

Mortality Under Age 5: Estimates were calculated based on awide variety of sources of disparate quality. For information onthe underlying data for each country’s regressions, refer to thecountry estimates and new country data available from UNICEFon-line at http://www.childinfo.org/cmr/kh98meth.html.

Health-Adjusted Life Expectancy: Some estimates have notyet been endorsed by Member States as official statistics. Thedata will improve as national governments become involved inproviding data and survey results. WHO has estimated theuncertainty in HALE for each country; these results are pub-lished in the World Health Report 2001 (available on-line athttp://www.who.int/whr2001/2001/).

Adults Ages 15–49 Living with HIV or AIDS: While the HIVsurveillance systems are generally more extensive than thosefor other diseases, problems do remain with the data. Data areoften very weak for marginalized risk groups such as intravenu-ous drug users or homosexual males. Infection rates in thegeneral population are calculated based on infection rates inchildbearing women; other women and men are then assumedto have the same rate of infection. Prevalence of HIV isassumed to be uniform in periurban and urban areas. The origi-nal source material captures some of these uncertainties withestimates of low and high values for the total number ofHIV/AIDS infections. For a detailed description of the collec-tion methodology and limitations of this data, please see: B.Schwartlander et al. 1999. “Country-specific estimates andmodels of HIV and AIDS: methods and limitations.” AIDS, 13:2445–2458.

Access to Improved Sanitation: These data have becomemore reliable as WHO and UNICEF shift from provider-basedinformation (national census estimates) to consumer-basedinformation (survey data). Nonetheless, estimates were calcu-lated based on a wide variety of sources of disparate quality.Definitions of urban and rural are not consistent across coun-tries. In addition, regions with higher overall levels of servicetend to implement a stricter definition of “adequate” sanitation.

Net School Enrollment: Even though UNESCO has appliedthe same methodology to analyze all of the country data, defini-tions of “schooling” and “enrollment” are not strictly compara-ble among countries. As net enrollment ratios approach 100%,inconsistencies with enrollment and/or population data aremore likely to skew the resulting ratios. As a result, some netenrollment ratios are greater than 100%. Difficulties also arisewhen a substantial proportion of students begin school earlierthan the prescribed age, or when the reference date for entryinto primary education does not coincide with the birthdays ofall eligible students.

Adult Literacy Rate:The availability and quality of nationalstatistics on literacy vary widely, particularly for developingcountries. National census and survey data are typically col-lected only once every decade. In addition, many industrializedcountries have stopped collecting literacy data in recent years,based on the sometimes incorrect assumption that universalprimary education means universal literacy. When census andsurvey data are not available for a particular country, estimatesare sometimes made based on neighboring countries. Actualdefinitions of adult literacy are not strictly comparable amongcountries. Some countries equate persons with no schoolingwith illiterates, or change definitions between censuses. Inaddition, UNESCO’s definition of literacy does not include peo-ple who, though familiar with the basics of reading and writing,do not have the skills to function at a reasonable level in theirown society. Practices for identifying literates and illiteratesduring actual census enumeration may also vary, and errors inliteracy self-declaration can affect data reliability.

SOURCESPopulation, Total Fertility and Life Expectancy: PopulationDivision of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs ofthe United Nations Secretariat. 2002. World PopulationProspects: The 2000 Revision. New York: United Nations. Dataset on CD-ROM. Mortality under Age 5 and Access toImproved Sanitation: United Nation’s Children’s Fund(UNICEF). 2001. State of the World’s Children 2002. New York:UNICEF. Data available on-line at http://www.unicef.org/sowc02/. Improved Sanitation data were collected under theUNICEF-World Health Organization (WHO) Joint MonitoringProgramme. Health-Adjusted Life Expectancy: WorldHealth Organization (WHO). 2001. World Health Report 2001:Annex Table 4. Geneva: WHO. Data available on-line at http://www.who.int/whr/2001/main/en/annex/annex4.htm. AdultsLiving with HIV or AIDS: Joint United Nations Programmeon HIV/AIDS. July 2002. UNAIDS Barcelona Report on theGlobal HIV/AIDS Epidemic. Geneva: UNAIDS. Data availableon-line at http://www.unaids.org/barcelona/presskit/barcelona%20report/contents.html. Net School Enroll-ment: United Nations Educational, Scientific, and CulturalOrganization (UNESCO) Institute for Statistics. 2002. Unpub-lished data. UNESCO: Montreal. Adult Literacy Rate: UnitedNations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization(UNESCO) Institute for Statistics, Literacy and Non FormalEducation Sector. 2002. Adult illiteracy for population aged 15years and above, by country and by gender 1970–2015. Paris:UNESCO. Data available on-line at http://www.uis.unesco.org/en/stats/stats0.htm.

281P a r t I I : D a t a T a b l e s

Data Table 12 continued

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (55)

ASIA (EXCLUDING THE MIDDLE EAST)Armenia L DAzerbaijan L DBangladesh L Bhutan L Brunei Darussalam H Cambodia L China M East Timor L Georgia M DHong Kong H India L Indonesia M Japan H DKazakhstan M DKorea, Dem People’s Rep M Korea, Rep H Kyrgyzstan L DLao People’s Dem Rep L Macau H Malaysia M Maldives M Mongolia L Myanmar L Nepal L Pakistan L Philippines M Singapore H Sri Lanka M Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan L DThailand M Turkmenistan L DUzbekistan M DViet Nam L

EUROPEAlbania L DAndorra H DAustria H DBelarus M DBelgium H DBosnia and Herzegovina L DBulgaria M D

Channel Islands H DCroatia M DCzech Rep M DDenmark H DEstonia M DFaeroe Islands H DFinland H DFrance H DGermany H DGibraltar DGreece H DHungary M DIceland H DIreland H DIsle of Man M DItaly H DLatvia M DLiechtenstein H DLithuania M DLuxembourg H DMacedonia, FYR M DMalta M DMoldova, Rep L DMonaco H DNetherlands H DNorway H DPoland M DPortugal H DRomania M DRussian Federation M DSan Marino H DSerbia and Montenegro M DSlovakia M DSlovenia H DSpain H DSweden H DSwitzerland H DUkraine M DUnited Kingdom H D

MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICAAfghanistan L Algeria M Bahrain M Cyprus H Egypt M Iran, Islamic Rep M Iraq M Israel H DJordan M Kuwait H Lebanon M Libyan Arab Jamahiriya M Morocco M Oman M Qatar H Saudi Arabia M Syrian Arab Rep M Tunisia M Turkey M United Arab Emirates H West Bank M Western Sahara M Yemen L

SUB-SAHARAN AFRICAAngola L Benin L Botswana M Burkina Faso L Burundi L Cameroon L Cape Verde M Central African Rep L Chad L Comoros L Congo L Congo, Dem Rep L Côte d’Ivoire L Djibouti M Equatorial Guinea M Eritrea L Ethiopia L Gabon M

282W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 2 – 2 0 0 4

Regional Groupings of Countries

Countries are listed according to their primary regional classification, assigned by the World Resources Institute.

World Bank income designations follow the country names: “H” represents high-income countries, “M” middle-incomecountries, and “L” low-income countries.

Developed countries are labeled with a “D”; developing countries are not labeled. WRI uses the Food and AgricultureOrganization of the United Nations’ definitions of developed and developing countries.

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (56)

Gambia L Ghana L Guinea L Guinea-Bissau L Kenya L Lesotho L Liberia L Madagascar L Malawi L Mali L Mauritania L Mauritius M Mozambique L Namibia M Niger L Nigeria L Réunion H Rwanda L Saint Helena Sao Tome & Principe L Senegal L Seychelles M Sierra Leone L Somalia L South Africa M DSudan L Swaziland M Tanzania L Togo L Uganda L Zambia L Zimbabwe L

NORTH AMERICABermuda H Canada H DGreenland H Saint Pierre and Miquelon United States H D

CENTRAL AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEANAntigua and Barbuda M Aruba H Bahamas H Barbados M Belize M British Virgin Islands Cayman Islands H Costa Rica M Cuba M Dominica M Dominican Rep M El Salvador M Grenada M Guadeloupe M Guatemala M Haiti L Honduras L Jamaica M Martinique H Mexico M Netherlands Antilles H Nicaragua L Panama M Puerto Rico M Saint Kitts and Nevis M St. Lucia M St. Vincent & Grenadines M Trinidad and Tobago M Turks and Caicos Islands Virgin Islands H

SOUTH AMERICAArgentina M Bolivia M Brazil M Chile M Colombia M Ecuador M Falkland Islands French Guiana H Guyana M Paraguay M Peru M Suriname M Uruguay M Venezuela M American Samoa M

OCEANIAAustralia H DCook Islands Fiji M French Polynesia H Guam H Kiribati M Marshall Islands M Micronesia, Fed States M Nauru New Caledonia H New Zealand H DNiue Northern Mariana Islands H Palau M Papua New Guinea M Samoa M Solomon Islands M Tonga M Vanuatu M

283P a r t I I : D a t a T a b l e s


The Financial Capability of the Uk Datatables

jQuery Datatables Part I: The Phantom Menacedeveloper.ucsd.edu/_files/datatables2.pdf· jQuery Datatables Part I: The Phantom Menace Widget of the Week (WoW) Series

jQuery Datatables Part I: The Phantom Menace· jQuery Datatables Part I: The Phantom Menace ... Can return HTML fragment and just stick it somewhere on the page. Use the 5Ps approach:

сан судлал.230 230 230

Portico 283

Edição 283

Strillone 283

ASP.NET - insert - delete -update DataTables (disconnected datasets) Shopping Basket

Cesta Ljubljanskih brigad 11b - plinovodi.si 283 304,8 350 130 180 450 230 180 520 470 300 210 230 230 310 254 254 450 76 405 40 300 300 16 300 16 16 16 16 300 300 300 600 300 300

Campanile 283

Schamper 283

Gonzalez 283

JSF dataTables – Basic Properties and Development Techniques

JSF dataTables – Advanced use of Properties and Development Techniques

Edicio 283

PP 230-283 Data Tables - World Resources Institutepdf.wri.org/wr2002fulltxt_230-283_datatables.pdf· • Comprehensive technical notes are available in the pages following each data

Designing DataTables

City of Mississauga MAX System€¦· DWELLING 800 230 257 283 275 230 284 920 704 719 644 732 909 AREA(m2) INTERIOR ALTERATIONS SECOND STOREY ADDITION/ALTERATIONS INDUSTRIAL LAUNDRY

django-rest-framework-datatables Documentation › pdf › django-rest-framework...But django-rest-framework-datatables can do much more ! As you will learn in the tutorial, it speaks

AstanaCalling #283

doc2.clib.psu.ac.th1 2 2 uaatJUUUmaaØU .. 203 204 222 222 229 230 234 240 243 283 290

Mampato #283

Número 283

Edición 283

GACETILLA 283

QuickTest Professional - Ningapi.ning.com/.../15250309BookPreviewQuickTestProfessionalUnplugg…· HP QuickTest Professional is a functional test automation tool. It ... 4 .DataTables

PERIODICO 283

CSCI 6962: Server-side Design and Programming JSF DataTables and Shopping Carts

RN3F01A / RL3F01A€¦· RN3F01A / RL3F01A FWD 3 Speed D C E B A 43 070 032 529 304 032 277* 730 276* Pinion 283 714 283 679 208 799 Converter Reactor 750 318 Bell Hsg. 062 554 230

Notíciestgn 283

NOTIhumanas 283

A Practical Guide to .NET DataTables, DataSets and DataGrids - Part 2 Table

Wr2002fulltxt 230-283 Datatables - [PDF Document] (2024)

FAQs

How to create a PDF from a DataTable? ›

No need to convert the datatable to excel, If the datatable is in the excel then you can use the excel activities to save the excel as pdf, for that you can use the Save Excel File As PDF activity. → Use the Use excel file activity and pass the excel file path.

How do I add a PDF button in DataTable? ›

The Javascript shown below is used to initialise the table shown in this example: $('#example'). DataTable({ layout: { topStart: { buttons: [ { extend: 'pdfHtml5', download: 'open' } ] } } }); new DataTable('#example', { layout: { topStart: { buttons: [ { extend: 'pdfHtml5', download: 'open' } ] } } });

How to export DataTable to PDF in jQuery? ›

HTML table to Excel, PDF, or CSV using jQuery DataTables, you can use the following steps,
  1. Include the necessary libraries. You need to include the following libraries in your HTML file: ...
  2. Create the HTML table. Create the HTML table that you want to export. ...
  3. Initialize the DataTable. ...
  4. Export the table.
Mar 28, 2023

How do I convert a table to PDF? ›

Save Excel documents as PDF files
  1. Open your Excel workbook and select the ranges or sheets you want to convert to a PDF file. ...
  2. Click File > Save as.
  3. In the Save As dialog window, select PDF (. ...
  4. Click the Options... ...
  5. The Options dialog box will open and you select one of the options according to your needs:
Mar 22, 2023

How do I create a PDF from a database? ›

How to export SQL Server data to PDF
  1. In Object Explorer, right-click a database, point to Data Pump, and then click Export Data.
  2. On the Export format page, select the PDF export format or load export options from a template file if you saved it previously.

How do I make a data table from a PDF? ›

Open Excel and click on the 'Data' tab. Click on 'Get Data' and select 'From File' Choose 'From PDF' and navigate to the PDF file you want to extract data from. Select the table you want to import and click 'Load'

How do I download a DataTable? ›

Download
  1. Choose a styling framework. DataTables. DataTables' default styling. v2.1.3. Bootstrap 3. ...
  2. Select packages. jQuery 3. DataTables requires jQuery. Don't select either version if you already have it. v3.7.0. ...
  3. Pick a download method. CDN. Download. NPM. Yarn.

How to extract table data from PDF using JavaScript? ›

Extract Table with Text from PDF (Node. js) in JavaScript using PDF.co Web API
  1. Source Code and Template.
  2. Install Requests Module.
  3. Insert API Key.
  4. Source and Destination File.
  5. Add Template.
  6. Run JavaScript Program.

Can you create a PDF with a table of contents? ›

Select the folder where you want to save your document, and in the drop-down menu titled Save as type, choose PDF. This will resave your Word document — including the new clickable table of contents — as a PDF that's ready to be shared with users on any device.

How do I create a data PDF? ›

How to create PDF files:
  1. Open Acrobat and choose “Tools” > “Create PDF”.
  2. Select the file type you want to create a PDF from: single file, multiple files, scan, or other option.
  3. Click “Create” or “Next” depending on the file type.
  4. Follow the prompts to convert to PDF and save to your desired location.

How do I import data into a PDF form? ›

Here's how to import data from a CSV file into a PDF file: Open the PDF form file in Foxit PDF Reader, choose the 'Form' tab > 'Import' > navigate to the location of the desired CSV format file, select it, and press 'Open'. You will receive a prompt saying that the form data has been successfully imported.

How do I copy a table format in PDF? ›

Here's how to copy PDF tables with formatting using Adobe Acrobat Reader:
  1. Open the PDF file in Adobe Acrobat Pro.
  2. Select the 'Select' tool from the top toolbar.
  3. Drag your mouse to select the table content you want to copy.
  4. Right-click the selected content and choose 'Copy With Formatting'
Jul 10, 2024

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Lakeisha Bayer VM

Last Updated:

Views: 6462

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (49 voted)

Reviews: 80% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Lakeisha Bayer VM

Birthday: 1997-10-17

Address: Suite 835 34136 Adrian Mountains, Floydton, UT 81036

Phone: +3571527672278

Job: Manufacturing Agent

Hobby: Skimboarding, Photography, Roller skating, Knife making, Paintball, Embroidery, Gunsmithing

Introduction: My name is Lakeisha Bayer VM, I am a brainy, kind, enchanting, healthy, lovely, clean, witty person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.